Other Issues Concerning Evidence: Module 4 of 6

LawShelf
2 Jul 202114:59
EducationalLearning
32 Likes 10 Comments

TLDRThis module explores the Federal Rules of Evidence, focusing on Article 9 for authenticating non-testimonial evidence, Article 10 for original document requirements, and Article 5 detailing privileges. It discusses methods of authentication, chain of custody, self-authenticating items, and the best evidence rule, emphasizing the importance of maintaining confidentiality and accuracy in legal proceedings.

Takeaways
  • 📜 Module 4 discusses the Federal Rules of Evidence, focusing on Article 9 (authentication of evidence), Article 10 (original writing requirements), and Article 5 (privileges).
  • 🔍 Article 9 requires non-testimonial evidence to be authenticated before it can be introduced at trial, a process that involves demonstrating the item is what the proponent claims it to be.
  • 👁 Witnesses with first-hand knowledge can authenticate evidence by testifying that the object is indeed what the proponent claims, as illustrated in the United States versus Blackwell case.
  • 🔑 The appearance, content, or distinctive characteristics of an item can be used for authentication without requiring conclusive proof, as shown in a fraud case involving seized letters.
  • 🔗 Establishing a chain of custody is crucial for authenticating evidence, ensuring that the evidence presented has not been tampered with from the crime scene to the courtroom.
  • 📝 The four steps of the authentication process include marking the evidence, identifying it, authenticating it, and offering it to the judge, where it may be objected to by the opposing side.
  • 🚫 Rule 902 identifies certain items as self-authenticating, not requiring additional evidence for admission, such as public documents and notarized documents.
  • 📚 The best evidence rule, under Article 10, prefers the use of original documents, recordings, and photographs to prevent fraud and ensure accuracy.
  • 📑 Rule 1003 allows for the admission of duplicates unless there is a question about the original's authenticity or admitting the duplicate would be unfair.
  • 📝 Exceptions to the best evidence rule include situations where originals are lost, beyond judicial reach, or when a summary is more convenient for voluminous materials.
  • 🗣 Article 5 outlines the general rule on privileges, allowing courts to apply them on a case-by-case basis, and evolve with changing conditions.
  • 🤐 Privileges protect certain confidential communications from disclosure in judicial proceedings, and can only be waived if intentionally divulged to third parties or not invoked by the holder.
Q & A

  • What is the primary focus of Module 4 in the context of the Federal Rules of Evidence?

    -Module 4 primarily focuses on Article 9, which covers the requirements and procedures for authenticating evidence, Article 10, which sets forth the original writing requirements for evidence, and Article 5, which specifies the rules regarding privileges.

  • What is the significance of authenticating non-testimonial evidence in a trial?

    -Authenticating non-testimonial evidence is crucial as it ensures that each piece of evidence, such as documents, photographs, recordings, and tangible items, is verified to be what the proponent claims it to be before it is introduced in court.

  • How does Rule 901 of the Federal Rules of Evidence define the process of authenticating evidence?

    -Rule 901 explains that the proponent of an item of evidence has the burden of demonstrating that the item is what they claim it to be, and the trial judge determines whether the authentication standards have been met.

  • What are the methods mentioned in the script for authenticating a piece of evidence?

    -The methods include having a witness with first-hand knowledge testify about the object, identifying the item's distinctive characteristics, and establishing a chain of custody.

  • Can you provide an example of how a photograph was authenticated in the script?

    -In the case of United States versus Blackwell, the prosecution authenticated a photograph of a hotel room by having a detective who searched the room testify about its layout and other distinctive features that matched the photograph.

  • What is the purpose of establishing a chain of custody for evidence?

    -Establishing a chain of custody is necessary to authenticate evidence, particularly in criminal prosecutions, to show that the evidence introduced is the same material that was collected at the crime scene and has not been tampered with.

  • What are the four steps involved in the authentication process as described in the script?

    -The four steps are marking the evidence, identifying the piece of evidence, authenticating it, and offering the piece of evidence to the judge.

  • What does Rule 902 of the Federal Rules of Evidence pertain to?

    -Rule 902 classifies certain items as self-authenticating, meaning these items do not require extrinsic evidence of authenticity prior to admission.

  • What is the 'Best Evidence Rule' and why is it important?

    -The 'Best Evidence Rule' requires that the original document or recording be presented in court, as it helps prevent fraud, allows for the examination of the original for defects or alterations, and enhances the probability of accuracy.

  • What are some exceptions to the 'Best Evidence Rule' mentioned in the script?

    -Some exceptions include situations where all originals have been lost or destroyed, when the original is beyond any available judicial process, and when summaries of voluminous materials are admissible.

  • What is the general rule on privileges as explained by Article 5 of the Federal Rules of Evidence?

    -Article 5 explains that privileges allow a person to refuse to disclose, or prohibits others from disclosing, certain confidential information in a judicial proceeding, and these are applied on a case-by-case basis.

  • How does the attorney-client privilege work as per the script?

    -The attorney-client privilege applies to communications made in confidence between an attorney and a client seeking legal advice privately, extends indefinitely even after the client's death, and promotes the integrity of the justice system by encouraging open communication.

  • What is the significance of Rule 502 in the context of the Federal Rules of Evidence?

    -Rule 502 codified the attorney-client privilege in the Federal Rules of Evidence in 2008, providing clarity and legal recognition to the privilege which encourages full communication between attorneys and clients.

Outlines
00:00
🔍 Authentication of Evidence in Trials

This paragraph discusses the importance of authenticating evidence in court proceedings, particularly focusing on non-testimonial evidence such as documents, photographs, and tangible items. Article 9 of the Federal Rules of Evidence is highlighted, which outlines the requirements and procedures for evidence authentication. The process involves the proponent demonstrating that the item is what they claim it to be, with the trial judge making the final decision. The paragraph also covers various methods of authentication, such as witness testimony, distinctive characteristics, and establishing a chain of custody. Examples from cases like United States versus Blackwell and United States versus Collado illustrate these methods. Additionally, the paragraph outlines the four steps in the authentication process: marking the evidence, identifying it, authenticating it, and offering it into evidence.

05:00
📚 Original Document Rule and Privileges

This paragraph delves into the original document rule, which requires that the original document be presented in court unless specified exceptions apply. The rule aims to prevent fraud and ensure accuracy by allowing examination of the original document. Article 10 of the Federal Rules of Evidence is mentioned, setting forth these requirements. Exceptions to the rule include situations where the original is lost, destroyed, or beyond judicial process. The paragraph also touches on the concept of self-authenticating documents under Rule 902, which do not require additional evidence of authenticity. Furthermore, the discussion extends to the general rule on privileges under Article 5 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, explaining that privileges allow certain confidential information to be withheld from judicial proceedings. Privilege is personal and must be invoked by the holder, with the paragraph providing examples of recognized privileges such as attorney-client and spousal privileges.

10:01
🤝 Legal Privileges and Their Application

This paragraph explores various legal privileges, emphasizing their role in protecting confidential communications in legal proceedings. The attorney-client privilege is discussed in detail, noting its codification in Rule 502 of the Federal Rules of Evidence in 2008. The paragraph highlights the historical roots of this privilege and its importance in fostering open communication between attorneys and clients, thereby enhancing the integrity of the justice system. Other privileges mentioned include spousal privileges, which protect confidential marital communications and apply in both civil and criminal proceedings, and the doctor-patient privilege, which shields confidential communications between a patient and their healthcare provider. The paragraph also notes that privileges can vary by state and may be subject to legislative or court recognition, with examples of other privileges such as counselor-victim privilege and informant identity privilege.

Mindmap
Keywords
💡Authentication
Authentication in the context of the video refers to the legal process of proving that an item of evidence is what it is claimed to be. It is a fundamental requirement for non-testimonial evidence such as documents and photographs before they can be introduced in a trial. The script explains that under Rule 901, the proponent of the evidence must demonstrate its authenticity, and the judge decides if the standard is met. An example from the script is the authentication of a photograph of a hotel room, where a detective's testimony about the room's layout matched the photograph.
💡Non-testimonial Evidence
Non-testimonial evidence consists of tangible items like documents, photographs, and recordings. The script clarifies that these items require authentication before they can be admitted into court, unlike testimonial evidence, which is presented by a witness under oath. The video emphasizes that the authenticity of such items is crucial for their admissibility in court.
💡Article 9
Article 9 of the Federal Rules of Evidence is highlighted in the script as the section that covers the requirements and procedures for authenticating evidence. It serves as the basis for how evidence must be presented in court to be considered valid and is a key part of the legal process described in the video.
💡Original Writing Requirement
This concept, as discussed under Article 10, stipulates that the original form of evidence, such as documents or recordings, should be presented in court unless specific exceptions apply. The script mentions that this requirement helps prevent fraud and enhances accuracy, as original documents are less susceptible to errors than copies or summaries.
💡Best Evidence Rule
The Best Evidence Rule, as explained in the script, is a legal principle that prefers the use of the original document or recording over secondary evidence like copies or summaries. The video provides examples of exceptions to this rule, such as when the original is lost or when it would be inconvenient to present voluminous materials in court.
💡Chain of Custody
Chain of custody is a critical aspect of evidence authentication, as described in the script. It refers to the chronological documentation or paper trail that records the handling of evidence from the time it was collected to when it is presented in court. The script uses the example of a police officer testifying about the handling of a plastic bag containing cocaine to illustrate the importance of establishing an unbroken chain of custody.
💡Privilege
Privilege, as outlined in Article 5 of the Federal Rules of Evidence discussed in the script, is a legal right that allows a person to refuse to disclose certain confidential information in a judicial proceeding. The video explains that privileges are personal and can only be asserted by the holder, with examples including attorney-client privilege and spousal privilege.
💡Attorney-Client Privilege
Attorney-client privilege is a specific type of privilege that protects communications between an attorney and their client, as mentioned in the script. It is designed to encourage open communication between clients and attorneys, leading to better legal advice and representation. The video provides the context of this privilege being codified in Rule 502 in 2008, emphasizing its importance in the U.S. legal system.
💡Spousal Privilege
Spousal privilege, as discussed in the script, includes the privilege of spousal immunity and the privilege for confidential marital communications. The former prevents a spouse from being compelled to testify against the other in a criminal case, while the latter protects confidential communications made between spouses during marriage, as long as they were made in the context of intimacy.
💡Doctor-Patient Privilege
The doctor-patient privilege, while not a common law privilege, is recognized in many states to protect confidential communications between a patient and their healthcare provider. The script explains that for this privilege to apply, there must be a professional relationship, the communication must occur during treatment, and the information must be necessary for the patient's treatment.
💡Codification
Codification in the context of the video refers to the formal process of incorporating legal principles or rules into a written code or set of laws. The script mentions the codification of the attorney-client privilege in Rule 502 of the Federal Rules of Evidence in 2008, signifying an important development in the legal framework governing privileges.
Highlights

Authentication of non-testimonial evidence is required before introduction at trial, including tangible items and excludes testimonial evidence presented by witnesses.

Rule 901 places the burden on the proponent to demonstrate the item is what they claim, with the trial judge making the final decision on authentication standards.

Section 901 provides methods for authenticating evidence, such as witness testimony with firsthand knowledge or identifying distinctive characteristics.

Establishing a chain of custody is crucial for authenticating evidence, especially in criminal prosecutions, to show the evidence has not been tampered with.

The authentication process involves marking the evidence, identifying it, proving its authenticity, and offering it to the judge, with potential objections and judicial responses.

Rule 902 classifies certain items as self-authenticating, not requiring extrinsic evidence of authenticity prior to admission, such as public documents and notarized documents.

The best evidence rule prefers the production of the original document to prevent fraud and enhance accuracy, with exceptions for lost or destroyed originals.

Rule 1003 allows duplicates unless there is a genuine question about the original's authenticity or admitting the duplicate would be unfair.

The best evidence rule does not exclude photocopies or similar replicas, but applies to summaries or transcripts fundamentally different from the original.

Certain exceptions to the best evidence rule include cases where the original is beyond judicial process or when common sense dictates an exception, such as with lengthy recordings.

Article 5 of the Federal Rules of Evidence outlines the general rule on privileges, allowing courts to apply privileges on a case-by-case basis.

Privilege permits a person to refuse disclosure of certain confidential information in judicial proceedings, and must be invoked by the holder, with waiver possible under certain conditions.

The attorney-client privilege, codified in Rule 502, encourages open communication between attorneys and clients, promoting the integrity of the justice system.

Spousal privileges, including spousal immunity and protection of confidential marital communications, vary in application and may survive dissolution of marriage.

The doctor-patient privilege protects confidential communications and applies to various health practitioners, with state-specific variations in scope and applicability.

Other privileges, such as counselor-victim and informant identity privileges, exist and may be recognized by state legislatures or courts.

The module concludes with an introduction to the next topic: rules of evidence addressing witnesses and witness testimony.

Transcripts

Browse More Related Video

001 General Principles | Rules on Evidence | by Dean Riano

Character Evidence (FRE 404-405, 412-415), Habit & Routine (FRE 406) [LEAP Preview — Evidence: 3/14]

003 Rules of Admissibility (Rule 130) | Rules on Evidence | by Dean Riano

Impeachment of a Witness (FRE 607-609, 611, 613) [LEAP Preview — Evidence: 6/14]

The Federal Rules of Evidence - Part 1

Introduction to the Rules of Evidence: Module 1 of 6

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Thanks for rating:

Related Tags
Legal EvidenceAuthenticationPrivilegesFederal RulesArticle 9Article 10Article 5Witness TestimonyChain of CustodyBest EvidenceAttorney-Client