How to Argue - Philosophical Reasoning: Crash Course Philosophy #2

CrashCourse
16 Feb 201609:43
EducationalLearning
32 Likes 10 Comments

TLDRIn this Crash Course Philosophy episode, the importance of rationality as a defining human trait is explored, contrasting it with irrational behaviors. The script delves into the art of argumentation, highlighting the difference between everyday persuasion and philosophical reasoning. It introduces Plato's tripartite soul concept and the significance of reason over emotion and desire. Furthermore, it explains deductive arguments, emphasizing the necessity of sound premises for valid reasoning, using the barber paradox to illustrate logical consistency. The episode encourages mastering argumentation to enhance persuasive abilities and critical thinking.

Takeaways
  • 📚 Aristotle described humans as 'the rational animal', emphasizing rationality as a distinguishing human characteristic.
  • 🗣️ People often engage in arguments in daily life, but may not approach them with the same rigor as philosophers.
  • 🧠 Plato's concept of a tripartite soul includes the rational, spirited, and appetitive parts, suggesting that the rational part should ideally govern the others.
  • 🐖 The appetitive part of the soul is shared with animals and drives basic desires like eating and self-preservation.
  • 🤔 Philosophers believe that reason should guide human actions, and that good reasoning can be tested through thought experiments and puzzles.
  • 💡 Bertrand Russell's barber paradox illustrates the logical inconsistencies that can arise when a group's definition does not include itself.
  • 🔍 Deductive arguments are a type of reasoning where the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion.
  • 🔗 In deductive reasoning, the relationship between premises and conclusion is called entailment, where the conclusion logically follows from the premises.
  • ❌ Invalid arguments may have true premises and conclusions but fail to establish a logical connection between them.
  • 🔍 Validity in arguments refers to the logical structure where if the premises are true, the conclusion cannot be false, but this does not guarantee the truth of the premises themselves.
  • 📈 The goal in philosophical reasoning is to achieve sound arguments, where the premises are true and the argument is valid, ensuring the conclusion is necessarily true.
Q & A

  • What did Aristotle describe humans as?

    -Aristotle described humans as 'the rational animal,' emphasizing that rationality is the distinguishing characteristic that sets humans apart from other animals.

  • Why is rationality considered important in arguments?

    -Rationality is important in arguments because it allows people to be persuaded by logical reasoning rather than just emotional reactions or loud assertions, making the arguments more convincing and persuasive.

  • What is the tripartite soul according to Plato?

    -The tripartite soul, as described by Plato, consists of three parts: the rational or logical part, the spirited part, and the appetitive part. The rational part seeks truth and is swayed by facts and arguments, the spirited part is about emotions and actions, and the appetitive part drives physical desires and self-preservation.

  • How does Plato view the best human beings?

    -Plato believed that the best human beings are those who are ruled by the rational part of their soul, as it keeps the spirited and appetitive parts in check, leading to a more balanced and virtuous life.

  • What is the barber paradox presented by Bertrand Russell?

    -The barber paradox is a thought experiment where a town has a barber who shaves all men who do not shave themselves and does not shave those who do. The paradox arises when considering whether the barber shaves himself, leading to a logical inconsistency.

  • What is the purpose of the barber paradox in the script?

    -The barber paradox is used to illustrate the importance of logical consistency in arguments and to show that a group must always be a member of itself, highlighting the necessity for sound reasoning in philosophy.

  • What is an argument in philosophical terms?

    -In philosophical terms, an argument is a set of statements, called premises, that provide evidence for a belief, leading to a conclusion. It is not merely a verbal dispute but a structured reasoning process.

  • What is a deductive argument?

    -A deductive argument is a type of reasoning where if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. It is a form of logical reasoning that moves from general premises to a specific conclusion.

  • What is the difference between validity and soundness in arguments?

    -Validity in an argument means that if the premises are true, the conclusion cannot be false. Soundness, on the other hand, refers to an argument that is not only valid but also has all true premises, ensuring the conclusion is guaranteed to be true.

  • Why are deductive arguments valued in philosophy?

    -Deductive arguments are valued in philosophy because they can provide certainty. If the premises are true and the argument is valid, the conclusion must also be true, offering a reliable method for establishing truths.

  • What is the role of premises in an argument?

    -Premises in an argument serve as the foundation that supports the conclusion. They provide the evidence or reasons that justify the belief expressed in the conclusion, forming the structure of the argument.

Outlines
00:00
🤓 The Importance of Rationality and Arguments

This paragraph introduces the concept of rationality as a defining human characteristic, contrasting it with the irrationality often displayed in debates about religion, politics, or personal preferences. It emphasizes the importance of using logical arguments to persuade others, rather than relying on emotional outbursts or witty comebacks. The narrator suggests that understanding and mastering the art of argumentation can make one more persuasive and influential, which is beneficial in various aspects of life. The historical context is provided by mentioning Plato and his views on reason, setting the stage for a deeper exploration of philosophical reasoning.

05:01
📚 Deductive Arguments and Their Structure

This paragraph delves into the structure and principles of deductive arguments, a fundamental aspect of philosophical reasoning. It explains that deductive arguments are built on premises that, if true, necessarily lead to a true conclusion. The narrator uses the example of human mortality to illustrate how deductive reasoning works, showing how specific conclusions can be logically derived from general premises. The paragraph also discusses the difference between a valid argument (where the premises entail the conclusion) and a sound argument (where the premises are true and the argument is valid). It highlights the importance of having true premises to ensure the soundness of an argument, and the limitations of deductive reasoning due to the rarity of having indisputably true premises.

Mindmap
Keywords
💡Rationality
Rationality refers to the ability to think and act in accordance with reason and logic. In the video, it is presented as a defining human characteristic that distinguishes us from animals, as Aristotle suggested. The script uses rationality to discuss the importance of logical argumentation in persuading others, contrasting it with emotional or instinctual reactions.
💡Argument
In the context of the video, an argument is a set of statements or reasons intended to persuade others to accept a particular point of view or to act in a certain way. The script emphasizes that while people often use arguments in everyday life, philosophers approach them with a focus on logical structure and sound reasoning, rather than emotional appeals or loudness.
💡Deductive Argument
A deductive argument is a type of logical reasoning where the conclusion is necessarily true if the premises are true. The video script provides an example of a deductive argument with premises about human mortality and Socrates being human, leading to the conclusion that Socrates is mortal. It is a key concept in the video's discussion of logical reasoning and the pursuit of certainty in arguments.
💡Premise
A premise is a statement or proposition that forms the basis for an argument or inference. The script explains that in a philosophical argument, premises are the evidence supporting the conclusion. They are crucial for building a valid deductive argument, as they must all be true for the argument to be sound.
💡Conclusion
The conclusion is the final statement or judgment that is derived from the premises of an argument. In the video, the conclusion is what the arguer believes based on the premises provided. It is highlighted that in a deductive argument, if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true, which is a key aspect of logical reasoning.
💡Entailment
Entailment in logic refers to the relationship between statements where the truth of one requires the truth of another. The script uses the term to describe how the premises in a deductive argument lead to the conclusion, such as knowing that all humans are mortal and that Socrates is human entails that Socrates is mortal.
💡Validity
Validity in the context of arguments refers to the logical structure where if the premises are true, the conclusion cannot be false. The video script explains that an argument is valid if the reasoning is sound and the conclusion follows logically from the premises, regardless of whether the premises are actually true.
💡Soundness
Soundness in logic is the property of an argument being both valid and having all true premises, ensuring that the conclusion is necessarily true. The script emphasizes the importance of sound arguments in philosophy, as they represent the ideal of logical reasoning without flaws.
💡Tripartite Soul
The tripartite soul is a concept by Plato, dividing the human soul into three parts: the rational, spirited, and appetitive. The video script uses this concept to illustrate the different aspects of human motivation and how they relate to reason, emotion, and physical desires, respectively.
💡Barber Paradox
The Barber Paradox, introduced by Bertrand Russell, is a logical puzzle presented in the video to illustrate the concept of self-reference and the potential for logical inconsistencies. The script uses the paradox to discuss the necessity of a group including itself and the implications for logical reasoning.
💡Persuasion
Persuasion in the video is the act of convincing others to adopt a belief or take a particular action through the use of arguments. The script suggests that learning about arguments and reasoning can make one a more persuasive person, which is beneficial in various aspects of life beyond philosophy.
Highlights

Aristotle described humans as 'the rational animal', emphasizing rationality as a distinguishing characteristic.

Rationality is what sets humans apart from beasts, as people can generally be persuaded by arguments.

Arguments are used in everyday life, such as convincing parents or friends, but most people are not adept at constructing solid arguments.

Learning about arguments and strong reasoning can make one a better philosopher and a more persuasive person.

Plato's concept of a tripartite soul includes the rational, spirited, and appetitive parts, with the rational part being the most important.

The rational part of the soul seeks truth and is swayed by facts and arguments, while the spirited part is driven by emotions and actions.

The appetitive part of the soul is shared with animals and is driven by basic desires and protections.

Plato believed that the best human beings are ruled by the rational part of their soul, keeping the spirited and appetitive parts in check.

Modern philosophers agree with Plato that reason should be the guiding force in human behavior.

Bertrand Russell's barber paradox illustrates the logical inconsistency in a group that must include itself.

A deductive argument is one where if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.

Deductive reasoning begins with general facts and reasons down to specific conclusions.

An argument is valid if the truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion.

Validity does not guarantee the truth of the premises or the conclusion, only that if the premises are true, the conclusion cannot be false.

A deductively sound argument is one that is both valid and has all true premises, ensuring the conclusion is true.

Deductive arguments provide certainty but are limited by the need for known true premises.

The value of reason, the structure of arguments, and deductive reasoning were discussed in this episode.

Transcripts

Browse More Related Video

TIPS For Teaching ARGUMENT BUILDING

Claim, Evidence, and Reasoning, Oh My!

Why most people are bad at mathematics - Neil deGrasse Tyson asks Richard Dawkins

The Future Of Reasoning

Anselm & the Argument for God: Crash Course Philosophy #9

Calculus Chapter 5 Lecture 50 Infinite Series

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Thanks for rating:

Related Tags
PhilosophyReasoningArgumentsAristotlePlatoSocratesLogicDeductionBarber ParadoxRationality