The Simplest Math Problem No One Can Solve - Collatz Conjecture

Veritasium

30 Jul 202122:09

EducationalLearning

32 Likes 10 Comments

TLDRThis video explores the enigmatic Collatz conjecture, a simple mathematical puzzle that remains unsolved despite its apparent simplicity. It describes the process of applying a set of rules to any positive integer, which, according to the conjecture, will inevitably lead to a repeating loop of 4, 2, 1. Despite exhaustive testing up to 2^68 numbers, no counterexample has been found, yet a formal proof eludes mathematicians. The video highlights the intrigue and difficulty of the problem, featuring insights from experts, attempts at visualization, and the broader implications of the conjecture on our understanding of mathematics. It underscores the beauty and challenge of mathematics, inviting viewers to ponder the mysteries that simple numbers can present.

Takeaways

🔥 The Collatz conjecture, involving a simple operation on any positive integer that has baffled mathematicians for decades, suggests that every number eventually falls into a 4, 2, 1 loop.
👨‍🎓 Famous mathematician Paul Erdős believed that mathematics was not yet advanced enough to solve the Collatz conjecture.
📚 The conjecture has many names, including the 3N+1 problem, Ulam conjecture, and Syracuse problem, illustrating its widespread intrigue and the variety of communities that have engaged with it.
🤔 Hailstone numbers, generated through the conjecture's process, display erratic behavior, ascending and descending unpredictably, much like hailstones in a thundercloud.
📈 Applying the conjecture's rules to numbers demonstrates patterns of geometric Brownian motion, similar to stock market fluctuations, indicating a blend of randomness and deterministic decline.
📉 Analysis of leading digits in hailstone sequences adheres to Benford's law, a principle found across various datasets, reinforcing the conjecture's connection to broader mathematical and real-world phenomena.
🚨 Despite exhaustive testing up to very large numbers, no counterexample to the conjecture has been found, increasing confidence in its truth yet without providing a definitive proof.
🔬 Efforts to prove the conjecture have shown that almost all sequences eventually fall below their starting point, hinting at the conjecture's validity without conclusively proving it.
❓ The possibility remains that the Collatz conjecture could be false, undecidable, or true but unprovable with current mathematical tools, reflecting the deep complexity of seemingly simple problems.
📊 Terry Tao's work, showing that almost all numbers end up smaller than any arbitrary function of x, represents significant progress towards understanding the conjecture, yet stops short of proving it.

Q & A

What is the Collatz conjecture?
-The Collatz conjecture posits that applying a simple rule set (multiply odd numbers by three and add one, divide even numbers by two) to any positive integer will eventually lead to a repeating loop of 4, 2, 1.
Why did Paul Erdos say mathematics is not yet ripe enough for such questions?
-Paul Erdos believed that mathematics had not developed sufficiently to tackle the complexity of the Collatz conjecture, indicating the problem's deep and elusive nature.
What are hailstone numbers?
-Hailstone numbers refer to the values generated in the sequence when applying the 3x+1 rule, named for their characteristic rise and fall patterns, similar to hailstones in a storm.
How does the path of the number 27 in the Collatz conjecture sequence compare to others?
-The number 27 undergoes a notably erratic journey in its Collatz sequence, climbing to a peak higher than Mount Everest (9,232) before eventually falling to the loop of 4, 2, 1, taking 111 steps in total.
What is geometric Brownian motion and how is it related to the Collatz conjecture?
-Geometric Brownian motion refers to random fluctuations with a general trend, akin to stock market movements. It's used to describe the logarithmic progression of numbers in the Collatz sequence, highlighting their randomness yet overall downward trend.
What is Benford's law and its connection to the Collatz conjecture?
-Benford's law predicts the frequency of leading digits in many naturally occurring datasets. In the context of the Collatz conjecture, sequences adhere to Benford's law, suggesting a natural statistical pattern in their distribution.
Why is proving the Collatz conjecture challenging?
-The Collatz conjecture is difficult to prove due to its simplicity and the erratic behavior of its sequences. Despite extensive testing and partial progress, no definitive proof has been established, and counterexamples or undecidability remain possibilities.
What significant progress has Terry Tao made towards solving the Collatz conjecture?
-Terry Tao proved that almost all numbers in the Collatz sequence will eventually become smaller than any arbitrary function that increases to infinity, bringing significant insight into the behavior of these sequences.
How does including negative numbers affect the Collatz conjecture?
-Including negative numbers introduces additional loops independent of the primary 4, 2, 1 loop, suggesting a different dynamic and structure on the negative side of the number line.
What does the vast testing of numbers up to 2^68 imply about the Collatz conjecture?
-Testing numbers up to 2^68 without finding a counterexample suggests the conjecture may hold true for all numbers. However, this still falls short of a mathematical proof and does not eliminate the possibility of undiscovered loops or divergent sequences.

Outlines

00:00

🧮 The Enigma of the Collatz Conjecture

This segment introduces the Collatz conjecture, a seemingly simple mathematical problem that has puzzled mathematicians for decades. Despite its straightforward rules—multiplying odd numbers by three and adding one, and halving even numbers—the conjecture's solution remains elusive. It suggests that any starting number will eventually fall into a 4-2-1 loop, yet this has never been proven. The narrative highlights the skepticism within the mathematical community, where working on the Collatz conjecture is seen as a potentially career-damaging folly, illustrating the problem's notorious reputation.

05:00

🔢 Unpredictable Patterns and Benford's Law

This section explores the unpredictable nature of the sequences generated by the Collatz conjecture, known as hailstone numbers, and their wide-ranging paths. Despite adjacent numbers sometimes having vastly different sequences, a pattern emerges when examining the leading digits of these numbers across many sequences. This pattern aligns with Benford's Law, which is observed in various natural phenomena and used in fraud detection. However, the segment emphasizes that Benford's Law does not provide insight into the conjecture's central question—whether all numbers indeed fall into the 4-2-1 loop.

10:02

🔍 Mathematical Efforts and Potential Counterexamples

This part delves into the extensive efforts by mathematicians to test the Collatz conjecture, with every number up to 2^68 adhering to the predicted behavior. Despite these tests, the conjecture remains unproven, and the possibility of counterexamples—or numbers that do not follow the expected pattern—remains. The narrative discusses various attempts to analyze the conjecture, including visualizations and statistical approaches, revealing the complexity and unpredictability of the problem. The segment also touches on the potential for undecidability, suggesting that the conjecture's truth may be inherently unprovable.

15:03

🧐 The Perplexing Nature of Numbers

The final segment reflects on the philosophical implications of the Collatz conjecture, questioning the inherent nature of numbers and mathematical truth. It highlights the vastness of the numbers not yet tested against the conjecture and the possibility that a counterexample exists beyond our current computational reach. This contemplation emphasizes the limitations of human knowledge and the enduring mysteries within mathematics, underscoring the conjecture's role in illustrating the complexities and unexpected behaviors of numbers.

20:04

🎓 The Collatz Conjecture and Continuous Learning

This concluding paragraph emphasizes the accessibility of the Collatz conjecture to a broad audience, allowing anyone to engage with and ponder its complexities. It promotes the idea of learning through exploration and problem-solving, endorsing an educational platform as a means to deepen understanding of mathematical fundamentals. The narrative encourages a proactive approach to learning, highlighting the value of challenging oneself to foster growth and discovery in mathematics and beyond.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Collatz Conjecture

The Collatz Conjecture, also known as the 3x+1 problem, is a mathematical hypothesis proposing that for any positive integer, if you follow a simple set of rules (multiply odd numbers by 3 and add 1, halve even numbers), the sequence produced will eventually reach the loop 4, 2, 1. This conjecture remains unproven despite extensive testing and is highlighted in the script as a quintessential example of a simple yet unsolved problem in mathematics, illustrating the limits of current mathematical understanding and the challenge of proving or disproving seemingly straightforward propositions.

💡Hailstone Numbers

Hailstone numbers are the sequence of numbers generated by applying the rules of the Collatz Conjecture. The script refers to them as 'hailstone numbers' because their values fluctuate upwards and downwards, much like hailstones in a storm, before eventually falling down to one. This metaphor vividly captures the unpredictable and chaotic nature of the sequences generated by the 3x+1 problem.

💡Geometric Brownian Motion

Geometric Brownian Motion is a mathematical model used to describe random processes that fluctuate continuously over time. The script draws an analogy between this concept and the behavior of hailstone numbers under the Collatz Conjecture, suggesting that the ups and downs of hailstone sequences resemble the random wiggles of stock market prices. This comparison is used to explain the inherent randomness in the paths of numbers as they eventually trend towards the loop of 4, 2, 1.

💡Benford's Law

Benford's Law is a statistical phenomenon that predicts the frequency distribution of the first digits in many real-life sets of numerical data. In the context of the Collatz Conjecture, the script mentions that the leading digits of hailstone numbers follow Benford's Law, further illustrating the intriguing mathematical properties of the sequences generated by the 3x+1 problem and their connection to broader mathematical principles.

💡Directed Graph

A directed graph is a collection of nodes connected by edges, where each edge has a direction associated with it. In the script, directed graphs are used to visualize the sequences generated by applying the Collatz Conjecture to different starting numbers. This visualization helps to illustrate the complexity and interconnectedness of the sequences, as well as the conjecture's implication that all positive integers are part of a single, vast network leading to the 4, 2, 1 loop.

💡Terry Tao

Terry Tao is mentioned in the script as one of the world's greatest living mathematicians, who has contributed significant insights into the Collatz Conjecture. His work, which showed that almost all numbers will end up smaller than any arbitrary function of x that goes to infinity, represents a substantial advancement towards understanding the conjecture, highlighting the ongoing efforts of mathematicians to probe this deceptively simple problem.

💡Geometric Mean

The geometric mean is a type of average that is calculated by multiplying all the numbers in a set together and then taking the nth root (where n is the number of values in the set). The script uses this concept to explain how, on average, the process of applying the 3x+1 rules results in sequences that tend to decrease over time, despite the initial expectation that sequences might grow indefinitely.

💡Undecidability

Undecidability refers to the concept in computational theory that there are problems which cannot be conclusively resolved as either true or false by any algorithm. The script speculates about the possibility that the Collatz Conjecture might be undecidable, suggesting that, like the halting problem, it may be fundamentally impossible to prove or disprove the conjecture definitively with our current mathematical tools.

💡Counterexamples

In mathematics, a counterexample is an instance or case that disproves a conjecture or theorem. The script discusses the search for counterexamples to the Collatz Conjecture as a critical yet largely unexplored avenue for disproving it. This highlights the open-ended nature of mathematical exploration and the importance of considering all possibilities when tackling unsolved problems.

💡Brute Force Testing

Brute force testing refers to the straightforward but computationally intensive approach of checking all possible cases to verify a conjecture. The script mentions that every number up to 2^68 has been tested without finding any exceptions to the Collatz Conjecture, illustrating both the impressive scope of human effort invested in this problem and the limitations of brute force methods in proving mathematical conjectures.

Highlights

The Collatz conjecture, a simple yet unsolved problem in mathematics, involves a sequence where numbers eventually loop at 4, 2, 1.

Paul Erdos commented on the complexity of the conjecture, suggesting mathematics was not advanced enough to tackle it.

The sequence's behavior, increasing or decreasing based on being odd or even, has puzzled mathematicians for decades.

Despite its simplicity, the conjecture has resisted proof by the world's leading mathematicians.

Hailstone numbers, named for their rising and falling pattern, are central to understanding the conjecture's dynamics.

Mathematicians have explored the conjecture's randomness and patterns without definitive conclusions.

Jeffrey Lagarias is identified as a leading authority on the Collatz conjecture.

The potential for the conjecture to exhibit random-like behavior, similar to geometric Brownian motion.

Benford's law's application to the distribution of leading digits in hailstone sequences.

Statistical approaches suggest sequences tend to shrink over time, challenging initial assumptions of growth.

Visualizations of the conjecture's pathways reveal intricate, organic-like structures.

The possibility of the conjecture being false, with undiscovered loops or infinite sequences.

Negative numbers introduce additional loops, complicating the conjecture's behavior further.

Terry Tao's contributions represent significant progress, though not a complete solution.

The conjecture's potential undecidability, highlighted by John Conway's work, suggests it may never be conclusively resolved.

Transcripts

Browse More Related Video

Poincaré Conjecture - Numberphile

Why π^π^π^π could be an integer (for all we know!).

Group theory, abstraction, and the 196,883-dimensional monster

The Mandelbrot Set: Atheists’ WORST Nightmare

The Oldest Unsolved Problem in Math

What happens at infinity? - The Cantor set