How Can You Tell When Someone is Lying? | Norah Dunbar | TEDxLagunaBlancaSchool

TEDx Talks
9 Mar 202209:28
EducationalLearning
32 Likes 10 Comments

TLDRIn a compelling discourse, deception detection researcher David DeRuwe debunks common myths about lie detection, such as liars looking up to the left or displaying easily discernible facial cues. He emphasizes that humans are poor lie detectors, often relying on biases and flawed cues. DeRuwe outlines three key aspects of deception: humans' inaccuracy in lie detection, the absence of a single tell for deception, and the subtlety of deceptive behavior. He suggests looking for clusters of cues, including uncertainty, tension, and cognitive load, which manifest in both verbal and non-verbal behaviors. DeRuwe also advocates for the use of computer algorithms to aid in detecting deception more accurately by processing multiple cues simultaneously, which humans cannot do effectively. His talk encourages a more nuanced understanding of deception and the potential of technology in enhancing our ability to detect it.

Takeaways
  • πŸ“’ The story of Brian Williams, a celebrated news anchor, illustrates the severe consequences of deception in professional settings, leading to job loss and a tarnished reputation.
  • πŸ€” Deception by admired figures, such as politicians, journalists, or athletes, can lead to increased cynicism, while lies from loved ones can deeply hurt and damage trust.
  • 🧐 Contrary to popular myths, there are no definitive physical signs like looking up to the left for liars or up to the right for truth-tellers that can accurately indicate lying.
  • 🚫 Humans are poor lie detectors, often being wrong half the time due to biases and reliance on incorrect cues.
  • πŸ‘€ The myth that the eyes are the 'windows to the soul' is debunked; liars can lie while maintaining eye contact.
  • 🚫 There is no single physical cue, like blinking or pupil dilation, that is a reliable indicator of deception.
  • πŸ” To detect deception accurately, one should look for clusters of cues, including verbal and non-verbal signals, rather than focusing on a single behavior.
  • 🀨 Uncertainty can be a sign of deception, as liars often lack detail and plausibility in their stories and show less engagement in their gestures and language.
  • πŸ˜“ Tension is another cluster to observe, as liars may display increased vigilance, leading to behaviors like pursed lips, less facial animation, and unnatural gestures.
  • 🧠 Cognitive load is indicated when a person's brain is working hard to maintain a lie, which can result in inconsistencies, short answers, repetition, and longer pauses.
  • πŸ’» Computer algorithms can assist in detecting deception more accurately by analyzing multiple cues simultaneously, which is beyond human processing capabilities.
  • πŸ€– The use of technology for deception detection is not about replacing human judgment but enhancing it with objective, less biased analysis.
Q & A
  • What was the issue with Brian Williams' story about a helicopter crash in Iraq?

    -The issue was that the story Brian Williams told about a helicopter crash in Iraq was not entirely true. This deception led to his termination from the network and loss of his nightly news anchor job, although he was later reinstated.

  • Why does deception by people we admire hurt more than others?

    -Deception by people we admire hurts more because it ruins our relationships and makes us less trusting in the future. It stings because we have a higher expectation of honesty from those we respect and trust.

  • What is a common myth about detecting lies that the speaker refutes?

    -A common myth that the speaker refutes is that liars look up to the left and truth tellers look up to the right. The speaker clarifies that this is not true and is one of the many myths perpetuated by media.

  • How often are humans wrong when trying to judge between truths and lies?

    -Humans are wrong about half the time when trying to judge between truths and lies due to biases and the influence of personal experiences and history.

  • What is the speaker's main argument against relying on single cues to detect deception?

    -The speaker argues against relying on single cues to detect deception because there is no one tell that works for everyone. Deception detection requires looking for clusters of cues and patterns of behavior.

  • What are the three clusters of cues the speaker suggests looking for to detect deception?

    -The three clusters of cues the speaker suggests are uncertainty, tension, and cognitive load. These clusters involve a combination of verbal and non-verbal cues that can indicate deception.

  • How does the speaker describe the nature of deception?

    -The speaker describes deception as subtle and beneath the surface. It involves small differences between truth and lies, often with lies being embedded with truths, making it difficult to detect.

  • What is the role of computer algorithms in detecting deception according to the speaker?

    -Computer algorithms can assist in detecting deception more accurately by analyzing multiple verbal and non-verbal cues simultaneously, which humans cannot do as effectively. They can be less biased and more objective.

  • Why does the speaker suggest that relying solely on human judgment is flawed in deception detection?

    -The speaker suggests that relying solely on human judgment is flawed because humans are prone to biases, lack consistent feedback on their decisions, and often look for the wrong cues, leading to inaccurate deception detection.

  • What are some of the tools used in the speaker's lab to detect deception?

    -In the speaker's lab, they use facial tracking, gesture tracking, pupillometry, and even thermal imaging to analyze a wide range of non-verbal and verbal cues to detect deception.

  • How does the speaker alleviate concerns about the use of computer algorithms in deception detection?

    -The speaker alleviates concerns by clarifying that the use of computer algorithms is not about replacing human decision-making with AI but rather using technology to assist in detecting deception more accurately, reducing bias, and improving objectivity.

  • What is the speaker's hope for the audience after the talk?

    -The speaker hopes that the audience will learn to think about deception differently and gain some methods to detect deception more accurately in the future.

Outlines
00:00
πŸ“’ Myths and Realities of Deception Detection

The first paragraph discusses the story of Brian Williams, a news anchor whose false story about a helicopter crash in Iraq led to his termination and tarnished reputation. It highlights the emotional impact of deception from those we admire and trust. The speaker, a deception detection researcher, dispels common myths about detecting lies, such as liars looking up to the left or displaying certain facial expressions. The paragraph emphasizes the need to move beyond these myths to accurately detect deception and improve our lives. It introduces three key facts about deception: humans are poor lie detectors, there is no single cue for deception, and deception is subtle. The speaker suggests looking for clusters of cues, including uncertainty, tension, and cognitive load, to detect deception more accurately.

05:03
πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™‚οΈ Detecting Deception: Uncertainty, Tension, and Cognitive Load

The second paragraph delves into the three clusters of cues that can help detect deception: uncertainty, tension, and cognitive load. Uncertainty is identified by a lack of detail, implausible stories, and less animated body language when individuals are lying. Tension is exhibited by liars who are vigilant, watching the listener's reactions, and adapting their story, which can manifest in increased voice pitch, pursed lips, and less natural gestures. Cognitive load occurs when the brain works overtime to maintain a lie, leading to inconsistencies, short answers, repetition, and longer pauses. The speaker advises not to rely solely on one cue but to consider a combination of verbal and non-verbal cues. Additionally, the paragraph suggests that computer algorithms can assist in detecting deception by analyzing multiple cues simultaneously, which is more objective and less biased than human judgment.

Mindmap
Keywords
πŸ’‘Deception
Deception refers to the act of misleading or being dishonest with others, often through lies or half-truths. In the video, deception is the central theme, as it explores how people lie and the impact of such dishonesty on relationships and trust. The video discusses deception in the context of a news anchor's false story and the broader implications of lying in society.
πŸ’‘Lie Detection
Lie detection involves the identification of deception through various cues and behaviors. The video emphasizes that humans are poor lie detectors, often relying on incorrect myths and cues such as eye movement. It suggests looking for clusters of cues, including uncertainty, tension, and cognitive load, to more accurately detect deception.
πŸ’‘Biases
Biases are preconceived opinions or inclinations that can influence judgment. In the context of the video, biases are mentioned as one of the reasons why humans are not effective at detecting lies, as they can cloud our perception and lead us to rely on myths rather than accurate indicators of deception.
πŸ’‘Uncertainty
Uncertainty, in the video, is described as a cluster of cues that may indicate deception. When someone is lying, they may exhibit signs of uncertainty, such as a lack of detail in their story, implausible scenarios, and less animated body language. This concept is used to illustrate how liars often struggle to construct a believable narrative.
πŸ’‘Tension
Tension is a state of strain or stress, and in the video, it is identified as another cluster of cues that can suggest deception. Liars may appear tense because they are vigilantly monitoring the listener's reactions and adapting their story to maintain credibility. Examples in the script include increased pitch of voice and less facial animation.
πŸ’‘Cognitive Load
Cognitive load refers to the mental effort involved when the brain is working hard to process information. The video explains that liars experience cognitive load as they try to maintain a consistent story, monitor the listener, and avoid inconsistencies. This can manifest in the form of short answers, repetition, and longer pauses while speaking.
πŸ’‘Myths
Myths are popular beliefs or stories that are not true but are widely circulated. The video dispels several myths about lying, such as the idea that liars look up to the left or that certain facial tics are definitive signs of deception. These myths are debunked to help viewers understand that detecting deception is more complex and requires a more nuanced approach.
πŸ’‘Pinocchio's Nose
Pinocchio's nose is a metaphor used in the video to represent the nonexistent single cue that could always indicate deception. The video clarifies that there is no one-size-fits-all sign for detecting lies, contrary to what some might believe or what is often depicted in popular culture.
πŸ’‘Clusters of Cues
Clusters of cues are groups of verbal and non-verbal signals that, when considered together, may suggest deception. The video emphasizes the importance of looking for patterns of behavior rather than focusing on a single cue. This approach is more reliable for detecting deception as it takes into account multiple aspects of a person's communication.
πŸ’‘Computer Algorithms
Computer algorithms are sets of rules or processes that are followed to solve a problem or perform a task. In the context of the video, algorithms are proposed as a tool to aid in lie detection by analyzing multiple cues simultaneously, something humans cannot efficiently do. The video suggests that using technology can lead to more objective and less biased lie detection.
πŸ’‘Non-verbal Cues
Non-verbal cues are aspects of communication that do not involve words, such as facial expressions, body language, and gestures. The video discusses the importance of considering non-verbal cues in addition to verbal cues when attempting to detect deception. It highlights that a comprehensive assessment of a person's behavior is necessary to identify potential deception.
Highlights

Brian Williams was fired from his job as a news anchor for lying about a helicopter crash in Iraq.

Deception hurts because it ruins relationships and makes us less trusting.

Common myths about lying, like looking up to the left, are not true.

Humans are poor lie detectors, being wrong about half the time.

We are biased and look for the wrong cues when trying to detect lies.

There is no single cue like Pinocchio's nose that always indicates deception.

Deception is subtle and lies are often embedded with some truth.

Instead of one cue, look for clusters of verbal and nonverbal cues.

Liars often show uncertainty - less detail, implausible story, less animation.

Tension in a liar's voice, face and body language can be a sign of deception.

Cognitive load causes liars to give short, repetitive answers and pause more.

Computer algorithms can help detect deception more accurately by analyzing many cues.

Using technology like facial and gesture tracking can provide objective data.

AI should assist, not replace, human judgment in detecting deception.

Dispelling common myths and using a scientific approach can improve lie detection.

Detecting deception is difficult but possible with the right methods and tools.

This talk provides practical advice for thinking about and detecting deception more accurately.

Transcripts
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Thanks for rating: