High Value Man REFUSES To Pay Child Support After She DENIES DNA Test
TLDRThe video script discusses the complexities and potential injustices within the child support system, highlighting the story of a man who unknowingly signed an acknowledgement of paternity and faced severe financial and personal consequences. It emphasizes the importance of DNA testing to establish paternity and criticizes the profit-driven nature of the system, urging for reforms and mandatory paternity tests at birth to prevent such cases.
Takeaways
- 📝 The speaker discusses the legal and financial implications of signing an Acknowledgement of Paternity without being certain of paternity, highlighting the potential for garnished wages and homelessness.
- 💰 California made $430 million from child support payments in 2020, illustrating the scale of the financial system involved in family law.
- 🏠 The speaker shares a personal story of being homeless due to wage garnishment for child support payments they dispute.
- 👶 The court case of Giovani Lee emphasizes the importance of DNA testing to establish paternity before enforcing child support obligations.
- 🤝 The script mentions workplace affairs and the complexities they introduce into child support and paternity cases.
- 👨👩👧👦 The acknowledgment of paternity can have long-term consequences, even if it is later discovered that the signer is not the biological father.
- 🧬 The necessity of DNA testing is underscored as a means to prevent men from being wrongly held responsible for child support.
- 🏛️ The legal system is criticized for not mandating DNA tests and for allowing financial incentives that may not align with the best interests of the child.
- 💼 The federal government reimburses states for a portion of the child support collected, suggesting a financial incentive for states in the enforcement of child support.
- 📉 The speaker argues for the need to reform child support laws, including advocating for mandatory paternity testing at birth to prevent injustices.
- 📈 Statistics are presented to show the financial burden and potential profit from child support enforcement, suggesting systemic issues within the current system.
Q & A
What was the main issue in the court case involving Brewington versus Lee?
-The main issue was the determination of paternity and the obligation of child support for three-year-old Giovani Lee, where Mr. Lee was accused of not being the biological father.
How much did the state of California make from child support payments in the year 2020?
-The state of California made $430 million from child support payments in the year 2020.
What financial difficulties did the speaker experience due to child support garnishment?
-The speaker experienced homelessness, inability to pay rent, and a severely disrupted life due to 66% and 13% of their checks being garnished for child support.
What was the court's decision regarding the child support case before DNA testing was conducted?
-The court decided that Mr. Lee needed to take a DNA test to confirm paternity before any child support obligations could be established.
What was the speaker's reaction to being accused of infidelity during the court proceedings?
-The speaker admitted to the affair but denied the insinuation of further infidelity, expressing that they had been open about their marital status after the relationship began.
Why did Mr. Lee refuse to pay child support before the DNA test?
-Mr. Lee wanted to be certain that he was the biological father of the child before taking on any child support obligations, as he was not the only person involved with the mother at the time.
What is the role of the Attorney General's office in facilitating DNA tests in this context?
-The Attorney General's office is responsible for conducting the DNA tests, making the process easier and free of charge for the parties involved.
What was the speaker's opinion on the woman's attempt to involve the speaker's marital status in the court case?
-The speaker felt that the woman was trying to use the marital status to embarrass him and influence the court's decision in her favor.
What statistics did the speaker mention about the child support system in the United States?
-The speaker mentioned that all 50 states collected about $32-33 billion in child support payments, with California alone making $430 million, and that the federal government reimburses states 66% of the child support they collect.
What was the speaker's experience with the legal repercussions of signing the Acknowledgement of Paternity (AOP) without a DNA test?
-The speaker discovered that signing the AOP could legally hold them responsible for a child even if they later found out they were not the biological parent, which led to a lengthy and difficult legal battle.
What advocacy does the speaker suggest for addressing issues with the child support and paternity testing system?
-The speaker advocates for mandatory paternity tests at birth and pushing local and state officials to change existing laws related to child support and paternity testing.
Outlines
👶 Paternity Dispute and Child Support Dilemma
The first paragraph of the script centers around a complex paternity and child support case. A man is taken to court by a woman claiming he is the father of her three-year-old child, Giovani Lee. The court is informed that the man has been homeless due to wage garnishment for child support payments he has been making without confirmation of paternity. The woman accuses the man of avoiding responsibility, while he insists on a DNA test to confirm his biological relation to the child. The court orders a DNA test before proceeding with child support obligations, highlighting the importance of establishing paternity before financial obligations are set.
🧑⚖️ Courtroom Drama and the Reality of Child Support
The second paragraph delves into the courtroom proceedings and the broader implications of child support systems. The judge orders a DNA test to ascertain paternity, emphasizing the necessity of proof before any financial responsibilities are assigned. The script also touches on the personal and financial struggles faced by individuals due to the child support system, including homelessness and wage garnishment. It criticizes the system for not ensuring that child support payments reach the child and for the profit-driven nature of the system, with states like California making significant revenue from these payments. The speaker calls for mandatory DNA tests to prevent men from being unjustly burdened with child support for children who are not biologically theirs.
📊 The Impact of Child Support Laws and the Call for Reform
The final paragraph presents a personal account of a man who faced severe repercussions after signing an acknowledgment of paternity without a DNA test, leading to a long legal battle. It underscores the emotional and financial toll of being wrongly identified as a child's father and the difficulty of overturning such a legal commitment. The speaker shares statistics about child support collections in the U.S., the profit states make from these payments, and the federal government's reimbursement to states. The narrative calls for advocacy and legal reform to ensure that paternity is confirmed through DNA testing at birth, to prevent men from being unjustly held responsible for child support.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Acknowledgement of Paternity
💡Child Support
💡DNA Test
💡Paternity
💡Garnishment
💡Affair
💡Homelessness
💡Legal Father
💡Court
💡Financial Documents
💡Attorney General's Office
Highlights
California made $430 million from child support payments in 2020.
The individual faced homelessness due to wage garnishment for child support.
In the Brewington vs. Lee case, the court determined Mr. Lee was not the father.
The importance of DNA testing to confirm paternity before child support obligations.
The woman in the case refused to provide a DNA test.
The court ordered a DNA test before proceeding with child support.
The man was in denial about his affair and its consequences.
The woman claimed the man was married and used it against him in court.
The man admitted to being married but claimed the child might not be his.
The court suggested the woman might be more interested in the man's money than child support.
The man was advised to take a DNA test to confirm paternity.
The court highlighted the need for proof of paternity before child support can be enforced.
The man faced a 5-year legal battle over a paternity and child support lawsuit.
The legal system's challenges in proving non-paternity despite DNA evidence.
The man's experience of being homeless due to wage garnishment for alleged child support.
The call for mandatory paternity testing at birth to prevent legal and financial injustices.
The video's advocacy for changing child support laws to include paternity tests at birth.
Transcripts
Browse More Related Video
MANDATORY PATERNITY Test Law Passed Got MODERN WOMAN PISSED
What Family Lawyers Say About Paternity Fraud
The Hidden Side of Paternity Fraud
Paternity Fraud Will Soon Land You In Jail | House Bill 2689
Paternity Fraud, The Truth - EVERY Man Must Watch This
Forensic accountant explains why fraud thrives on Wall Street
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Thanks for rating: