The BEST Method to Teach DOCUMENT ANALYSIS (including Sourcing)
TLDRThe video script outlines a method for teaching students to analyze historical documents effectively. The approach is broken down into three steps: looking at the document to understand its content, looking through it to interpret its meaning, and teaching students to use document summaries in arguments. The script provides examples from AP History documents and emphasizes the importance of connecting document content to the argument's topic. A new sourcing method, SPY (Summarize, Prompt, and Why was it written), is introduced as a simplified alternative to the traditional HIP method, aiming to clarify the process for students.
Takeaways
- 📚 The core of teaching history involves helping students analyze and interpret historical documents, which is crucial for their overall success in history education.
- 🔍 The process of document interpretation is divided into two parts: 'looking at' the document to understand its content, and 'looking through' it to discern its meaning and implications.
- 📈 The three main types of documents students encounter are written, visual, and data-driven documents, and the interpretation process is similar for all.
- 👁️🗨️ When 'looking at' a document, students must be able to point out specific details and quotes to demonstrate their understanding of the text.
- 🤔 'Looking through' a document involves contextualizing the information within a historical framework, considering the time period and the creator's intent.
- 📊 For data-driven documents, identifying trends and shifts in data can provide insights into historical events and societal changes.
- 🎯 To effectively use a document in an argument, students should summarize the document in a concise statement and connect it back to the topic or prompt.
- 📝 The 'this shows' or 'this demonstrates' approach helps students link the document's content to their argument, ensuring they score points in assessments.
- 🔑 Sourcing a document can be simplified by asking 'why was this written?', which encompasses historical context, intended audience, purpose, and point of view.
- 🌐 The presenter suggests that many teachers are moving away from the traditional HIP (Historical Context, Intended Audience, Purpose, Point of View) method in favor of the simpler SPY (Summarize, Prompt, Why) method.
- 📚 The video script also references additional resources for teaching how to write a thesis and provides links to teacher resource packs for APUSH and AP World courses.
Q & A
What is the main focus of the video?
-The main focus of the video is to demonstrate how to teach students to analyze, interpret, and source various kinds of historical documents to support arguments in the context of history education.
What are the three types of documents mentioned in the video?
-The three types of documents mentioned are written documents, visual documents, and data-driven documents.
How does the speaker suggest students should 'look at' a document?
-The speaker suggests that students should 'look at' a document by identifying specific details and quotes within the text, using their finger to physically point to the information as a way to ensure they are accurately referring to the content.
What does 'looking through' a document entail?
-Looking through a document involves understanding the broader context and meaning of the document. This includes considering the historical period, the purpose of the document, and the intended audience, and drawing conclusions based on these factors.
How does the speaker suggest summarizing a document?
-The speaker suggests summarizing a document in one to two sentences, capturing the main idea or argument presented in the document, and framing it in a way that can be used to support a larger argument or thesis.
What is the importance of connecting a document's content to the topic of a prompt?
-Connecting a document's content to the topic of a prompt is crucial because it demonstrates how the document can be used as evidence to support an argument. This connection can often be the difference between earning a point and not earning a point in an exam setting.
What is the 'HIP' method mentioned in the video?
-The 'HIP' method stands for Historical Context, Intended Audience, and Purpose. It is a method used for sourcing documents, but the speaker suggests it can be confusing for students and offers an alternative approach.
What is the alternative to the 'HIP' method introduced in the video?
-The alternative to the 'HIP' method is the 'SPY' method, which stands for Summary, Prompt, and Why was this written. This method simplifies the sourcing process by focusing on these three key elements.
How does the 'SPY' method simplify the sourcing process?
-The 'SPY' method simplifies the sourcing process by combining the key elements of historical context, purpose, and point of view into one question: 'Why was this written?' This approach reduces the complexity of analyzing each element separately and makes it easier for students to understand and apply.
What additional resources does the speaker recommend for teachers?
-The speaker recommends visiting a link for a video on how to write a thesis and suggests looking at teacher resource packs for APUSH and AP World, which contain class activities for every topic and unit of those courses.
Outlines
📚 Teaching Document Analysis in History Class
This paragraph discusses the importance of teaching students to analyze documents in history education. The speaker introduces a two-part process for document interpretation: 'looking at' and 'looking through' the document. The first part involves identifying the explicit content of the document, while the second part requires understanding the document's meaning within its historical context. The speaker provides examples from three different types of documents: a written document from the APUSH CED, a visual document from AP World History, and a data-driven document from AP Euro. The goal is to help students learn how to summarize documents and use them to support arguments in their historical analysis.
📝 Connecting Documents to Arguments
In this paragraph, the speaker explains how to connect the analysis of a document to a broader argument. The process involves writing a summary of the document and then linking it to the argument using phrases like 'this shows' or 'this demonstrates.' The speaker emphasizes the importance of making this connection clear in writing to avoid losing points in assignments. The paragraph also addresses the challenge of sourcing documents and introduces an alternative method to the traditional HIP approach, suggesting the SPY method (Summarize, Prompt, and Why was it written?) as a simpler alternative. The speaker provides examples of how to apply the SPY method to different types of documents and encourages teachers to remember the challenges their students face when learning these skills.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Document Analysis
💡Supporting an Argument
💡Sourcing Documents
💡Historical Context
💡Visual Documents
💡Data-Driven Documents
💡APUSH (Advanced Placement United States History)
💡AP World (Advanced Placement World History)
💡APEuro (Advanced Placement European History)
💡Teaching Methodology
Highlights
The video introduces a method for teaching students to analyze documents, a crucial skill for history teachers and students.
The process of document interpretation is divided into two parts: 'looking at' and 'looking through' the document.
In 'looking at', students must identify specific phrases or quotes within the document to understand its literal content.
For the APUSH CED, the Republican Party platform of 1860 is used as an example to demonstrate the 'looking at' process.
The 'looking through' process involves understanding the historical context and implications of the document.
A visual document from AP World History is used to illustrate the analysis of images and their societal meanings.
The video explains how to summarize a document to support an argument, emphasizing the importance of connecting document content to the argument's topic.
The 'HIP' method (Historical Context, Intended Audience, Purpose) for sourcing documents is critiqued for causing confusion among students.
An alternative to 'HIP' is introduced: the 'SPY' method (Summarize, Prompt, Why was this written?), which simplifies the sourcing process.
The video provides a practical guide for teaching students to write a thesis and use documents effectively in their arguments.
Resources such as teacher resource packs for APUSH and AP World are mentioned, offering additional support for educators.
The importance of demonstrating the process step by step and empathizing with students' learning challenges is emphasized.
The video encourages teachers to teach the method in a way that students can understand and apply document analysis and sourcing effectively.
The process outlined in the video aims to improve students' ability to analyze and source documents, which is beneficial for their academic performance.
The video concludes with a call to action for teachers to apply the taught methods in their classrooms to maximize student learning.
Transcripts
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Thanks for rating: