Nitica Sakharwade - Possible futures: How to construct quantum space-time with indefiniteness
TLDRThe speaker delves into the concept of indefinite causal structures in quantum gravity, referencing Alison Hardy's 2006 paper. They introduce the 'Causaloid' framework, which blends quantum theory's probabilistic nature with general relativity's non-fixed causal structure. The talk presents a toy model to explore locally definite but globally indefinite causality, using local labs, operational choices, and a coloring law to avoid closed timelike curves. The model aims to provide insights into quantum space-time and the nature of indefiniteness in quantum networks.
Takeaways
- 🧠 The speaker discusses the challenge of integrating quantum gravity with the concept of indefinite causal structures, which is likened to climbing a difficult mountain.
- 🔍 Alison Hardy's 2006 paper is highlighted, proposing a framework for probabilistic theories with non-fixed causal structures, aiming to combine general relativity and quantum theory.
- 📚 The talk introduces the concept of 'operationalism' as a methodological approach to understanding what experiments can be conducted and the outcomes observed.
- 📏 The paper simplifies the discussion by focusing on finite dimensions, which is a departure from some other topics at the conference but is crucial for precision in measurement discussions.
- 🔄 Joy Malkowski isomorphism is mentioned as a mathematical tool that allows for a unified framework to discuss states and channels in quantum mechanics without predefining them.
- 🌐 The 'Causaloid' framework is introduced as a theoretical model for quantum networks, also known as quantum combs, which is a significant development in the field of quantum correlations without a causal order.
- 🎯 The speaker's aim is to create a toy model that can provide insights into the interpretation and ontology of indefinite causal structures and serve as a simple playground for observing quantum phenomena.
- 🔄 The 'Mighty Theory' presented models a locally definite but globally indefinite causal structure, using local labs and joining rules, without relying on higher-order objects.
- 🌌 The model operates in 1+1 dimensions and incorporates elements of space-time, with local labs perceiving flat space-time and communicating via photons, adding a layer of complexity to the causal structure.
- 🚫 The model avoids closed timelike curves, which could lead to inconsistencies in probability distribution normalization, by using a 'coloring law' that ensures stable causality.
- 🔮 The speaker concludes by discussing the limitations of the model, such as not providing analogs for all dynamic causal structure relations found in relativity, and suggests future directions including generalization to higher dimensions.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the speaker's talk?
-The main topic of the speaker's talk is the exploration of indefinite causal structures in the context of quantum gravity, drawing from the field of quantum theory and general relativity.
What is the significance of Alison Hardy's 2006 paper in this discussion?
-Alison Hardy's 2006 paper is significant because it introduces a framework for probabilistic theories with non-fixed causal structures, aiming to combine the deterministic nature of general relativity with the probabilistic nature of quantum theory.
What is operationalism in the context of this talk?
-In this talk, operationalism refers to a methodological approach focusing on what experiments can be conducted and the outcomes observed, rather than a philosophical stance on the nature of reality.
Why is finite dimensions considered an important 'foothold' in the field of indefinite causal structures?
-Finite dimensions are considered important because they simplify the structure of the theories and allow for a focus on the precision of measurement, which is relevant when discussing operationalism and the control of experimental outcomes.
What is the role of the Choi-Jamiołkowski isomorphism in this context?
-The Choi-Jamiołkowski isomorphism serves as a mathematical tool that allows for a unified framework to discuss states and channels in quantum mechanics without predefining whether it's a state or a channel.
What is the 'Casablanca' framework mentioned in the talk?
-The 'Casablanca' framework is a theoretical approach for quantum networks, also referred to as quantum combs, which has been developed since the paper mentioned and is focused on quantum correlations with no causal order.
What is the purpose of building a toy model in the context of indefinite causal structures?
-The purpose of building a toy model is to provide insights into the field, offering a simplified playground to observe phenomena such as superposition, entanglement, and teleportation, and to explore the interpretation or ontology of the field.
What does the speaker mean by 'quantum space-time interpretation for indefiniteness'?
-The speaker is referring to a desire to understand how the concept of indefiniteness in causal structures can be incorporated into a quantum framework, providing a more ontological perspective on how indefiniteness arises in the context of space-time.
What is the basic structure of the toy theory presented in the talk?
-The basic structure of the toy theory consists of local laboratory rings that are closed and have one input and one output, with the addition of space-time elements where each lab perceives a locally flat space-time and communicates using photons.
How does the speaker's toy theory address the issue of closed timelike curves?
-The toy theory addresses the issue of closed timelike curves by using a coloring law that, when applied, prevents the formation of such curves, thus avoiding inconsistencies with local specifications and maintaining stable causality.
What are the future directions mentioned by the speaker for the indefinite causal structure theory?
-The future directions mentioned include generalizing the theory to higher dimensions, exploring the implications for entanglement and multiple parties, and investigating how to recover global symmetries and transformations.
Outlines
🌌 Introduction to Quantum Gravity and Indefinite Causal Structures
The speaker begins by expressing gratitude to the organizers and introduces the topic of quantum gravity, which is likened to a formidable mountain to climb. The focus shifts to the field of indefinite causal structures, referencing a 2006 paper by Alison Hardy that discusses the integration of general relativity's deterministic yet non-fixed causal structure with quantum theory's probabilistic but fixed causal structure. The speaker aims to build a framework for probabilistic theories with non-fixed causal structures, using concepts such as operationalism, finite dimensions, and the Choi-Jamiołkowski isomorphism. The talk outlines the development of the 'Causaloid' framework and other theoretical advancements in quantum networks and process matrices.
🧩 Building Toy Models for Indefinite Causal Structures
The speaker proceeds to discuss the utility of toy models in understanding quantum foundations, citing the famous model by Robert B. Griffiths. The goal is to construct a toy model that reproduces quantum phenomena like superposition, entanglement, and teleportation within a classical local theory, while omitting contextuality and nonlocality. The model aims to provide insights into the interpretation of quantum theory and serve as a simplified playground for examining phenomena. The speaker introduces 'Mightdoor Theory,' a model designed to represent a locally definite but globally indefinite causal structure, emphasizing the use of local laboratories and joining rules.
🔄 Integrating Space-Time Elements into the Toy Model
The speaker elaborates on adding space-time elements to the toy model, setting it in 1+1 dimensions for simplicity. Each local laboratory is associated with a perception of flat space-time and communicates using photons, constrained by null lines representing future communication paths. The laboratories are depicted as triangles, with inputs and outputs, and an operational choice for the direction of photon transmission. The speaker introduces a coloring law as a local physical law that governs the interaction between neighboring triangles, ensuring stable causality and preventing closed timelike curves.
🔄 Exploring Local and Global Causality in the Toy Model
The speaker delves into the implications of the coloring law and operational choices within the toy model, highlighting the absence of closed timelike curves and the model's ability to represent relativistic phenomena through coarse-graining. The model allows for a Gaussian hypersurface analogue, where initial conditions and operational choices lead to an uncertain future causal structure. The speaker discusses the concept of a 'switch' in the literature, which involves superpositions of causal structures and the potential for local laboratories to perceive a definite causal order within a globally indefinite structure.
🔗 The Tension Between Local and Global Causal Orders
The speaker addresses the tension between local and global causal orders, emphasizing that the model allows for operational choices that enable a future of possibilities, governed by a local physical law through the coloring law. The model does not provide analogues for all dynamic causal structures found in relativity and is not fully operational, but rather presents a clash between local and global perspectives. The speaker wraps up by suggesting that the model could be generalized to higher dimensions if motivated, and invites questions about potential conflicts between local and global causal orders.
🤔 Future Directions and Generalization Challenges
In the final paragraph, the speaker contemplates future directions for the model, including generalizing it to higher dimensions and addressing the challenges of geometry and complexity that arise. They discuss the possibility of using higher-dimensional tessellations and the difficulties faced in generalizing such models, referencing the work on Finman checkerboards. The speaker also touches on the need to define curvature for the indefinite matrix and concludes with an open discussion about the local-to-global conflict in the context of space-times with unusual causal structures.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Quantum Gravity
💡Indefinite Causal Structures
💡Operationalism
💡Local Laboratories
💡Finite Dimensions
💡Joyal-Malkowski Isomorphism
💡Causaloid Framework
💡Toy Model
💡Might-or-Might-Not Be (Mombe) Structures
💡Coloring Law
💡Closed Timelike Curves (CTCs)
Highlights
Introduction of the concept of indefinite causal structures in the context of quantum gravity.
Citation of Alison Hardy's 2006 paper on probabilistic theories with non-fixed causal structure.
The aim to mix general relativity's deterministic, non-fixed causal structure with quantum theory's probabilistic, fixed causal structure.
Discussion on the importance of operationalism in the development of frameworks for quantum gravity.
Introduction of the concept of local laboratories and control derived from methodological operationalism.
The role of finite dimensions in simplifying the structure of quantum theory for precision of measurement.
Explanation of the Joy Malkowski isomorphism as a mathematical tool for representing states and channels in quantum mechanics.
Overview of the Casa Lite framework and its developments in quantum networks and process matrices.
The significance of toy models in providing insights and a simple playground for complex quantum phenomena.
The presentation of a toy theory aiming to model a locally definite but globally indefinite causal structure.
Description of the construction of the toy model using local laboratory rings and space-time elements.
The use of photons for communication between local laboratories in the 1+1 D toy model.
The concept of operational choice in the context of the toy model and its implications for causal order.
The coloring law as a local physical law that prevents the formation of closed timelike curves.
The exploration of the tension between local definiteness and global indefiniteness in the toy model.
The potential for generalizing the toy model to higher dimensions and its associated challenges.
The conclusion summarizing the toy model's contributions and limitations in the field of indefinite causal structures.
Transcripts
Browse More Related Video
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/HWOkjisIxc4/hq720.jpg)
Robert Spekkens: Leibniz’s principle of the identity of indiscernible as...
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/dlDTPX5Vb5s/hq720.jpg)
Lucien Hardy: Operational road to Quantum Gravity
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/c2RqTj0QlH0/hq720.jpg)
Nick Huggett: Cosmological Aspects of Quantum Gravity”
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/SmvE8bdMdtU/hq720.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEmCIAKENAF8quKqQMa8AEB-AH-CYAC0AWKAgwIABABGGUgZShlMA8=&rs=AOn4CLDXbgDNgCZ3-XYZMFVvYLZkc4qj0g)
Armond Duwell: Understanding quantum theory
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/URCzKFg4U1A/hq720.jpg)
Eduardo Martin Martinez: The theory of measuring quantum fields: myths and facts
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Quaou4VG0Jg/hq720.jpg)
Jeffrey Bub: ‘Yes! We have no bananas’
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Thanks for rating: