Why all world maps are wrong
TLDRThe video script delves into the challenges of mapmaking, highlighting the inherent distortion that occurs when attempting to represent a spherical globe on a flat plane. It explains the concept of map projection and how different methods, such as the Mercator projection, prioritize certain attributes like shape preservation and navigational utility, over accuracy in size representation. The script also touches on the historical significance of the Mercator projection and its modern critique for perpetuating biases. It then contrasts this with the Gall-Peters projection, which offers a more accurate depiction of land area at the expense of shape distortion. The advent of GPS technology has shifted the focus from navigation to aesthetics and design in map projections. Despite the variety of projections available, the script concludes that there is no perfect solution, emphasizing the ongoing trade-offs and the importance of understanding these limitations when interpreting flat maps.
Takeaways
- π The inherent challenge in map making is that a spherical surface cannot be represented on a flat plane without distortion.
- π Mathematicians have developed various algorithms and projections to translate the globe into a flat map since the 1500s.
- π¦ Popular rectangular maps often use cylindrical projections, which involve projecting the globe onto a theoretical cylinder and then unrolling it.
- π Each projection method involves trade-offs concerning shape, distance, direction, and land area.
- π§ The Mercator projection is known for preserving the shape of countries and direction, making it useful for navigation, but it inaccurately represents the size of land masses.
- π A comparison of Africa and Greenland on a Mercator map shows a significant size distortion, with Greenland appearing larger than it actually is relative to Africa.
- π The Gall-Peters projection is an equal-area map that accurately represents the size of land masses but distorts their shapes.
- π°οΈ The advent of the global positioning system (GPS) in the late 1960s reduced the need for paper maps for navigation, leading to a shift in map projection choices towards aesthetics and design.
- πΊοΈ Despite criticisms, the Mercator projection is still used by web mapping tools like Google Maps for its ability to preserve shape and angles for close-up views.
- π Modern cartographers often opt for non-rectangular projections that balance the distortion of size and shape, such as the Winkel tripel projection adopted by the National Geographic Society.
- π There is no single 'right' map projection; each offers a different perspective on the planet, and the best representation of the earth's true shape is a globe.
Q & A
Why is it difficult to represent a spherical surface on a flat plane without distortion?
-The difficulty arises because the surface of a sphere cannot be perfectly flattened onto a plane without altering the shapes, distances, or areas of the objects it contains. This is due to the inherent geometric differences between a three-dimensional sphere and a two-dimensional plane.
What is the process called that is used to translate the globe into a flat map?
-The process is called projection. It involves mathematical algorithms that transform the spherical coordinates into a two-dimensional representation.
How does a cylindrical projection work in the context of map making?
-A cylindrical projection involves placing a theoretical cylinder over the globe and projecting each point of the sphere onto the cylinder's surface. Once this is done, the cylinder is 'unrolled' to create a flat, rectangular map.
What is the main issue with every map projection?
-Every map projection comes with trade-offs that affect shape, distance, direction, and land area. It is impossible to create a perfect projection that accurately represents all these aspects without some form of distortion.
Why was the Mercator projection popular for navigation before the advent of GPS?
-The Mercator projection was popular for navigation because it preserves direction, allowing sailors to draw a straight line between two points on the map, which would correspond to the correct compass angle to follow.
How does the Mercator projection distort the size of landmasses?
-The Mercator projection distorts the size of landmasses by enlarging areas closer to the poles and making them appear larger than they actually are. This is due to the way the projection varies the distance between latitude lines.
What is the Gall-Peters projection, and how does it differ from the Mercator projection?
-The Gall-Peters projection is an equal-area map projection that accurately represents the size of landmasses but distorts their shapes. Unlike the Mercator projection, which preserves shape and direction, the Gall-Peters projection aims to provide a more accurate representation of land area.
What technological advancement in the late 20th century changed the purpose of map making?
-The advent of the Global Positioning System (GPS) in the late 1960s changed the purpose of map making by reducing the need for paper maps for navigation. This shift allowed map projection choices to focus more on aesthetics, design, and presentation rather than navigational accuracy.
Why do some modern web mapping tools still use the Mercator projection?
-Some modern web mapping tools, like Google Maps, still use the Mercator projection because it preserves shape and angles, which makes close-up views of cities more accurate. A 90-degree turn on the map corresponds to an actual 90-degree turn on the ground.
What is the Winkel tripel projection, and why was it adopted by the National Geographic Society?
-The Winkel tripel projection is a non-rectangular map projection that provides a balanced compromise between size and shape accuracy. It was adopted by the National Geographic Society in 1998 because it offers a pleasant balance between these two aspects, making it a more accurate representation of the world for general purposes.
What is the best way to truly see what the Earth looks like, according to the script?
-The best way to truly see what the Earth looks like is to look at a globe, as it does not have the distortions that come with any map projection.
What is the main takeaway from the script regarding the use of flat maps?
-The main takeaway is that while flat maps are useful for certain purposes, they all involve trade-offs due to the necessary distortions from projecting a spherical surface onto a flat plane. There is no one 'right' map projection; each provides a different perspective on the planet.
Outlines
π The Challenge of Map Projections
This paragraph discusses the inherent challenges faced by map makers when attempting to represent a spherical globe on a flat map. It explains that any such projection will inevitably distort the map in some way, be it in shape, distance, direction, or area. The paragraph introduces the concept of cylindrical projections, which involve projecting the globe onto a theoretical cylinder and then unrolling that cylinder to create a flat map. It also highlights the Mercator projection, a popular map style that preserves country shapes and navigational directions but distorts the size of land masses, making some appear larger than they are in reality. The paragraph further points out that the Mercator projection, while useful for navigation before the advent of GPS, is now often criticized for its inaccuracies and potential to perpetuate biases.
π The Evolution of Map Projections
The second paragraph explores the evolution of map projections following the introduction of satellite technology and the global positioning system (GPS). With the shift away from paper maps for navigation, the focus of map projections has moved towards aesthetics, design, and presentation. The paragraph notes that cartographers have largely moved away from the Mercator projection for world maps due to its inaccuracies, instead opting for a variety of non-rectangular projections that better balance size and shape accuracy. It mentions the adoption of the Winkel tripel projection by the National Geographic Society in 1998 for its balance between these two factors. The paragraph concludes by emphasizing that there is no single 'right' projection and that cartographers must choose from a wide array of projections, each offering a unique perspective on the planet.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Map Projection
π‘Distortion
π‘Mercator Projection
π‘Gall-Peters Projection
π‘Global Positioning System (GPS)
π‘Cylindrical Projection
π‘Shape Preservation
π‘Navigation
π‘Winkel Tripel Projection
π‘Aesthetics and Design
π‘Globe
Highlights
The surface of a sphere cannot be represented as a plane without some form of distortion.
Mathematicians since the 1500s have been creating algorithms to translate the globe into a flat representation.
The process of creating a flat map from a globe is called projection.
Popular rectangular maps use cylindrical projections, which involve projecting the globe onto a theoretical cylinder.
Map projections come with trade-offs in shape, distance, direction, and land area.
The Mercator projection preserves the shape of countries and is used by Google Maps for navigation.
The Mercator projection was designed to provide the exact angle to follow on a compass for ocean navigation.
The Mercator projection distorts the size of landmasses, making Greenland appear about the same size as Africa, which is actually 14 times larger.
The Gall-Peters projection is an equal-area map that accurately displays the size of landmasses but distorts their shapes.
The advent of the global positioning system (GPS) in the late 60s reduced the need for paper maps for navigation.
Post-GPS, map projection choices became more focused on aesthetics, design, and presentation rather than navigational needs.
Modern cartographers often prefer non-rectangular projections that balance size and shape accuracy.
The Winkel tripel projection was adopted by the National Geographic Society in 1998 for its balance between size and shape accuracy.
There is no one 'right' map projection; cartographers and mathematicians have created a variety of projections, each offering a different perspective on the planet.
A globe provides the most accurate representation of the earth's shape, but flat maps will always involve trade-offs due to projections.
The Mercator projection has been criticized for perpetuating imperialist attitudes and ethnic bias against the third world.
Google Maps continues to use the Mercator projection for close-up views of cities due to its preservation of shape and angles.
Transcripts
Browse More Related Video
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Thanks for rating: