How The Supreme Court Killed Roe v. Wade

LegalEagle

29 Jun 202227:12

EducationalLearning

32 Likes 10 Comments

TLDRThis script delves into the historical and legal evolution of abortion rights in the U.S., from the foundational Griswold v. Connecticut to the landmark Roe v. Wade and subsequent cases. It explains the concept of unenumerated rights and substantive due process, leading to the recent Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision that overturned the constitutional right to abortion. The summary also touches on the implications of the ruling and the potential future of reproductive rights.

Takeaways

📜 The script discusses the overturning of Roe v. Wade, signifying the end of the constitutional right to an abortion in the United States.
🔍 It delves into the history of the right to privacy, explaining how unenumerated rights, such as the right to an abortion, are derived from the Constitution's amendments.
📝 The Ninth Amendment is highlighted as a key component that ensures the existence of rights not explicitly listed in the Constitution.
🏛 The Supreme Court's role in defining unenumerated rights is underscored, with Griswold v. Connecticut being a pivotal case that set the precedent for privacy rights.
🚫 The Griswold case and its implications are contrasted with the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, which overturned the right to an abortion established in Roe v. Wade.
📈 The script outlines the legal evolution of abortion rights, from Griswold to Casey, and finally to the recent Dobbs decision, illustrating the shift in judicial interpretation.
🛑 The Casey decision's undue burden test is explained, showing how it replaced the trimester framework from Roe and set the standard for evaluating abortion restrictions.
🎯 The Dobbs decision's rationale is scrutinized, with a focus on the majority opinion's argument that the right to an abortion is not a deeply rooted historical right.
🏳️‍🌈 The script touches on the broader implications of the Dobbs decision for other unenumerated rights, such as same-sex marriage and interracial marriage.
⚖️ The dissenting opinions in the Dobbs case are summarized, critiquing the majority's approach and its potential impact on women's rights and equality.
💡 The script concludes with a call to action, suggesting ways the audience can support reproductive health organizations in the wake of the Dobbs decision.

Q & A

What is the historical basis for the constitutional right to privacy, including the right to an abortion in the United States?
-The right to privacy, including the right to an abortion, is based on the concept of unenumerated rights in the U.S. Constitution. The Ninth Amendment states that the enumeration of certain rights should not be construed to deny or disparage other rights retained by the people. The Supreme Court has interpreted this to include a general right to privacy for personal decisions on intimate matters.
How did the Griswold v. Connecticut case contribute to the establishment of a right to privacy?
-Griswold v. Connecticut voided a statute that made it illegal for married people to buy contraception. The Supreme Court found that privacy was a value implied by several amendments, including the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments, and that this implied right to privacy included the right to use contraception.
What was the legal reasoning behind the Supreme Court's decision in Roe v. Wade?
-In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court ruled that the 14th Amendment's concept of personal liberty includes a right to privacy that encompasses a woman's decision to terminate a pregnancy. The Court also recognized that the state had a valid interest in regulating pregnancy, which increased as the pregnancy progressed.
What changes did the Planned Parenthood v. Casey decision make to the legal framework for abortion established by Roe v. Wade?
-Planned Parenthood v. Casey replaced Roe's trimester framework with a viability analysis and lowered the standard of review for abortion restrictions from strict scrutiny to an undue burden test. It allowed states to impose certain restrictions on abortion as long as they did not create a substantial obstacle for a woman seeking an abortion of a non-viable fetus.
What was the significance of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization case in the context of abortion rights in the United States?
-Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization was significant because the Supreme Court overruled the precedents set by Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, allowing each state to decide whether there is a right to an abortion, effectively ending the federal constitutional right to an abortion.
What is the rationale behind the majority opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization for not considering abortion a fundamental right?
-The majority opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization argued that the right to an abortion is not deeply rooted in the nation's history and tradition, and thus does not meet the standard for unenumerated rights under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment. The Court held that the Due Process Clause protects certain liberties but does not guarantee the right to abortion.
What is the 'undue burden test' established by Planned Parenthood v. Casey, and how does it differ from the 'trimester rule' of Roe v. Wade?
-The 'undue burden test' from Planned Parenthood v. Casey evaluates whether abortion restrictions place a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a non-viable fetus. This differs from Roe v. Wade's 'trimester rule', which allowed for different levels of state regulation of abortion based on the stage of pregnancy.
How did the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. Virginia relate to the concept of privacy rights?
-In Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court held that a Virginia law criminalizing interracial marriage violated the due process clause of the 14th Amendment. The Court recognized that the freedom to marry, or not marry a person of another race, is a fundamental right that resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the state, thus expanding the concept of privacy rights.
What is the 'rational basis review' standard mentioned in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision?
-The 'rational basis review' is the most lenient standard of judicial review, where a law is upheld as long as there is a rational basis that the legislature could have thought would serve a legitimate state interest. In the Dobbs decision, the Court applied this standard to uphold Mississippi's abortion restriction law.
What are the implications of the dissenting opinions in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization case for future legal challenges?
-The dissenting opinions in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization critique the majority's reasoning and express concern for the erosion of privacy rights and women's equality. While they do not carry the force of law, they indicate potential directions for future legal challenges and arguments against the decision.
How does the concept of 'stare decisis' play a role in the legal debate surrounding the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization case?
-Stare decisis is the legal principle that courts should follow precedent unless there is a compelling reason not to. In the Dobbs case, the majority opinion argued that stare decisis did not apply because the original Roe decision was 'egregiously wrong', while dissenting justices argued that the majority had not provided a special justification for overruling the precedent.

Outlines

00:00

📜 Historical Context of Abortion Rights in the U.S.

This paragraph delves into the origins of the constitutional right to an abortion in the United States, tracing it back to the concept of privacy rights, which are considered unenumerated rights in the Constitution. It explains the Ninth Amendment's role in protecting these unenumerated rights and how the Supreme Court, starting from the mid-20th century, began to interpret these rights more expansively. The Griswold v. Connecticut case is highlighted as a pivotal moment in establishing a right to privacy, which subsequently influenced the landmark Roe v. Wade decision in 1973, recognizing a woman's right to abortion under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment.

05:01

🏛️ Shift in Abortion Jurisprudence: From Roe to Casey

The second paragraph outlines the evolution of abortion rights in the U.S. following the Roe v. Wade decision. It discusses the Planned Parenthood v. Casey ruling, which replaced the trimester framework with a viability analysis and introduced the undue burden test for evaluating abortion restrictions. The paragraph also touches on how states have utilized this new standard to enact various restrictions on abortion, leading to a complex legal landscape that has been shaped by numerous court decisions over the years.

10:03

🛑 Overturning Roe: The Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Case

This paragraph details the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which challenged Mississippi's Gestational Age Act restricting abortions after 15 weeks of gestation. The paragraph explains how the Supreme Court's decision in this case marked a radical departure from previous rulings, with a majority opinion by Justice Alito arguing that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion and that the matter should be left to state legislatures. The paragraph also covers the implications of this decision for the right to privacy and the substantive due process doctrine.

15:04

🔄 The Roberts Concurrency: A Middle Ground on Abortion Rights?

The fourth paragraph examines Chief Justice Roberts' concurring opinion in the Dobbs case, where he proposed upholding the Mississippi law without overturning Roe and Casey. Roberts suggested that the viability standard should be replaced but the right to an abortion should be maintained. His approach aimed to balance the interests of the woman and the state, advocating for judicial restraint and a more measured approach to the constitutionality of abortion restrictions.

20:04

🚫 The Kavanaugh and Thomas Concurring Opinions: Charting Future Legal Battles

This paragraph presents the concurring opinions of Justices Kavanaugh and Thomas in the Dobbs case. Kavanaugh emphasized the Court's neutrality on abortion and the importance of leaving the decision to the states, while also addressing potential future legal issues such as cross-state travel for abortions and retroactive punishment. Thomas, on the other hand, called for a reevaluation of all substantive due process precedents, including landmark cases like Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell, indicating a broader challenge to unenumerated rights.

25:06

📖 The Dissent: A Defense of Women's Rights and Precedent

The final paragraph focuses on the dissenting opinions of Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, who criticized the majority's decision to overturn Roe and Casey. They argued that the majority's ruling disregarded women's rights to equality and freedom, and that the decision was not based on legal or factual changes but rather on personal beliefs of the justices. The dissent also accused the majority of selectively using history to justify their decision and warned of the broader implications for other fundamental rights.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Roe v. Wade

Roe v. Wade is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that established a woman's legal right to have an abortion under the constitutional right to privacy. The video script discusses the overturning of this decision, which has significant implications for women's reproductive rights in the United States. It is central to the video's theme as it sets the historical context for the discussion on abortion rights.

💡Constitutional right to privacy

The constitutional right to privacy refers to the general right of individuals to make personal decisions regarding intimate matters without government interference. In the script, this concept is foundational to the discussion of abortion rights, as it underpins the argument that women have a constitutionally protected right to make decisions about their own bodies, including whether to terminate a pregnancy.

💡Unenumerated rights

Unenumerated rights are rights not specifically listed in the U.S. Constitution but are inferred to exist based on other constitutional provisions. The script explains that the right to an abortion was considered an unenumerated right, derived from the general right to privacy, which is itself not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. This concept is key to understanding the legal reasoning behind the establishment and subsequent challenges to abortion rights.

💡Ninth Amendment

The Ninth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that the enumeration of certain rights in the Constitution does not deny or disparage other rights retained by the people. The script cites this amendment as a basis for the Supreme Court's interpretation of unenumerated rights, including the right to privacy and, by extension, the right to an abortion.

💡Substantive due process

Substantive due process is a legal concept that allows courts to protect certain fundamental rights from government interference, even if those rights are not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. The script discusses how the Supreme Court used this concept to establish a constitutional right to abortion, interpreting the 14th Amendment's due process clause to include a right to personal privacy.

💡Griswold v. Connecticut

Griswold v. Connecticut is a Supreme Court case that invalidated a law prohibiting the use of contraception by married couples. The script refers to this case as it established the right to privacy in marital relationships, which set a precedent for the recognition of unenumerated rights, including the right to an abortion.

💡Eisenstadt v. Baird

Eisenstadt v. Baird is another Supreme Court case mentioned in the script that extended the right to privacy, and specifically the right to use contraception, to unmarried individuals. This case is relevant as it further expanded the interpretation of privacy rights, which contributed to the legal foundation for Roe v. Wade.

💡Loving v. Virginia

Loving v. Virginia is a Supreme Court decision that invalidated state laws prohibiting interracial marriage. The script uses this case as an example of how the Court has used the 14th Amendment's due process clause to strike down laws that infringe upon individual liberties, including the right to marry a person of another race, which parallels the right to an abortion in terms of personal liberty.

💡Planned Parenthood v. Casey

Planned Parenthood v. Casey is a Supreme Court case that revised the legal standards established in Roe v. Wade, introducing the 'undue burden' test for evaluating abortion restrictions. The script discusses this case as it represents a significant shift in the Court's approach to abortion rights, moving away from the trimester framework to a viability-based analysis.

💡Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization is the case that led to the overturning of Roe v. Wade. The script details this case as it presents the legal challenge to Mississippi's Gestational Age Act and the subsequent Supreme Court decision that effectively ended the constitutional right to an abortion, allowing states to regulate or ban the procedure.

💡Stare decisis

Stare decisis is the legal principle that courts should adhere to precedents established in prior decisions. The script discusses the Court's consideration of this principle in the context of the Dobbs case, where the majority ultimately decided that the precedents set by Roe and Casey were 'egregiously wrong' and therefore did not deserve to be maintained.

Highlights

Roe v. Wade and its progeny are declared no longer valid, eliminating the constitutional right to an abortion in the United States.

The constitutional right to an abortion was rooted in a general right to privacy for personal decisions on intimate matters.

Unenumerated rights, including privacy, are inferred from the Constitution despite not being explicitly listed.

The Ninth Amendment prevents the government from denying unenumerated rights to the people.

Griswold v. Connecticut established the right to privacy by interpreting the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments.

The Supreme Court has identified and upheld rights not explicitly enumerated in the Constitution, such as the right to privacy.

Laws prohibiting interracial marriage were struck down based on the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause.

Roe v. Wade established the constitutional right to an abortion through the Fifth Amendment's due process clause.

Roe's ruling was based on the concept that the word 'person' in the Constitution does not include the unborn.

Planned Parenthood v. Casey revised Roe by introducing a viability analysis and an undue burden test for abortion restrictions.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization led to the overruling of Roe and Casey, allowing states to decide on abortion rights.

Justice Alito's majority opinion argues that the right to abortion is not deeply rooted in the nation's history and tradition.

Chief Justice Roberts' concurring opinion suggests upholding the Mississippi law without overturning Roe and Casey.

Justice Thomas' concurrence calls for reconsidering all substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell.

The dissent argues that the majority's decision erases women's interests and replaces the rule of law with a rule by judges.

The dissent criticizes the majority for its reliance on historical analysis that does not consider the evolving nature of rights.

The video discusses the implications of the Dobbs decision and potential future actions in response to the ruling.

The transcript concludes with a call to action, encouraging viewers to support reproductive health organizations through Tab for a Cause.

Transcripts

Browse More Related Video

The End of Roe v. Wade -- and What Comes Next | Kathryn Kolbert | TED

Abortion rights around the world - Global News Podcast, BBC World Service

Roe v. Wade: A Legal History

Abortion Ruling: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)

The race to teach abortion procedures | FOX 13 Seattle

Abortion By The Numbers | Forbes

Related Tags

Abortion Rights Roe v. Wade Constitutional Law Privacy Rights Due Process Substantive Due Process Casey Decision Dobbs v. Jackson Stare Decisis Women's Equality Legal Analysis