Jury finds Jesse Alvarez guilty of murder in the first degree in death of Cathedral Catholic teacher
TLDRIn the case of People of State of California vs. Jesse Milton Alvarez, the jury in San Diego County found the defendant guilty of first-degree murder for the death of Mario Fierro, with the verdict dated 2024-04-18. The presiding juror noted the trial's length and emotional impact, thanked the jurors for their service, and reminded them of the 90-day restriction on negotiating for book or movie rights. The judge emphasized the importance of the jury's role in democracy and commended them for their diligent consideration of the evidence and adherence to the law, concluding the proceedings with the sentencing date set for May 10th.
Takeaways
- π The case is titled 'The People of the State of California vs. Jesse Milton Alvarez', with case number S CD 288940.
- π― Jesse Milton Alvarez is found guilty of first-degree murder in violation of penal code section 187 A.
- π« The jury determined that Alvarez intentionally discharged a nine millimeter firearm, causing the death of Mario Fierro.
- π‘ The murder was premeditated, as Alvarez was found to have 'lied in wait' according to penal code section 190.2 A.
- βοΈ The verdict was recorded and signed by juror six, the presiding juror.
- π Not all verdict forms were filled out as required, which could be significant for an appellate record.
- π« The court waived the reading of the verdict, indicating that it was officially recorded.
- π The judge expressed gratitude to the jury for their service during the lengthy and emotional trial.
- π€« The judge instructed the jury that they can now discuss the case, but they cannot negotiate for movie or book rights for 90 days.
- π The jurors' names were sealed for privacy, and any contact attempts should be reported to the court.
- π The judge emphasized the importance of jury duty as a democratic responsibility, alongside voting.
- π§ The jury's decision, whether guilty or not guilty, is considered the right decision as it is based on the evidence and instructions provided.
- π A sentencing date was discussed and agreed upon for May 10th at 9 a.m.
- π¨ββοΈ The defendant, Jesse Milton Alvarez, was remanded without bail following the verdict.
Q & A
What is the case number for the trial involving Jesse Milton Alvarez?
-The case number is S CD 288940.
What crime was Jesse Milton Alvarez found guilty of?
-Jesse Milton Alvarez was found guilty of the crime of murder in the first degree.
What was the specific violation that led to the first-degree murder charge?
-The specific violation was in violation of penal code section 187 A.
What additional finding did the jury make regarding the murder?
-The jury found that the murder was committed by lying in wait, as defined by penal code section 190.2 A.
Who signed the verdict form?
-The verdict form was signed by juror six, the presiding juror.
What was the instruction given to the jury regarding discussing the case?
-The jury was told that they could choose who they wanted to talk to about the case, but they could not negotiate for movie or book rights for 90 days.
Why were the jurors' names sealed?
-The jurors' names were sealed to protect their identities, with the official record only referring to them by numbers.
What was the judge's stance on criticism of the jury's decision?
-The judge emphasized that any criticism of the jury's decision is unwarranted, as the jury made their decision based on the evidence and instructions provided during the trial.
What was the judge's comment on the importance of jury service?
-The judge stated that jury service is a duty of democracy, allowing citizens to participate in the democratic process both by voting and by serving on juries.
What was the sentencing date agreed upon for Jesse Milton Alvarez?
-The agreed upon sentencing date was May 10th.
What was the time set for the sentencing hearing?
-The sentencing hearing was scheduled for 9 a.m.
What was the final action taken by the court after the trial?
-The court was adjourned, and the defendant, Jesse Milton Alvarez, was remanded without bail.
Outlines
π Verdict Announcement in a First-Degree Murder Case
The first paragraph of the video script details the closing moments of a trial in which the defendant, Jesse Milton Alvarez, is found guilty of first-degree murder. The jury has delivered its verdict, stating that Alvarez intentionally discharged a nine millimeter firearm, causing the death of Mario Fierro. The presiding juror signs the verdict, and the judge acknowledges the jury's service, emphasizing the importance of their role in the democratic process. The judge also reminds the jurors of the restrictions on discussing the case and selling any rights related to it for a period of 90 days. The court's procedure is concluded with the sealing of the jurors' names for privacy and security.
π Court Adjournment and Sentencing Details
The second paragraph describes the procedural steps following the jury's verdict in the trial. The court acknowledges the presence of the defendant and counsel, and the defendant is remanded without bail. There is a brief discussion about the sentencing date, which is initially mentioned as April 9th but is corrected to May 10th after a clarification. The court then asks if there are any further matters to address from either the prosecution or the defense before officially adjourning the session. The court clerk confirms that all verdict forms are accounted for, and the court concludes with a note of thanks to all participants.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Verdict
π‘Murder in the First Degree
π‘Penal Code Section
π‘Jury
π‘Intentionally Discharged a Firearm
π‘Lying in Wait
π‘Presiding Juror
π‘Appellate Record
π‘
π‘Sealing Names
π‘Sentencing Date
π‘Remanded Without Bail
π‘Adjourned
Highlights
The jury found Jesse Milton Alvarez guilty of murder in the first degree.
The crime violated penal code section 187 A.
The jury determined that Alvarez intentionally and personally discharged a nine millimeter firearm.
The death of Mario Fierro was a direct result of Alvarez's actions.
The murder was committed by lying in wait, as defined by penal code section 190.2 A.
The verdict forms were not filled out as required under section 640.
The council waived the reading of the verdict as it was recorded.
The jury was thanked for their service, acknowledging the trial's length and emotional nature.
Jurors were informed they can now discuss the case with whomever they choose.
A 90-day waiting period was mentioned for jurors to negotiate any movie or book rights.
The jurors' names were sealed for privacy, with the court order required to open them.
The judge emphasized the importance of jury service as a democratic duty.
The judge defended the jury system against criticism, stating decisions are based on evidence and law.
The judge expressed gratitude to the jurors for their participation and commitment to the trial.
The defendant, Jesse Milton Alvarez, was remanded without bail.
A sentencing date was agreed upon for May 10th at 9 a.m.
The court session concluded with a reminder for the jury to notify the court if contacted by anyone regarding the case.
The judge adjourned the court, confirming all verdicts were recorded.
Transcripts
Browse More Related Video
Criminal Law: Murder β SIMPLIFIED
California Court Rules There is No Quota on Your Second Amendment Rights
Chapter 5: A Little History of the World by E.H. Gombrich classroom reading
Evidence Law: The Rule of Relevance and Admissibility of Character Evidence
Inside the trial of Louise Woodward: Baby killer or victim of flawed justice? | 60 Minutes Australia
Introduction to the Rules of Evidence: Module 1 of 6
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Thanks for rating: