A/B Testing Analysis Made Easy: How to Use Hypothesis Testing for Data Science Interviews!

Emma Ding
26 Feb 202111:48
EducationalLearning
32 Likes 10 Comments

TLDRThis video tutorial explores the application of hypothesis testing in solving real-world problems, particularly in analyzing A/B testing results. The host provides two detailed examples, explaining step-by-step how to use a Z-test for Bernoulli populations and a two-sample t-test for comparing means with similar variances. The video also discusses the importance of statistical and practical significance in decision-making, guiding viewers on when to recommend launching a feature based on experimental results.

Takeaways
  • 🔍 The video is a tutorial on using hypothesis testing to analyze results of A/B testing in real-world problems.
  • 📚 Part two of a series on hypothesis testing in data science interviews, following up on commonly used tests and their differences.
  • 🎯 The first example discusses an experiment on button color and its effect on click-through probability, with a significant difference to be determined.
  • 📉 The control group has a 1.1% click-through rate, while the treatment group has 2.3%, prompting a hypothesis test for significant difference.
  • 📝 A practical significance boundary of 0.01 and an alpha level of 0.05 are set to assess statistical and practical significance.
  • 🧐 The hypothesis test chosen for the first example is a z-test, appropriate for large Bernoulli populations.
  • 📊 The test statistic is calculated using the estimated probabilities from both groups, with a standard error derived from pooled data.
  • 📈 The result of the z-test shows statistical significance as the test statistic exceeds the critical value for the given alpha level.
  • 🤔 Despite statistical significance, the practical significance is questionable as the confidence interval marginally overlaps the practical boundary.
  • 🚫 The recommendation based on the analysis is not to launch the feature due to uncertainty in practical significance.
  • 📝 The second example involves a t-test to determine if a new feature affects the average number of posts per user, with a significant difference to be assessed.
  • 📊 A two-sample t-test with pooled variance is chosen for the second example, assuming similar variances in both groups.
  • 📈 The t-test result is statistically significant, and the confidence interval does not include zero, indicating a practical difference.
  • 🟢 The recommendation for the second experiment is to launch the feature, as the difference is both statistically and practically significant.
  • 📚 The video also touches on unequal variance t-tests for cases where the sample variances are significantly different.
Q & A

  • What is the main topic of the video?

    -The main topic of the video is how to use hypothesis testing to solve real problems, specifically analyzing the results of A/B testing in data science.

  • What is the purpose of the video in the context of a series?

    -The video is part two of a series on cracking hypothesis testing problems in data science interviews, following up on commonly used hypothesis tests from part one.

  • What metric is being analyzed in the first experiment about the button color?

    -The metric being analyzed is the click-through probability, which is calculated as the number of users who click the button over the total number of users.

  • What are the click-through probabilities for the control and treatment groups in the first experiment?

    -The control group has a 1.1 percent click-through probability, while the treatment group has a 2.3 percent click-through probability.

  • What is the significance of choosing an alpha of 0.05 in the first experiment?

    -Choosing an alpha of 0.05 sets the threshold for statistical significance, meaning that if the test statistic exceeds this value, the null hypothesis can be rejected.

  • What type of hypothesis test is chosen for the first experiment, and why?

    -A z-test is chosen for the first experiment because the data involves large samples from a Bernoulli population, and the test statistic follows a standard normal distribution.

  • How is the estimated difference in probabilities between the control and treatment groups calculated in the first experiment?

    -The estimated difference is calculated by subtracting the estimated probability of the control group from the estimated probability of the treatment group, which results in 0.01.

  • What is the practical significance boundary in the first experiment, and how does it relate to the decision to launch the feature?

    -The practical significance boundary is 0.01, and it is used to determine whether the observed difference in click-through probabilities is large enough to be worth implementing. If the confidence interval does not entirely exceed this boundary, the feature should not be launched.

  • What is the second experiment about, and what is the metric being tested?

    -The second experiment is about testing if adding a new feature changes the average number of posts created per user. The metric being tested is the mean number of posts.

  • What statistical test is used in the second experiment, and under what condition is it appropriate?

    -A two-sample t-test is used in the second experiment, which is appropriate when comparing the means of two groups with similar variances and unknown population variances.

  • What is the conclusion of the second experiment regarding the practical significance of the new feature?

    -The conclusion is that the new feature should be launched because both ends of the confidence interval for the difference in means are greater than the practical significance boundary of 0.05.

  • What is the Welch's t-test, and when should it be used instead of the two-sample t-test with pooled variance?

    -Welch's t-test is used when the two samples have very different variances or sample sizes, and it calculates the standard error and degrees of freedom differently to account for the unequal variances.

Outlines
00:00
🔍 Hypothesis Testing for A/B Testing Analysis

This paragraph introduces the video's focus on using hypothesis testing to address real-world problems, specifically analyzing A/B testing results. The video provides a step-by-step guide on hypothesis testing, including choosing the right test, formulating the null hypothesis, evaluating statistical significance, and assessing practical significance with examples. The first example involves an experiment on button color's effect on click-through probability, comparing two groups with a significant difference in click rates. The practical significance boundary is set at 0.01, with an alpha level of 0.05 for decision-making. The z-test is chosen for analysis due to large sample sizes, and the process includes calculating the test statistic, comparing it with critical values, and making a recommendation based on statistical and practical significance.

05:00
📊 Statistical and Practical Significance in Experiment Results

The second paragraph delves into the statistical significance of an experiment's results and the decision-making process based on those results. It discusses the calculation of the confidence interval and margin of error for the difference in click-through probabilities between two groups. The practical significance boundary is compared with the confidence interval to determine whether the observed change is significant enough to recommend launching a feature. The paragraph also explains how to use the confidence interval to check for statistical significance by comparing it with zero. The discussion moves on to another example involving a new feature's impact on the average number of posts created per user, using a two-sample t-test to compare group means and variances, leading to a recommendation to launch the feature based on the statistically and practically significant difference.

10:02
📚 Advanced Hypothesis Testing Scenarios and Recommendations

The final paragraph addresses more complex hypothesis testing scenarios, such as when sample sizes and variances are significantly different between two groups. It introduces the Welch's t-test as an adaptation of the Student's t-test for such cases, explaining the calculation of the separate variances and the use of a different standard error. The paragraph emphasizes the importance of understanding when to apply different tests and provides a formula for calculating the confidence interval in these scenarios. The video concludes with a summary of the examples covered and an invitation for feedback, reinforcing the importance of hypothesis testing in making informed decisions based on experimental data.

Mindmap
Keywords
💡Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method used to make decisions about the likelihood that a hypothesis is true, based on whether the data supports the hypothesis. In the video, hypothesis testing is the central theme, as it is applied to analyze the results of A/B testing, helping to determine if observed differences between groups are statistically significant. For example, the script discusses using hypothesis testing to decide whether a new button color affects click-through probability.
💡A/B Testing
A/B testing is a user experience research technique where two versions of a product, typically differentiated by a single element, are compared to determine which performs better. In the video, A/B testing is used to compare the click-through probability of a button with different colors, with the aim of understanding if the change in color has a significant impact on user behavior.
💡Click-Through Probability
Click-through probability is a metric that measures the likelihood that a user will click on a given element, such as a button. It is calculated as the number of users who click the button divided by the total number of users. The script uses this metric to evaluate the effectiveness of different button colors in an experiment.
💡Control Group
A control group is a standard or baseline used in an experiment to compare against the group that receives the experimental treatment. In the video, the control group represents the status quo with the original button color, and its click-through rate is compared against the treatment group to assess the impact of the color change.
💡Treatment Group
The treatment group is the group that receives the experimental intervention or change. In the context of the video, the treatment group is presented with a different button color, and its performance is compared to the control group to determine if the new color has a significant effect.
💡Statistical Significance
Statistical significance refers to the likelihood that the observed results of a study are not due to chance. The script discusses determining statistical significance by comparing the test statistic to a critical value, which helps in deciding whether the differences between groups are real or just random variations.
💡Practical Significance
Practical significance is the measure of the real-world impact or importance of the results of a study, beyond just being statistically significant. The video explains how to assess practical significance by comparing the confidence interval of the estimated effect with a predefined practical significance boundary, which helps in making decisions about implementing changes.
💡Z-Test
A Z-test is a statistical test used to determine whether two population proportions are different when the sample size is large enough. In the script, a Z-test is chosen to analyze the difference in click-through probabilities between the control and treatment groups, assuming the sampling distribution of the proportion follows a standard normal distribution.
💡Pooled Standard Error
Pooled standard error is a measure used in hypothesis testing that combines the standard errors of two groups to estimate the standard error of the difference between their means. The script mentions calculating the pooled standard error when the variances of the two groups are assumed to be similar, which is used in a two-sample t-test.
💡Two-Sample T-Test
A two-sample t-test is a statistical test used to compare the means of two groups known or assumed to have unknown but equal population variances. The video script describes using a two-sample t-test to determine if adding a new feature affects the average number of posts created per user, assuming the variances are similar.
💡Unpooled Standard Error
Unpooled standard error is used in situations where the variances of the two groups being compared are not similar. The script explains that when the standard deviations of the two groups are not similar, specifically when one is more than twice the other, the unpooled standard error is used instead of the pooled standard error in hypothesis testing.
Highlights

Introduction to using hypothesis testing to solve real problems, specifically analyzing A/B testing results.

Two examples provided to demonstrate solving hypothesis testing problems step by step.

Part two of a series on hypothesis testing in data science interviews, following up on commonly used tests from part one.

First example involves analyzing the click-through probability of a button color experiment with 1000 users in control and treatment groups.

Control group has a 1.1% click-through probability, while the treatment group has 2.3%.

Decision on whether to launch the experiment based on a practical significance boundary of 0.01 and an alpha of 0.05.

Outline of steps to analyze results including choosing the right hypothesis test, evaluating statistical significance, and making decisions.

Explanation of choosing a z-test for large sample sizes and estimating the difference in probabilities.

Calculation of the pooled standard error for comparing two samples.

Determination of statistical significance by comparing the test statistic with the critical z-score.

Practical significance assessed by comparing the confidence interval with the practical significance boundary.

Recommendation not to launch the feature due to uncertainty in the practical significance of the change.

Second example involves testing the impact of a new feature on the average number of posts created per user.

Control group mean is 1.4, treatment group mean is 2, with similar variances assumed.

Use of a two-sample t-test with pooled variance for comparing differences between control and treatment groups.

Statistical significance determined by comparing the test statistic with the critical t-score for a 95% confidence level.

Recommendation to launch the feature based on the confidence interval exceeding the practical significance boundary.

Introduction of Welch's t-test for cases with very different variances or sample sizes.

Explanation of the formula for calculating the Welch's t-test standard error and degrees of freedom.

Summary of the process for using hypothesis testing in real-world scenarios to make data-driven decisions.

Transcripts

Browse More Related Video

Hypothesis Testing - Difference of Two Means - Student's -Distribution & Normal Distribution

t-Test - Full Course - Everything you need to know

SPSS (9): Mean Comparison Tests | T-tests, ANOVA & Post-Hoc tests

Session 45 - Hypothesis Testing Part 1 | DSMP 2023

Two-Sample t Test in R (Independent Groups) with Example | R Tutorial 4.2 | MarinStatsLectures

What is Effect Size ? Explained in a simple and Easy way

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Thanks for rating:

Related Tags
Hypothesis TestingData ScienceA/B TestingStatistical AnalysisZ-TestT-TestConfidence IntervalPractical SignificanceExperiment AnalysisTutorial Video