Roe v. Wade: A Legal History

The Federalist Society

22 Jan 202121:12

EducationalLearning

32 Likes 10 Comments

TLDRThe script delves into the landmark Supreme Court decision of Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion in the U.S. It discusses the controversial nature of the case, the historical context, and the legal reasoning behind the ruling. Highlighting the right to privacy as the foundation, the script examines the trimester framework established by the Court and the ongoing debate it sparked, framing abortion as a fundamental right and a deeply divisive political issue.

Takeaways

🏛️ Roe v. Wade is recognized as a landmark Supreme Court case that legalized abortion across the United States.
🔍 The right to abortion was established as a fundamental right, equating it with other basic rights such as the right to marry and procreate.
👥 The Supreme Court's decision was split seven to two, with Justices Byron White and William Rehnquist dissenting.
📅 January 22nd, 1973 marked the historic day when the Supreme Court made its ruling on Roe v. Wade.
🌟 The decision was unprecedented, with no prior suggestion from the Supreme Court that abortion restrictions were constitutionally suspect.
🤰 The case involved 'Jane Roe,' a woman seeking an abortion in Texas, which had one of the strictest anti-abortion laws at the time.
📖 There was a lack of an evidentiary record in the case, with the trial court disposing of it on summary judgment and only a limited number of affidavits.
📈 The Supreme Court heard the case twice, reflecting the complexity and the evolving nature of the constitutional questions involved.
🔑 The right to privacy, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, is the foundation of modern jurisprudence on abortion.
🛡️ Substantive due process, underpinned by the Fourteenth Amendment, was invoked to protect rights that are considered fundamental and cannot be arbitrarily taken away.
🚫 The state of Texas argued that there was no constitutional basis for a right to abortion and that states had historically regulated it through common law and statutes.

Q & A

What is the significance of Roe v. Wade in the context of the U.S. Supreme Court decisions?
-Roe v. Wade is significant as it is one of the most controversial and well-known Supreme Court decisions that legalized abortion and established it as a fundamental right, comparable to other rights such as the right to marry or procreate.
What was the original question the Supreme Court accepted for Roe v. Wade?
-The original question the Supreme Court accepted was whether an individual could access federal courts to make a federal constitutional claim while being subjected to criminal prosecution, specifically for doctors accused of performing illegal abortions.
Why was Roe v. Wade argued twice before the Supreme Court?
-Roe v. Wade was argued twice because two justices retired between the time the case was accepted and the first argument, leading the Court to decide that it should be argued before a full bench, resulting in a second argument in 1972.
What was the composition of the Supreme Court when Roe v. Wade was decided?
-The Supreme Court was split seven to two in favor of legalizing abortion, with Justices Byron White and William Rehnquist dissenting.
Why was the case named Roe v. Wade?
-The case was named Roe v. Wade after the pseudonym 'Jane Roe' used by the plaintiff, Norma McCorvey, who was seeking to challenge the strict anti-abortion laws in Texas, and Henry Wade, the District Attorney of Dallas County.
How did the Supreme Court justify the right to abortion in Roe v. Wade?
-The Supreme Court justified the right to abortion by invoking the right to privacy, which they argued includes a woman's decision whether or not to continue a pregnancy, and is protected under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
What is the 'trimester framework' established by the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade?
-The trimester framework allows for no state regulation on abortion in the first trimester, regulations directed at protecting the mother's health in the second trimester, and states can ban abortion in the third trimester except to protect the life and health of the mother, with a broad definition of health.
How did the Court address the state's interest in potential life in Roe v. Wade?
-The Court acknowledged the state's interest in potential life but determined that this interest does not outweigh the woman's choice until the fetus is viable outside the womb.
What was the impact of the Griswold v. Connecticut case on the development of the right to privacy and Roe v. Wade?
-Griswold v. Connecticut established a fundamental right to privacy for married couples to use contraception, which laid the groundwork for the broader right to privacy that was later extended to include a woman's decision to have an abortion in Roe v. Wade.
What was the medical community's stance during the time leading up to Roe v. Wade, and how did it influence the decision?
-The medical community, particularly the American Medical Association, had been involved in criminalizing abortion in the 19th century and advocated for the removal of criminal abortion laws. This perspective influenced the Court's decision, as it focused on the doctor-patient relationship and the rights of doctors to practice medicine without criminal prosecution.
How did the Roe v. Wade decision affect the political landscape in the United States?
-The decision galvanized both pro-choice and pro-life movements, making abortion a deeply divisive political issue. It also led to a perception among some that the Supreme Court had overstepped its authority, using 'raw judicial power' to impose a policy without a clear constitutional basis.

Outlines

00:00

🏛️ Landmark Ruling on Abortion Rights

The paragraph discusses the historic and controversial nature of the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision, which legalized abortion and established it as a fundamental right. It highlights the case's significance in American legal history, the surprise element of the ruling, and the lack of historical or constitutional support for the decision. The paragraph also touches on the personal circumstances of 'Jane Roe,' Norma McCorvey, and the legal journey of the case, including its expedited path to the Supreme Court and the narrow question it initially aimed to address.

05:02

📜 The Evolution of Abortion Rights Discourse

This paragraph delves into the transformation of the abortion rights debate from a narrow procedural question to a broader constitutional issue. It outlines the historical context of privacy rights as established in previous Supreme Court cases like Griswold v. Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. Baird, which laid the groundwork for the right to privacy and its application to abortion. The summary explains how the concept of substantive due process and the right to privacy were invoked to support the constitutionality of abortion rights.

10:04

🤔 The Controversy and Legal Strategy in Roe v. Wade

The paragraph examines the arguments made in favor of and against the constitutional right to abortion, focusing on the private nature of the decision and the state's interest in potential life. It discusses the Texas state's response to the case, emphasizing their historical and legal basis for regulating abortion. The summary also touches on the surprising nature of the Court's decision, given the historical context and the fact that the case was assigned to a relatively inexperienced lawyer.

15:06

🛡️ The Legal Framework of Roe v. Wade

This paragraph outlines the legal framework established by the Roe v. Wade decision, including the trimester framework for evaluating the state's interest in regulating abortion. It discusses the implications of the ruling for doctors and women's rights, the state's interest in potential life, and the balancing of these interests. The summary highlights the broad interpretation of the right to privacy and the impact of the decision on the medical profession and women's autonomy.

20:06

🔍 Reflections on Roe v. Wade's Impact and Legacy

The final paragraph reflects on the long-term impact and legacy of Roe v. Wade, considering its role in shaping the ongoing debate on abortion rights. It discusses the Court's imposition of a particular policy and the subsequent divisive political and social effects. The summary also considers the dissenting opinions and the view that the decision represented an overreach of judicial power, setting the stage for a lasting and contentious national conversation.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Roe versus Wade

Roe versus Wade refers to the landmark 1973 U.S. Supreme Court case that established a woman's legal right to have an abortion. The case is central to the video's theme as it explores the historical context, legal reasoning, and the impact of this decision on American society. The video mentions it as 'one of the most controversial decisions' and discusses the Court's ruling that made abortion largely a private matter.

💡Fundamental right

A fundamental right, in the context of the video, refers to a basic liberty that is protected by the Constitution and cannot be infringed upon without due process. The script explains how the Supreme Court articulated the right to abortion as a fundamental right, equating it with other basic rights such as the right to marry and procreate, thus placing it at the core of the video's discussion on individual liberties and state regulations.

💡Substantive due process

Substantive due process is a legal doctrine that some rights are so important that they cannot be taken away arbitrarily by the legislature. The video emphasizes this concept as the underlying principle that gives rise to the right to privacy, which includes the right to abortion. The script describes how the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause is interpreted to include these fundamental rights.

💡Right to privacy

The right to privacy is a constitutional right that protects personal, intimate decisions from government interference. The video discusses how this right was invoked in the Roe v. Wade decision to support the constitutionality of a woman's decision to have an abortion. The script notes the controversial nature of this right, as it is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but has been inferred through cases like Griswold v. Connecticut.

💡Trimester framework

The trimester framework is a legal concept introduced in the Roe v. Wade decision that divides pregnancy into three periods, each with different levels of state regulation regarding abortion. The video explains how this framework allows for no regulation in the first trimester, regulations to protect the mother's health in the second, and potential bans in the third trimester except to protect life and health, illustrating the Court's attempt to balance a woman's rights with state interests.

💡Viability

Viability, in the context of the video, refers to the point in a pregnancy when the fetus can potentially survive outside the womb. The script mentions that the Supreme Court did not recognize fetal personhood until the fetus would be viable, indicating that the state's interest in the potential life of the fetus becomes significant enough to potentially limit a woman's right to abortion at this stage.

💡Precedent

Precedent is a legal principle or rule established in a previous legal case that is either binding or persuasive in a court's decision. The video discusses how the Roe v. Wade decision was anchored in previous cases, particularly the Griswold v. Connecticut case that established the right to use contraception, showing how the Court built upon existing legal principles to shape its ruling on abortion.

💡Strict scrutiny

Strict scrutiny is the highest level of judicial review used in the United States to determine the constitutionality of laws and government actions. The video explains that the Court's recognition of abortion as a fundamental right subjected any state regulation to this rigorous standard, requiring the state to demonstrate a compelling interest and that the regulation is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest.

💡Judicial activism

Judicial activism refers to the practice of judges making decisions based on their personal views or ideology, rather than strictly interpreting the law or Constitution. The video script mentions the dissenting opinion of Justice White, who criticized Roe v. Wade as an act of 'raw judicial power,' suggesting that the decision was an example of the Court overstepping its role and imposing a policy without a clear constitutional basis.

💡Federalism

Federalism is the division of power between a central government and constituent entities, such as states. The video touches on the concept of federalism when discussing the state of Texas's argument that the Fourteenth Amendment should protect against the prohibition of abortion, highlighting the tension between state and federal authority in regulating matters like abortion.

💡Personhood

Personhood, in the context of the video, refers to the legal recognition of certain rights and protections to an entity, such as a fetus. The script notes the absence of a concept of fetal personhood in the law, which influenced the Court's decision in Roe v. Wade, as it determined that the state's interest in potential life does not override a woman's choice until the fetus is viable.

Highlights

Roe versus Wade is one of the most controversial Supreme Court decisions, known as a symbol and cited by name by most Americans.

The Supreme Court legalized abortion, considering it a fundamental right on par with other rights such as marriage and procreation.

The Court's decision was split seven to two, with Justices Byron White and William Rehnquist dissenting.

Roe versus Wade was unprecedented, with no historical, textual, or precedential support in the Constitution for the decision.

Jane Roe, a pseudonym for Norma McCorvey, was a woman in Texas seeking an abortion under restrictive laws.

The case was based on limited affidavits with no evidentiary record, disposed of on summary judgment.

The Texas federal court struck down the Texas law, prompting an immediate appeal to the Supreme Court.

Roe was argued twice before the Supreme Court due to changes in the Court's composition.

The Court's decision was based on a narrow procedural question that evolved into a broader constitutional right to abortion.

The right to privacy, as established in Griswold versus Connecticut, was the foundation for the modern jurisprudence on abortion.

The Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause was key in establishing the right to privacy and substantive due process.

Justice Blackmun's opinion in Roe focused on history and medicine, avoiding the state's interest in children's lives.

The trimester framework was introduced to balance the state's interest in potential life with a woman's right to choose.

Roe created a legal floor preventing the complete outlawing of abortion services, despite significant regulation.

The state's interest in unborn life does not outweigh a woman's choice until the fetus is viable outside the womb.

Roe versus Wade has been a deep wound in the body politic, galvanizing the anti-abortion movement and affecting democratic processes.

The Court's decision in Roe was seen by some as an act of raw judicial power, lacking textual basis and overturning all 50 states' laws.

Transcripts

Browse More Related Video

How The Supreme Court Killed Roe v. Wade

Abortion By The Numbers | Forbes

Abortion rights around the world - Global News Podcast, BBC World Service

The End of Roe v. Wade -- and What Comes Next | Kathryn Kolbert | TED

The race to teach abortion procedures | FOX 13 Seattle

4 ways Americans are still getting abortion pills

Related Tags

Roe v. Wade Abortion Rights Supreme Court Legal History Fundamental Rights Privacy Rights Constitutional Law Medical Ethics Social Controversy Legal Debate Women's Rights