NIST RMF FULLY EXPLAINED (IN PLAIN ENGLISH)

Gerald Auger, PhD - Simply Cyber
22 Nov 202272:47
EducationalLearning
32 Likes 10 Comments

TLDRIn this informative session, Gerald Dozier offers an in-depth exploration of the NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF), a critical governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) function utilized by federal IT systems. Despite his personal reservations, labeling it as 'a dinosaur,' Dozier acknowledges its value, especially in U.S. government contexts. He systematically dissects the RMF's six-step process, from system categorization to control monitoring, providing practical insights and examples. The session also addresses the challenges of implementation, the importance of the System Security Plan (SSP), and the audit process, ultimately aiming to clarify the comprehensive approach to information security that the RMF entails.

Takeaways
  • πŸ“š The NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) is a structured approach for implementing a comprehensive information security program, primarily used by federal IT systems.
  • πŸ”§ The RMF is considered by the speaker to be somewhat outdated, favoring the NIST Cyber Security Framework as a more evolved and mature version.
  • πŸ‘¨β€πŸ« Gerald Dozier, the speaker, provides an educational broadcast on the RMF, aiming to make it accessible and valuable for the audience, despite his personal views on its complexity.
  • πŸ”„ The RMF is a six-step process that includes categorizing information systems, selecting controls, implementing controls, assessing controls, authorizing the system, and monitoring controls.
  • πŸ”’ The RMF process can be quite involved, with step three (implementing controls) being particularly labor-intensive and time-consuming.
  • ⚠️ Tailoring of controls is an important aspect of the RMF, allowing organizations to adjust the level of security to better fit their specific needs and circumstances.
  • πŸ“ Documentation is a critical component of the RMF, with the System Security Plan (SSP) serving as a central document detailing how security controls are implemented.
  • πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™‚οΈ The assessment of controls is typically performed by an independent auditor to ensure objectivity and thoroughness in verifying the effectiveness of the implemented controls.
  • 🏒 The RMF is especially relevant for government-level systems, but it can also be voluntarily implemented by non-federal organizations seeking a structured security approach.
  • ♻️ Continuous monitoring and periodic re-assessment are integral to the RMF, reflecting the need for ongoing risk management as systems and threats evolve.
  • 🚫 The speaker emphasizes the importance of proper system disposal, noting that it is often overlooked but is a formalized process necessary for security.
Q & A
  • What is the NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF)?

    -The NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) is a guideline used by federal IT systems for a structured information security program. It is considered a GRC function and is a comprehensive approach to managing risks associated with information systems.

  • Why might someone view the NIST RMF as a dinosaur?

    -The speaker, Gerald Dozier, refers to the NIST RMF as a dinosaur because he believes it's not as evolved or mature as the NIST Cyber Security Framework, which he prefers for its more modern approach to risk management.

  • What are the six steps of the NIST RMF process?

    -The six steps of the NIST RMF process are: 1) Categorize the information system, 2) Select the controls, 3) Implement the controls, 4) Assess the controls, 5) Authorize the system, and 6) Monitor the controls.

  • Why is the first step of the NIST RMF, categorizing the information system, considered quick?

    -The first step is considered quick because it involves determining the level of security control needed for the system based on the type of data it contains, which can be done relatively swiftly compared to the subsequent steps.

  • What is the purpose of tailoring controls in the NIST RMF?

    -Tailoring controls allows for the addition or removal of controls to better suit the specific needs of an organization. It enables customization beyond the baseline controls selected during step two of the RMF process.

  • Why is step three of the NIST RMF, implementing the controls, considered the most work-intensive?

    -Step three is the most work-intensive because it involves configuring systems, establishing processes, and documenting policies to put the selected controls into practice, which requires a significant amount of effort and time.

  • What role does an independent auditor typically play in step four of the NIST RMF?

    -In step four, an independent auditor verifies whether the controls that have been implemented are actually being executed correctly. This independent assessment helps ensure the objectivity and effectiveness of the control measures.

  • What is the significance of the System Security Plan (SSP) in the NIST RMF process?

    -The System Security Plan (SSP) is a critical document in the NIST RMF process. It provides a comprehensive overview of how security controls are implemented within a system and is often the first document requested by auditors or new hires.

  • Why is it important for auditors to understand the controls they are assessing during a NIST RMF audit?

    -It's important for auditors to understand the controls they are assessing to effectively communicate with the IT personnel and accurately evaluate the implementation of the controls. Failing to do so can lead to miscommunication, inaccurate assessments, and loss of credibility.

  • What does the acronym 'ATO' stand for in the context of the NIST RMF?

    -In the context of the NIST RMF, ATO stands for Authority to Operate. It is granted after the system has been assessed and authorized, indicating that the system can operate with the accepted level of risk.

Outlines
00:00
πŸŽ₯ Introduction to NIST RMF

Gerald Dozier kicks off the video by introducing himself and the topic: the NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF). He mentions that the RMF is a GRC function used by federal IT systems and is a structured approach to implementing information security. Despite his personal preference for the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, he acknowledges the RMF's importance, especially in the US government. The video is interactive, with Gerald engaging with the audience through a chat feature, which he initially struggles with but eventually resolves. He also provides a resource by Aaron Lang for further understanding.

05:02
πŸ” Understanding NIST RMF's Six Steps

Gerald delves into the specifics of the NIST RMF, explaining that it is a six-step process designed to establish proper controls on federal IT systems. He outlines the steps: system categorization, control selection, implementation of controls, control assessment, authorization, and monitoring. He emphasizes the complexity of step three (implementing controls) and the importance of step four (assessing controls), which is typically conducted by an independent auditor. Gerald also discusses the challenges of categorizing systems and the tendency for most systems to be categorized as moderate due to the high costs and efforts associated with high-level security controls.

10:04
πŸ“š Navigating NIST 800-53 and Tailoring Controls

The discussion shifts to NIST 800-53, a document that provides a comprehensive list of security controls. Gerald explains how to use this document for tailoring controls based on the system's categorization. He highlights the importance of selecting the 'high water mark' when determining the security control baseline. Tailoring controls is presented as an advanced step that allows for the addition or removal of controls based on specific organizational needs. Gerald also shares his experience with the document's complexity and how it has evolved over time.

15:06
πŸ—οΈ Building the System Security Plan (SSP)

Gerald focuses on the creation of the System Security Plan (SSP), a critical document in the RMF process. He explains that the SSP is a living document that details how security controls are implemented and managed. The process involves defining policies, procedures, and assigning responsibilities for various controls. Gerald emphasizes the importance of documenting changes and keeping the SSP updated. He also discusses the challenges of getting approval for the SSP and the reality of implementing controls in parallel with creating the SSP.

20:08
πŸ”Ž Conducting Control Assessments

This section covers the process of assessing security controls, which is a crucial step in the RMF. Gerald explains the pre-assessment, assessment, and post-assessment phases. He stresses the importance of planning, executing, and reporting on the findings of the assessment. Gerald also provides tips on how to effectively communicate with stakeholders and gather necessary information during the assessment process.

25:10
🏒 Authorization and Ongoing Monitoring

Gerald discusses the authorization process, where an authorized official reviews the assessment results and decides whether to accept the risks associated with any controls that are not fully implemented. He mentions the creation of a Plan of Action and Milestones (POAM) to address these risks. Gerald also touches on the ongoing monitoring of controls, emphasizing the need for regular updates and reassessments to ensure continuous compliance and security.

30:13
πŸ“ˆ System Disposal and Repeating the Process

The final part of the RMF process involves system disposal and the repetition of the RMF steps as necessary. Gerald explains that when a system is no longer needed, it should be disposed of properly according to formal procedures. He also notes that the RMF is not a one-time process but should be repeated periodically to ensure that the system remains secure and compliant as its purpose and the environment change over time.

35:13
🌐 Conclusion and Future Engagement

Gerald concludes the video by summarizing the key points of the NIST RMF and expressing his personal views on the framework's effectiveness compared to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework. He invites viewers to join future discussions and briefings, highlighting the importance of continuous learning and adaptation in the field of cybersecurity.

Mindmap
Keywords
πŸ’‘NIST RMF
The NIST Risk Management Framework (NIST RMF) is a systematic approach to managing cybersecurity risks in federal information systems. It is central to the video's theme, as the speaker, Gerald Dozier, discusses its application and critique. The script mentions it as a 'dinosaur' compared to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, indicating the speaker's view that it's less evolved.
πŸ’‘GRC
GRC stands for Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance, which is a key function within organizations to ensure they operate lawfully and ethically. In the video, the NIST RMF is described as a GRC function, emphasizing its role in structuring information security programs in federal IT systems.
πŸ’‘Information System Categorization
Information System Categorization is the process of determining the level of security controls required for a system based on the sensitivity of the data it handles. The script describes this as the first step in the NIST RMF, with the speaker noting that most systems are categorized as 'moderate' due to the balance between security needs and implementation costs.
πŸ’‘Controls
In the context of the NIST RMF, controls are the security measures put in place to protect an information system. The script discusses selecting, implementing, and assessing controls as part of the RMF process, highlighting the importance of tailoring controls to fit the specific needs of an organization.
πŸ’‘Tailoring
Tailoring in the NIST RMF refers to the customization of security controls to suit the unique needs of an organization. The speaker mentions tailoring as a way to either add more controls or remove unnecessary ones, based on the specific risks and operational context of the system.
πŸ’‘System Security Plan (SSP)
An SSP is a document that outlines how security controls are implemented within an information system. The script emphasizes the importance of the SSP in the RMF process, serving as a detailed guide for auditors and a record of an organization's security posture.
πŸ’‘Independent Audit
An independent audit in the context of the NIST RMF is an assessment conducted by a third party to verify the effectiveness of the implemented controls. The script describes this as a critical step in the RMF, typically carried out by auditors who are external to the system being audited.
πŸ’‘Authorization
Authorization in the RMF process refers to the formal approval given by an executive or official to operate the system based on the security controls in place. The script mentions the creation of an authorization package, which includes the assessment results and a risk assessment, as part of this step.
πŸ’‘ATO
ATO stands for Authority to Operate, which is the formal designation given to a system that has been deemed secure and compliant with the necessary security controls. The script discusses the ATO as the culmination of the RMF process, signifying that the system is ready for operation.
πŸ’‘Continuous Monitoring
Continuous Monitoring is the ongoing process of assessing the security controls of an information system to ensure they remain effective over time. The script positions continuous monitoring as a key part of the RMF's final step, emphasizing the need for regular risk assessments and updates to the system's security posture.
πŸ’‘FedRAMP
FedRAMP is the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program, which provides a standardized approach to security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud products and services used by the government. The script briefly mentions FedRAMP in the context of cloud system compliance, indicating its relevance to the broader discussion on risk management.
Highlights

Introduction to the NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF) as a GRC function used by federal IT systems.

Gerald Dozier's personal opinion that NIST RMF is outdated compared to the NIST Cyber Security Framework.

Explanation of the six-step process of NIST RMF for implementing structured information security.

Discussion on the importance of system categorization and its impact on the level of security controls required.

Insight into the tendency of systems being categorized as 'moderate' due to the balance between security needs and implementation costs.

Overview of control selection from NIST 800-53 based on the system categorization.

Introduction to the concept of tailoring controls to better fit organizational needs.

The intensive work involved in implementing controls and configuring systems.

Role of independent auditors in assessing the effectiveness of controls in place.

Process of authorizing information systems for operation based on assessment results.

Importance of monitoring controls and maintaining security through regular audits and updates.

Discussion on the challenges of implementing RMF in dynamic environments and the need for adaptability.

The significance of the System Security Plan (SSP) in documenting control implementation.

Real-world application of RMF in government systems and the practical considerations of its implementation.

Critique of the RMF process, suggesting the need for a more streamlined and agile approach.

Comparison between NIST RMF and other frameworks like ISO 27000 for control selection.

Final thoughts on the RMF process, emphasizing the need for continuous improvement and adaptation.

Transcripts
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Thanks for rating: