Photographers Who Got Caught Cheating
TLDRThe video discusses examples of photographers manipulating or 'cheating' in photo competitions by doing things like cloning out objects or using stuffed animals as subjects. Though some cases seem harmless, like removing a bit of litter, others violated strict contest rules against altering wildlife images. One photographer even used AI-generated images to make a statement about lax screening processes. The narrator seems amused by photographers trying to get away with minor tweaks but expresses respect for prestigious wildlife competitions. Overall, the video explores themes around photo manipulation ethics and how contests determine what crosses the line.
Takeaways
- ๐ฒ Several photographers have been caught manipulating images to try to win photography competitions
- ๐ก There are strict rules against image manipulation in most major photography competitions
- ๐ค Some minor edits like cloning out distractions may be more acceptable
- ๐ Swapping an animal's ears is clearly cheating
- ๐ The plane edit was pretty funny/cheeky
- ๐ซ Wildlife photography competitions have very strict rules against manipulation
- ๐ Using a trained wolf instead of a wild wolf is seriously cheating
- ๐ฎ AI generated images are causing issues in photo competitions
- ๐คจ Judges wrongly accused a real photo of being AI generated
- ๐ Photographers may have to prove their images are not AI going forward
Q & A
What was the first example of a disqualified image from a photography competition?
-An image was disqualified from the World Press Photo competition because the photographer cloned out a tiny bit of a shoe or foot in the background.
Why was the National Geographic competition winning image disqualified?
-The original image had some litter - a plastic bag - in the right side of the frame. The photographer cloned it out, breaking the strict no manipulation rules.
What manipulation led to the disqualification of the dramatic elephant image?
-The photographer had tidied up the elephant's torn left ear, smoothing it off. Manipulating the content of images is prohibited.
What was the issue with the award-winning image of an Iberian wolf?
-It turned out that the wolf in the image was actually a trained, tame wolf that you can hire for filming/photography. So it wasn't a true wildlife shot.
How was the anteater image revealed to be fake?
-An anonymous source reported it, and experts confirmed it was the stuffed anteater that sits at the entrance to a National Park in Brazil.
What did the AI surfing image demonstrate?
-The photographer revealed it was AI to prove a point - that the competition needed more stringent image checking processes.
Why was the image with two mannequins assumed to be AI?
-The eerie look led judges to assume it was AI. But the photographer revealed it was just a phone shot, demonstrating issues with assumptions.
What is the biggest concern about AI raised in the video?
-That people will start assuming great images are AI generated rather than giving photographers credit. The onus may shift to proving images are not AI.
What were some common reasons images were disqualified?
-Manipulating content by cloning, using stuffed or trained animals, creating composite images, and generating images with AI.
What can we learn from these stories of photography competition disqualifications?
-Entrants need to carefully read competition rules and not manipulate images. Also that AI is creating new challenges for judging image authenticity.
Outlines
๐ฒ Disqualified images from photo competitions
The first paragraph introduces the topic of photographers manipulating images to win competitions and facing disqualification when caught. It mentions a recent newsletter covering this and intent to provide more examples. An image with minor cloning that was kicked out is shown - the rules are strict. A sponsor, Squarespace, is also introduced.
๐คจ More questionable disqualifications
The second paragraph continues by showing some additional images that were questionably disqualified in the author's opinion. The rules seem inconsistent and harsh. Squarespace is promoted again as a platform for easily building websites.
๐ก Serious manipulation and cheating
The third paragraph transitions to more serious and audacious manipulation by photographers to win competitions. Examples include a composite plane added to an image and a wildlife image using a trained pet presented as wild. There is strong condemnation for manipulating wildlife images in particular.
๐ฒ Stuffed animals and AI images causing issues
The fourth paragraph shows additional egregious examples involving wildlife images - one using a stuffed animal and another suspected to be AI generated. There is debate around the actual veracity of the images. The author reflects on how AI imagery will cause suspicion and challenges going forward.
Mindmap
Keywords
๐กphotography competition
๐กimage manipulation
๐กwildlife photography
๐กAI-generated images
๐กphotoshop
๐กcloning
๐กcropping
๐กcomposite image
๐กcaption
๐กraw file
Highlights
Photographer cloned out a tiny bit of a shoe or foot in an image to win a competition
Photographer cloned out some litter in an award-winning National Geographic image
An elephant image was disqualified when it was revealed the photographer tidied up the elephant's torn left ear
The photographer denies manipulating the elephant's ear and claims it was an accident
Further analysis shows the elephant's ears were actually swapped, not just cloned
A winning Nikon photo contest entry had an airplane cloned out, with a false caption about it flying overhead
Wildlife photography competitions have very strict rules about manipulating images
A winning wolf image was actually a trained tame wolf, not a wild wolf
Another wildlife competition had a winning anteater image that turned out to be a taxidermy anteater
Some AI-generated images have won and then been disqualified from photo contests when revealed
One photographer entered an AI image to make a point about verification processes
A real photo was assumed to be AI and kicked out of a contest
AI images may cause people to doubt all exceptional photography
Photographers may have to prove images are not AI generated
Links provided to read photographers' perspectives on disqualified images
Transcripts
Browse More Related Video
HOW TO MAKE WRINKLE ASSETS WITH AI
10 Photography Mistakes Beginners Make // Photo Pro
Amazing Bird Photography in the footsteps of BBC and Nat Geo - 2 weeks in Norway
The Camera Companies DO NOT Want you to Know This
Discover the Magic of Canva's New AI features | What's HOT in Canva๐ฅ [Ep. 27]
Andre Bazin's "Ontology of the Photographic Image"
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Thanks for rating: