AP Physics Workbook 7.I Collisions "Updated and Fixed"
TLDRThis tutorial delves into the concepts of torque and rotation as covered in Unit 7 of the AP Physics workbook, specifically focusing on collisions. It explains the conservation of angular and linear momentum in various collision scenarios, emphasizing that angular momentum is conserved in all cases but linear momentum is not in cases where the object does not slide back. Kinetic energy conservation is only present in elastic collisions. The video also ranks the collisions based on the conservation of linear and angular momentum, using principles of torque and force to determine the outcomes.
Takeaways
- π The tutorial covers Unit Seven on Torque and Rotation in Physics, focusing on collisions.
- π Scenario analysis is crucial for understanding the conservation of angular and linear momentum in different collision cases.
- 𧱠Case A: The rod is fixed to the floor, hence no sliding back and r (the distance from the center of rotation) is zero.
- π Case B: The rod slides back after the collision since r is non-zero, as the collision occurs away from the center.
- πͺ Case D: Similar to Case A, the rod is fixed and hits at a corner, making r non-zero, but no sliding back occurs.
- π Conservation of angular momentum is discussed, stating that the initial angular momentum equals the final angular momentum, allowing the object to spin freely.
- π₯ Types of collisions are categorized into perfectly inelastic, inelastic, and elastic, with momentum being conserved in all but kinetic energy only in elastic collisions.
- β All cases (A, B, C, and D) are conservative for angular momentum because they all spin and rotate.
- π« Linear momentum is not conserved in cases A and D because the rods are fixed and do not slide back, but it is conserved in B and C.
- π Kinetic energy is not conserved in any scenario as the puck sticks to the rod after collision, resulting in perfectly inelastic collisions.
- π Ranking collisions based on linear momentum shows that B and C have the most, while A and D have less, with A being less than D.
- π For angular momentum ranking, A equals C and B equals D, with the difference arising from the radius (r) values and the resulting torques.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the tutorial?
-The main topic of the tutorial is torque and rotation in the context of collisions, specifically focusing on unit seven of the AP Physics workbook.
What are the two cases where the rod is fixed to the floor?
-The two cases where the rod is fixed to the floor are case A and case D. In both cases, the rod won't slide back, and the collision is akin to hitting a wall.
How does the distance 'r' affect the conservation of angular momentum?
-The distance 'r' is crucial for the conservation of angular momentum because it represents the radius from the center of rotation to the point of collision. Angular momentum is conserved when the initial and final angular momenta are equal, and 'r' plays a significant role in determining these values.
What is the law of conservation of angular momentum?
-The law of conservation of angular momentum states that the initial angular momentum of a system is equal to the final angular momentum, provided the object is allowed to spin freely and the angular velocity is transferred during the collision.
In which type of collision is kinetic energy conserved?
-Kinetic energy is conserved in an elastic collision. In perfectly inelastic and inelastic collisions, the total energy of the system decreases as some kinetic energy is lost when the objects stick together.
Why is linear momentum not conserved in case A and D?
-Linear momentum is not conserved in case A and D because the rods are fixed to the floor and do not slide back after the collision. This means that the velocity is not transferred from the puck to the rod, leading to a loss of linear momentum.
Which cases have linear momentum conservation?
-Cases B and C have linear momentum conservation because the pucks collide with the rods and stick to them, causing the rods to slide back and transfer the momentum from the puck to the rod.
How does the scenario describe perfectly inelastic collisions?
-The scenario describes perfectly inelastic collisions as instances where the puck sticks to the rod after the collision, resulting in a loss of kinetic energy and no conservation of this energy.
Based on the conservation of linear and angular momentum, how would you rank the collisions from least to most rightward linear momentum?
-From least to most rightward linear momentum, the ranking is A < D < B = C. Case A has the least because the rod is fixed and does not transfer momentum. Case D has some loss due to the non-zero 'r' value causing rotation. Cases B and C have the most because they involve a perfectly inelastic collision with momentum transfer.
How does the radius 'r' influence the ranking of collisions based on angular momentum?
-The ranking based on angular momentum is A = C < B = D. Cases A and C have 'r' equal to zero, resulting in no net torque and thus no angular momentum. Cases B and D have the same 'r' value, leading to the same torque and angular momentum due to the same distance from the axis of rotation and identical pucks.
Outlines
π Introduction to Torque and Rotation
This paragraph introduces the topic of the video, which is the physics workbook tutorial covering unit seven on torque and rotation. It explains a scenario with three cases (A, B, and D) where a puck collides with a rod in different conditions. The focus is on understanding whether the collisions are conservative in terms of angular and linear momentum. The paragraph emphasizes the law of conservation of angular momentum and how it applies to the given scenarios. It also discusses the types of collisions (perfectly inelastic, elastic, and inelastic) and their relation to the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy.
πͺοΈ Analysis of Collision Types and Conservation Laws
This paragraph delves deeper into the analysis of the collisions mentioned in the previous section. It discusses the conservation of linear and angular momentum in cases A, B, and C, and explains why case D is different. The paragraph clarifies that while all cases have conservative angular momentum due to spinning, only cases B and C have conservative linear momentum because they slide back after the collision. Kinetic energy is not conserved in any of the cases due to the perfectly inelastic nature of the collisions where the puck sticks to the rod. The paragraph also ranks the collisions based on the conservation of linear momentum, concluding that cases B and C have the most rightward linear momentum.
π Ranking Collisions based on Angular Momentum
The final paragraph focuses on ranking the collisions based on angular momentum. It uses the relationship between torque, force, and radius to explain why cases A and C have the same angular momentum, and why cases B and D also have the same but less than A and C. The explanation is based on the location of the collision relative to the axis of rotation and the resulting torque. The paragraph concludes by stating that cases B and D have the most clockwise angular momentum due to the same radius and force applied during the collision, while cases A and C have zero angular momentum because the collisions occur at the axis of rotation where the radius is zero.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Torque
π‘Rotation
π‘Conservative
π‘Angular Momentum
π‘Collision
π‘Linear Momentum
π‘Kinetic Energy
π‘Perfectly Inelastic Collision
π‘Radius (r)
π‘Work
π‘Force
Highlights
The tutorial covers unit seven on torque and rotation, focusing on collision scenarios.
In case A, the rod is fixed to the floor and won't slide back, with the distance of collision (r) being zero.
Case B involves a rod that slides back with a non-zero collision distance (r) since it hits at a corner away from the center.
Case D is similar to hitting a wall, with the rod fixed to the ground and hitting at a corner, resulting in a non-zero collision distance (r).
Angular momentum is conserved when the initial equals the final, allowing the object to spin freely.
All three types of collisions (perfectly inelastic, elastic, and inelastic) conserve momentum, but only elastic collisions conserve kinetic energy.
Cases A, B, and C all have conservative angular momentum because they are allowed to spin and rotate.
Linear momentum is only conserved in cases B and C, as A and D do not slide back after the collision.
Kinetic energy is not conserved in any scenario because the puck sticks to the rod after the collision, resulting in perfectly inelastic collisions.
Cases B and C have the most rightward linear momentum due to the puck's velocity being transferred to the rod.
Case A has the least linear momentum because the rod is fixed to the floor and does not move.
Case D loses some but not all linear momentum due to the collision occurring at a distance from the axis of rotation.
Angular momentum can be seen as torque times delta t, and torque can also be seen as the radius times the force.
Cases A and C have no net torque created due to the collision occurring at the axis of rotation, resulting in zero angular momentum.
Cases B and D have the same amount of clockwise angular momentum due to the same radius and force applied.
The tutorial provides a comprehensive understanding of the conservation of angular and linear momentum in various collision scenarios.
Transcripts
Browse More Related Video
AP Physics Workbook 7.I Collisions "Old and Lack Full Explanation"
Conservation of Linear Momentum
Elastic and Inelastic Collisions
AP Physics 1 Momentum Review
2021 Live Review 7 | AP Physics C: Mechanics | Angular Momentum & Rotational Collisions
2022 Live Review 6 | AP Physics C: Mechanics | Rotational Dynamics and Angular Momentum
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Thanks for rating: