War & Human Nature: Crash Course World History 204

31 Jul 201410:37
32 Likes 10 Comments

TLDRIn this Crash Course World History episode, John Green discusses the complex and controversial topic of war throughout human history. He challenges the notion that history is primarily about war, highlighting the importance of cooperation and trade. Green explores the question of whether war is part of human nature, examining philosophical debates between Hobbes and Rousseau, and delving into anthropological and archaeological evidence. He suggests that while aggression may be an innate human trait, war is not an inevitable outcome and that human choices and institutions have evolved beyond basic biological imperatives.

  • 🌍 John Green introduces the topic of war as a controversial subject in world history, acknowledging its significance despite his preference for focusing on cooperation and trade.
  • 🤔 The video addresses the question of whether war is part of 'human nature', exploring philosophical perspectives from thinkers like Nietzsche, Hobbes, and Rousseau.
  • 👥 Anthropological and archaeological evidence suggests that violence has been a part of human history since pre-civilization, with examples of warfare dating back thousands of years.
  • 🛡️ The distinction between individual violence and organized war is discussed, with historical evidence pointing towards raiding as a more common form of conflict among early human societies.
  • 🧬 Evolutionary biology is considered as a potential explanation for human aggression and violence, with the caveat that such theories should be approached with skepticism to avoid misuse.
  • 🧬 The idea of biological imperatives, such as the protection of genetic traits and competition for resources like food and mates, is presented as a possible factor in the development of warlike behavior.
  • 🏹 The historical context of war is examined, with the shift from raiding to organized conflict linked to the rise of kingdoms and states.
  • 💭 Soldiers' motivations for fighting are explored, including the sense of transcendence, loyalty to comrades, and the excitement of combat.
  • 🔥 The complex emotions associated with war, such as joy in destruction and the thrill of fighting, are acknowledged as part of the human experience.
  • 🧠 The video emphasizes the importance of recognizing free will in soldiers and the choices they make, challenging the notion that war is an inevitable outcome of human nature.
  • 🌟 The potential for breaking the cycle of violence is highlighted, with the evolution of human institutions as evidence that change and peace are possible through human choices.
Q & A
  • What is John Green's initial stance on discussing the history of war in Crash Course World History?

    -John Green is hesitant about discussing the history of war because he feels it has been well-covered elsewhere and he finds cooperation and trade more interesting than the violent and destructive aspects of world history.

  • How does John Green view the relationship between history and war?

    -John Green believes that while war is a significant part of world history, it is not the primary focus. He is more interested in aspects such as cooperation and trade that he thinks ultimately matter more.

  • What is the philosophical debate regarding human nature and war?

    -The philosophical debate revolves around whether humans are naturally war-like and violent (Hobbes) or naturally peaceful until civilization corrupts them (Rousseau).

  • What does anthropology suggest about pre-civilization social orders and violence?

    -Anthropology suggests that pre-civilization social orders were likely violent, with evidence of warfare and killings going back thousands of years. However, the violence was more often in the form of raids rather than organized warfare.

  • How might evolutionary biology contribute to a warlike human nature?

    -Evolutionary biology might suggest that aggression is an innate human trait, with humans being biologically driven to protect their kin and resources, which could lead to violence and war under certain conditions.

  • What are some reasons humans might have gone to war in the past?

    -In the past, humans might have gone to war due to competition for scarce resources like food and mates, and to protect their kin groups. Raiding was a common form of conflict, rather than organized state warfare.

  • How does the concept of 'state of nature' relate to the debate on human nature and war?

    -The 'state of nature' refers to a hypothetical condition of human life without civilization, and it is used to discuss whether humans were more violent (Hobbes) or peaceful (Rousseau) in such a condition.

  • What does Karl Marlantes' experience in Vietnam reveal about soldiers' motivations for fighting?

    -Karl Marlantes' experience reveals that soldiers may find a sense of transcendence, excitement, and even joy in destruction through fighting, and that they fight for each other and their group out of loyalty and camaraderie.

  • How does John Green address the idea that war might be an inevitable part of human nature?

    -John Green argues that while humans may have aggressive tendencies, war is not inevitable. He emphasizes that humans have free will and that institutions have evolved beyond the need for violence, showing that the cycle of violence can be broken.

  • What is the significance of the quote from a former pilot about enjoying napalming the enemy?

    -The quote highlights the complex and sometimes disturbing emotions soldiers may experience in war, including the joy of combat. It raises questions about how to reconcile the human capacity for violence with the moral choices soldiers make.

  • What is the main message John Green conveys about the nature of war and human choices?

    -John Green conveys that while there may be biological and evolutionary factors that contribute to war, it is essential to recognize human agency and the capacity for choice. He argues that war is not a foregone conclusion and that societal progress is possible beyond the cycle of violence.

🌍 Introduction to War in World History

John Green introduces the topic of war in world history, acknowledging the controversy and complexity of the subject. Despite Crash Course's general avoidance of war history due to its violent nature and prevalence in other sources, Green agrees to discuss it abstractly, focusing on why humans engage in warfare and whether it is part of human nature. He contrasts the ideas of philosophers like Nietzsche, who embraced war, with those of Hobbes and Rousseau, who debated the innate war-like or peaceful nature of humans. Green sets the stage for a discussion on the role of war throughout history and its relation to human nature.

🤔 The Roots of Human Aggression and War

This paragraph delves into the potential evolutionary roots of human aggression and the historical context of war. It discusses the anthropological and archaeological evidence suggesting that violence has been a part of human societies since pre-civilization, challenging Rousseau's view of a peaceful 'state of nature.' The paragraph explores the idea that humans may have evolved to be aggressive for survival and reproductive purposes, leading to conflicts over resources like food and mates. It also touches on the psychological aspects of war, such as the sense of transcendence and camaraderie experienced by soldiers, and the thrill of combat. Green emphasizes the importance of recognizing free will in choosing to engage in violence, despite any biological predispositions.

🎥 Behind the Scenes of Crash Course Production

In the final paragraph, John Green transitions from the heavy topic of war to the lighter subject of Crash Course's production process. He thanks the team in the Chad and Stacey Emigholz Studio in Indianapolis for their work and acknowledges the support of the community through Subbable.com, a voluntary subscription service that helps fund the educational content. Green encourages viewers to continue supporting Crash Course to keep the videos free and accessible to everyone, ending with a reminder to 'be awesome,' a phrase from his hometown.

War is a controversial and complex subject that involves organized conflict between states or groups. In the context of the video, war is discussed as a significant aspect of world history, despite the presenter's preference for focusing on cooperation and trade. The video explores the reasons behind warfare and whether it is an inherent part of human nature.
💡Human Nature
Human nature refers to the inherent characteristics and behaviors that are typically attributed to all human beings. The video questions whether violence and the propensity for war are ingrained in human nature, examining philosophical perspectives from thinkers like Hobbes and Rousseau.
Anthropology is the study of human societies, cultures, and their development. In the video, anthropology is used to infer insights about pre-civilization human behavior, particularly regarding violence and warfare, by observing modern hunter-gatherer societies.
Evolution refers to the process by which species change over time through genetic variation and natural selection. The video considers the possibility that evolutionary imperatives might have shaped a warlike human nature, particularly through the need to protect kin and secure resources like food and mates.
💡Kin Selection
Kin selection is an evolutionary strategy where individuals favor the reproductive success of relatives, thus ensuring the propagation of shared genetic traits. In the video, kin selection is discussed as a potential evolutionary reason for humans to engage in warfare to protect their kin group.
💡Resource Competition
Resource competition refers to the struggle between individuals or groups for access to limited resources. The video suggests that competition for resources like food and mates could have been a driving force behind early forms of warfare and violence.
Raids, in the context of the video, refer to the historical practice of attacking and stealing from other groups, often for resources or as a form of warfare. Raids were a common form of conflict in pre-civilization societies and are distinct from modern organized warfare.
Transcendence refers to the experience of going beyond the limits of one's normal existence or understanding, often associated with a sense of being part of something greater. In the video, the concept is used to describe the psychological experience of soldiers who find meaning and a sense of unity through combat.
💡Free Will
Free will is the ability to make choices that are genuinely one's own. The video emphasizes that despite any biological or evolutionary predispositions towards violence, humans possess free will, which allows them to choose whether or not to engage in violent behavior.
Institutions are established organizations or structures in society that serve to promote stability and order. The video points out that while humans may not have evolved significantly in the past thousand years, human institutions have, reflecting choices beyond basic survival needs.

John Green introduces the topic of war in world history, acknowledging its controversial nature and his preference for focusing on cooperation and trade.

Despite the common focus on war in history classes, Green argues that history is not primarily about war.

The episode will explore the question of why humans go to war and whether it is part of 'human nature'.

Hobbes and Rousseau's contrasting views on human nature are discussed, with Hobbes seeing humans as war-like and Rousseau as naturally peaceful.

Anthropological evidence suggests that pre-civilization societies were violent, supporting Hobbes's view of the 'state of nature'.

Archaeological findings and cave paintings indicate that violence and warfare have existed for thousands of years.

The distinction between individual killings and organized warfare is made, with most pre-civilization violence being raid-based.

Aggression may be an innate human trait, potentially leading to violence and war under certain conditions.

Evolutionary biology is suggested as a possible explanation for war, with competition for resources like food and mates.

The idea that protecting one's kin group and ensuring the survival of one's genes could contribute to a warlike nature is discussed.

Karl Marlantes's experiences as a Marine lieutenant in Vietnam and his writings on war are introduced.

Soldiers may find a sense of transcendence and joy in destruction through combat, according to Marlantes.

Loyalty to one's group and the excitement of fighting are cited as powerful motivators for soldiers.

The episode emphasizes the importance of recognizing free will in soldiers and the choices they make.

The potential misuse of evolutionary biology to explain cultural characteristics like warlike behavior is cautioned against.

The episode concludes with a reminder that while humans may not have evolved much in a thousand years, our institutions have, and choices beyond basic needs shape our history.

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Thanks for rating: