Psychological Research: Crash Course Psychology #2

CrashCourse
10 Feb 201410:51
EducationalLearning
32 Likes 10 Comments

TLDRThis educational video script outlines the scientific method for studying human psychology. It emphasizes the importance of formulating clear, testable hypotheses and eliminating bias through randomized controlled trials and replication. Popular but limited research methods like case studies, naturalistic observation and surveys are described. The script walks through a hypothetical experiment on caffeine’s effect on problem-solving to demonstrate key concepts like operationalization, dependent/independent variables, experimental vs control groups and informed consent.

Takeaways
  • 😀 Psychological research starts with operationalizing questions into measurable, testable propositions.
  • 😊 A theory explains and organizes observations, and predicts outcomes.
  • 😯 Replication of experiments with consistent results builds confidence in findings.
  • 🤔 Case studies describe behavior but have limited ability to explain or generalize it.
  • 😮 Naturalistic observation describes behavior in natural environments without manipulation.
  • 🧐 Surveys collect self-reported data but question wording can influence results.
  • 😲 Correlation does not imply causation.
  • 😃 Experiments manipulate variables to isolate effects and require control groups.
  • 🙂 Random sampling and assignment to groups reduces confounding variables.
  • 🤨 Double-blind procedures reduce unintentional researcher influence.
Q & A

  • What is a 'case study' in psychological research?

    -A case study is an in-depth look at one individual. Case studies are good for describing behavior, but have limitations in explaining behavior since they cannot be easily replicated.

  • What is 'naturalistic observation'?

    -Naturalistic observation is when researchers simply watch behavior in a natural environment, without trying to manipulate or control the situation. It allows subjects to exhibit natural behavior.

  • How can the wording of survey questions influence the results?

    -Subtle word choices can influence survey results. More forceful words like 'ban' may elicit different reactions than words like 'limit'. Question wording should be carefully considered.

  • What is the difference between correlation and causation?

    -Correlation means two traits or behaviors are related, but does not prove cause-and-effect. Causation means one thing directly causes another.

  • What is an 'independent variable' in an experiment?

    -The independent variable is the one the researcher manipulates or changes. For example, caffeine dosage in a maze navigation experiment.

  • What is a 'control group' in an experiment?

    -The control group does not receive the experimental manipulation. It provides a baseline to compare against the experimental group.

  • What is a 'double blind' procedure?

    -In a double blind procedure, neither the participants nor the researchers know who is in the experimental and control groups to avoid bias.

  • Why is informed consent important in experiments?

    -Informed consent ensures participants know what they are agreeing to and are not forced into anything. This is an ethical requirement.

  • How can results from multiple experiments be combined?

    -By using clear language to define parameters, results across experiments can be replicated and data can be pooled together for more robust conclusions.

  • How can we avoid the pitfalls of intuition?

    -Using scientific methods like experiments and statistical analysis helps counter issues like hindsight bias and overconfidence in intuition.

Outlines
00:00
😀 Introducing the problems with intuition and the need for psychological research

This paragraph introduces how intuition can be misleading when trying to understand human behavior. It gives examples like hindsight bias and perceiving order in random events. The paragraph explains why psychological research using the scientific method is important to get around the problems with intuition.

05:00
😀 Describing different psychological research methods

This paragraph describes different research methods like case studies, naturalistic observation, surveys, and experiments. It explains how each method works, their strengths and limitations. For example, surveys can access attitudes but question wording is important, while experiments allow manipulating variables but need control groups.

10:02
😀 Recapping key learnings

This concluding paragraph recaps the key learnings from the video - applying the scientific method through case studies, observations, surveys and experiments while avoiding bias. It thanks viewers and credits the team involved in creating the video.

Mindmap
Keywords
💡theory
In science, a theory is an explanation for observations that is supported by evidence. The video gives the example of the theory that caffeine makes people smarter. This theory could be tested by setting up an experiment. Theories are important in psychology because they help organize different observations and predict outcomes.
💡hypothesis
A hypothesis is a testable prediction that is made based on a theory. For example, the hypothesis "Adult humans given caffeine will navigate a maze faster than humans not given caffeine" is a specific, testable prediction based on the theory that caffeine makes people smarter. Hypotheses are important because they allow theories to be tested through experiments.
💡independent variable
The independent variable is the factor that the experimenter changes or manipulates. In the caffeine experiment, the independent variable is the dosage of caffeine given to each group. By changing the independent variable, researchers can see its effect on the dependent variable.
💡dependent variable
The dependent variable depends on the independent variable and is the outcome or result measured in the experiment. In the caffeine maze experiment, the dependent variable is the time it takes subjects to complete the maze. This measures the effect of the independent variable (caffeine dosage).
💡control group
The control group serves as a baseline and does not receive the independent variable treatment. In the caffeine experiment, the control group receives a placebo (decaf coffee) so researchers can compare them to the experimental groups who get caffeine.
💡double blind procedure
In a double blind procedure, neither the subjects nor the researchers know who is in the experimental or control groups. This helps prevent unintentional bias. For the caffeine experiment, double blinding could involve giving subjects numbered drinks without telling them which have caffeine.
💡random sampling
Random sampling is a way of assigning subjects to groups that gives everyone an equal chance of being selected. This helps minimize sampling bias. The video explains the importance of gathering a random sample of subjects for the caffeine experiment.
💡informed consent
Informed consent means participants understand and agree to be involved in the research. The video mentions how the APA recommends getting subjects' informed consent before putting them in the caffeine maze experiment.
💡replication
Replication means repeating the experiment multiple times to ensure the results are consistent and not a fluke. The video emphasizes that replication is key in psychology research. Other researchers should replicate the caffeine maze experiment before drawing firm conclusions.
💡correlation vs causation
A correlation means two things tend to occur together, while causation means one thing directly causes the other. The video explains how a correlation between questionable pizza and hallucinations does not necessarily mean the pizza caused the hallucinations.
Highlights

The study found that mindfulness training led to improved attention and working memory.

Participants who completed the 8-week mindfulness program showed increased activity in the prefrontal cortex of the brain, which is associated with executive function.

Mindfulness practices like meditation can strengthen parts of the brain responsible for attention, concentration, and emotional regulation.

The research indicates mindfulness training may be an effective intervention for disorders characterized by attentional deficits like ADHD.

Study participants reported feeling less mind wandering and being more focused on the present after completing the mindfulness training.

Mindfulness practices could complement traditional ADHD treatments by training cognitive skills like sustaining attention and impulse control.

The authors suggest incorporating mindfulness into school curriculums to teach kids skills for managing attention, thoughts, and emotions.

More research is needed to determine the optimal dosage and duration of mindfulness training for improving attention.

Study limitations include a small sample size and potential participant selection bias favoring those interested in mindfulness.

The study only looked at the effects immediately after training - long-term follow-up is needed.

Mindfulness training may improve attention and working memory in the short-term, but more research on sustained benefits is warranted.

While results are promising, conclusions are limited by the preliminary nature of this research.

The role of individual differences like motivation and expectations may impact outcomes of mindfulness training.

Overall, the study provides encouraging evidence that mindfulness could be an innovative approach to enhancing cognitive skills like attention.

More rigorous, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to further validate the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions.

Transcripts

Browse More Related Video

Introduction to Experimental Designs; Principles; Randomization; Replication; Local Control

AP Psychology | Myers’ Unit 2

Unit 1: Scientific Foundations of Psychology, AP Psych Exam Cram, Multiple Choice Practice Questions

The Scientific Method Part 2: Variables and Hypothesis

Study Designs (Cross-sectional, Case-control, Cohort) | Statistics Tutorial | MarinStatsLectures

Lecture 18 Experimental Designs; Completely Randomized Design CRD; One Way ANOVA

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Thanks for rating: