Is your makeup harmful? Testing big brands for 'forever chemicals' (Marketplace)
TLDRThe transcript reveals the pervasive issue of PFAS, a group of highly persistent chemicals known as 'forever chemicals,' found in everyday products such as cosmetics and food packaging. The investigation uncovers the potential health risks associated with these chemicals, including links to certain diseases and compromised immunity. Despite evidence of corporate knowledge about the dangers, PFAS remain in use with inadequate regulation. The segment calls for increased awareness, stricter regulations, and a shift towards safer alternatives to protect public health and the environment.
Takeaways
- 🧪 PFAS, or 'forever chemicals', are a group of up to 12,000 persistent, man-made chemicals found in everyday products like rain jackets, non-stick pans, and cosmetics.
- 🚫 These chemicals are highly persistent, lasting for decades or even centuries in the environment and human bodies, posing potential health risks.
- 🤰 Exposure to PFAS is almost inevitable, and they have been linked to certain diseases, lower fertility, compromised immune systems, and reduced vaccine responses in children.
- 🔍 Identifying PFAS in specific products is challenging as they are not required to be listed on labels and can be present incidentally in the manufacturing process.
- 🧬 Lab testing revealed PFAS in some makeup products from popular brands like Mac, Marcelle, and Quo, despite companies claiming they do not add PFAS as an ingredient.
- 🚷 Federal regulations in Canada forbid two specific PFAS chemical precursors, but the presence of PFAS in products does not necessarily mean violation if not intentionally added.
- 🥜 PFAS contamination has severe consequences for farmers, with some unable to sell their products and facing significant economic and emotional impacts.
- 🌿 In Maine, USA, efforts are being made to ban PFAS in all consumer products by 2030 due to the devastating effects of these chemicals on the environment and human health.
- 🇨🇦 Canadian regulations are currently being pressured to take more decisive action on PFAS, with experts urging for a maximum acceptable level in consumer products.
- 🧴 Consumers can reduce exposure to PFAS by avoiding products marketed as water-resistant or long-lasting, as these may contain the 'forever chemicals'.
- 📈 The scientific community and government bodies are increasingly recognizing the need for action on PFAS, with calls for legislation to eliminate their use and presence in consumer products and the environment.
Q & A
What are PFAS and why are they referred to as 'forever chemicals'?
-PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a large group of man-made chemicals that are highly persistent in the environment. They are called 'forever chemicals' because they do not break down easily and can last for decades, if not centuries, in both human bodies and the environment.
What are some common everyday products that may contain PFAS?
-PFAS can be found in a variety of everyday products such as rain jackets, non-stick pans, microwavable popcorn bags, fast food wrappers, cosmetics, dental floss, menstrual products, and items marketed as being resistant to rain, stains, or grease.
What are the potential health risks associated with exposure to PFAS?
-Exposure to PFAS has been linked to a range of health issues including increased risk of certain diseases, lower fertility or birth weight, a compromised immune system, and reduced vaccine response in children.
How widespread is the use of PFAS in consumer products?
-PFAS is used in a vast array of consumer products, and the chemicals are so pervasive that they are almost impossible to avoid. They are found in thousands of different types of products, many of which do not disclose their presence on the label.
What is the Canadian proposal to regulate 'forever chemicals'?
-The Canadian proposal to regulate 'forever chemicals' involves taking steps to limit the use of PFAS and their related groups, which are recognized as cancer-causing and harmful to both the environment and human health.
What did the investigation reveal about the presence of PFAS in makeup products?
-The investigation found that out of eight cosmetics tested, five contained PFAS. Notably, all three samples of Mac foundation tested positive for PFAS, as did Quo eyeshadow and Marcelle foundation and eyeliner.
What are some of the sources of PFAS contamination in the environment?
-PFAS contamination can come from various sources including industrial waste, firefighting foam, and even products that are discarded and end up in landfills. In the case of Stoneridge Farms, the contamination originated from sludge used as fertilizer, which contained high levels of PFAS.
What actions are being taken to address the issue of PFAS contamination?
-Efforts to address PFAS contamination include legal action against manufacturers, stricter regulations on the use of PFAS in consumer products, and increased scientific research to better understand the extent of the problem and potential solutions.
What is the role of the Cosmetic Alliance in the issue of PFAS in cosmetics?
-The Cosmetic Alliance represents the interests of many makeup makers in Canada. They are involved in discussions about the presence of PFAS in cosmetics and work towards reducing levels of these chemicals in products, acknowledging that the industry needs to move towards eliminating PFAS wherever possible.
What are the long-term impacts of PFAS on the environment and human health?
-The long-term impacts of PFAS are significant and far-reaching. They can contaminate water supplies, harm wildlife, and lead to serious health issues in humans, including cancer and immune system disorders. The persistence of these chemicals means that they can accumulate in the environment and in human bodies over time, leading to a multigenerational impact.
What is the significance of the Maine case in the fight against PFAS?
-The Maine case is significant because it represents a proactive legal stance against PFAS manufacturers. The state's Attorney General is suing chemical corporations for the damage caused by these chemicals, despite the corporations' claims of not operating manufacturing facilities in the state. Maine is also leading the way in the U.S. by planning to ban PFAS in all consumer products by 2030.
Outlines
🧪 The Hidden Dangers of PFAS in Everyday Products
This paragraph discusses the pervasive issue of PFAS, a group of persistent chemicals found in everyday products such as rain jackets, non-stick pans, and cosmetics. The segment highlights the concerns of David, a professor, and Miriam Diamond, a crusader against these 'forever chemicals,' which can contaminate drinking water and last for generations. The segment also reveals the results of tests conducted on makeup products from various brands, some of which contain PFAS, despite companies claiming they do not add it as an ingredient. The presence of banned PFAS in some products indicates a violation of regulations, though it's not necessarily intentional. The segment emphasizes the need for stricter regulations and the urgency for the industry to move towards safer alternatives.
🌿 Environmental Contamination and its Impact on Local Communities
This paragraph delves into the environmental impact of PFAS, focusing on how these chemicals seep into land and water, contaminating various ecosystems. The story of Lake Niapenco in Ontario is used as a case study, where high levels of PFAS contamination have been found. The segment also explores the devastating effects of PFAS on local communities, such as the fishing industry and farmers, including Fred Stone's dairy farm, where the milk was deemed unsafe due to PFAS contamination. The emotional and financial toll on these individuals and their livelihoods is highlighted, emphasizing the urgent need for action to address PFAS contamination.
🚫 The Challenge of Regulating and Eliminating PFAS
This paragraph examines the challenges of regulating PFAS, given the vast number of chemicals in this group and their persistence in the environment. It discusses the difficulty in tracing the sources of PFAS contamination, which can include water, piping, packaging, and other ingredients. The segment also addresses the issue of PFAS in cosmetics, where the presence of these chemicals is not intentional but rather a byproduct of the manufacturing process. The conversation with Darren Praznik, the CEO of the Cosmetic Alliance, underscores the industry's efforts to reduce PFAS levels and the need for stricter regulations. The segment calls for a maximum acceptable PFAS level in products and suggests looking for non-water-resistant cosmetics as a way to avoid PFAS.
🌾 The Legacy of PFAS on Agriculture and the Call for Change
This paragraph focuses on the long-term legacy of PFAS on agriculture, particularly in the case of a dairy farm in Maine and two organic farms. The farmers discuss the devastating impact of PFAS-contaminated fertilizer on their businesses and personal health. The segment also touches on the legal actions taken by Maine's Attorney General against PFAS manufacturers for their role in creating and selling these toxic chemicals. The call for stronger regulations and a complete ban on PFAS in consumer products by 2030 in Maine is highlighted, as well as the hope that this will serve as a wake-up call for other jurisdictions, including Canada, to take proactive steps in addressing PFAS contamination.
📜 The Urgency for Government Action on PFAS Regulation
The final paragraph emphasizes the urgency for government action in regulating PFAS. It discusses the ongoing efforts by Health Canada to reduce exposure to PFAS in drinking water and sludge, and the decision-making process regarding the classification of PFAS as harmful to human health in consumer products. The segment criticizes the chemical industry's tactic of delaying regulation by calling for more studies, stressing that the persistence of PFAS in the environment means that waiting for more evidence is not a viable option. The call to end PFAS use, as advocated by experts like Miriam Diamond, is highlighted, along with the need for the government to take swift and decisive action to protect public health and the environment.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡PFAS
💡Chemical Exposure
💡Environmental Contamination
💡Health Risks
💡Regulation
💡Consumer Products
💡Toxicity
💡Persistence
💡Manufacturing Process
💡Supply Chain
💡Environmental Chemistry
Highlights
Everyday products are filled with potential harm due to artificial chemicals that are persistent and almost impossible to break down.
PFAS, a group of up to 12,000 different types of chemicals, are found in a wide range of products from rain jackets to cosmetics due to their water, stain, or grease-resistant properties.
PFAS chemicals are highly persistent, meaning they can last for decades, if not centuries, and are a concern for health and environmental issues.
Miriam Diamond, a professor at the University of Toronto, warns about the dangers of 'forever chemicals' and their potential to contaminate drinking water for future generations.
Evidence suggests that chemical companies have known about the dangers of PFAS for decades but did not disclose this information to the public.
PFAS exposure is linked to certain diseases, lower fertility or birth weight, compromised immune systems, and reduced vaccine response in children.
Identifying which brands use PFAS in their products is difficult as these chemicals are not required to be listed on labels.
The presence of fluorine, a possible marker of PFAS, is detected in cosmetics through testing conducted by the University of Notre Dame.
PFAS chemicals were found in products from popular brands such as Mac, Marcelle, Quo, and Burt's Bees, raising concerns about their widespread use in everyday makeup.
The Cosmetic Alliance acknowledges the presence of PFAS in cosmetics but suggests it may not be intentionally added, indicating potential contamination during the manufacturing process.
Banned PFAS chemicals were discovered in some tested cosmetics, but their presence does not necessarily mean a violation of regulations if not intentionally added.
The industry is moving towards using alternatives to PFAS, but the process of eliminating these chemicals from the supply chain is complex and ongoing.
The presence of PFAS in products and the environment is a call to action for stricter regulations and a shift away from using these 'forever chemicals'.
Maine is taking legal action against PFAS manufacturers for the contamination they've caused, leading the way in addressing the harmful impact of these chemicals.
By 2030, PFAS will be banned in all consumer products in Maine, setting a precedent for other jurisdictions to follow in managing the risks associated with 'forever chemicals'.
Health Canada is working on reducing exposure to PFAS in drinking water and sludge, but there is a call for quicker action and a comprehensive ban on PFAS in consumer products.
The real-time experiment of PFAS exposure on human health and the environment cannot wait for more studies; immediate action is needed to mitigate the potential risks.
Transcripts
Browse More Related Video
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Thanks for rating: