How to Make a Claim
TLDRThe video script outlines a structured approach to answering scientific questions using the CER method: Claim, Evidence, and Reasoning. It emphasizes the importance of an objective claim supported by relevant evidence and a logical reasoning process that connects the two. The script suggests examining all observations, including those that may not support the initial claim, to ensure a fair and accurate scientific explanation. It also highlights the iterative nature of building scientific explanations and the value of discussing with peers to refine one's argument.
Takeaways
- 🔬 The CER approach stands for Claim, Evidence, and Reasoning, which is a helpful method to answer scientific questions.
- 📝 A claim is a single sentence that answers the scientific question and should be based on objective facts, not just a hunch or guess.
- 🔍 Evidence comes from observations and relevant information collected, which supports the claim.
- 🤔 Reasoning is the process of explaining how and why the evidence supports the claim, involving scientific concepts and definitions.
- 📚 All together, claim, evidence, and reasoning form a scientific explanation, which is a logical and convincing argument.
- 🧐 Start with the claim by examining observations and identifying patterns that suggest possible answers to the question.
- 🔑 Observations that support the claim become the evidence, while those that don't should also be considered to ensure objectivity.
- 💡 Building an explanation requires critical thinking to justify how evidence connects to the claim, using scientific reasoning.
- 🗣️ Discussing the explanation with others can help refine the argument and identify any gaps or areas that need revision.
- 🔄 Revising the explanation based on feedback is a normal part of the scientific process, even for professionals.
- 🌟 The goal is to create a clear, logical, and convincing argument that makes sense of a phenomenon through the CER method.
Q & A
What is the CER approach mentioned in the script?
-The CER approach stands for Claim, Evidence, and Reasoning. It is a method to answer a scientific question by formulating a claim, backing it up with evidence, and then using reasoning to explain how the evidence supports the claim.
What is the purpose of a claim in the CER approach?
-A claim is a single sentence that answers the guiding scientific question. It should be objective and based on observations rather than a hunch or random guess.
How does one gather evidence in the CER approach?
-Evidence comes from observations and relevant information collected during scientific inquiry. It is used to support the claim and should include all observations, even those that do not support the claim.
What role does reasoning play in the CER approach?
-Reasoning is the process of connecting the evidence to the claim. It involves describing how and why the evidence supports the claim, including the use of scientific concepts and definitions.
How can one arrive at a claim in the CER approach?
-To arrive at a claim, one should examine observations made and look for patterns that suggest a possible answer to the question. This process helps in formulating an objective claim.
Why is it important to consider observations that do not support the claim?
-Considering all observations, including those that do not support the claim, ensures a fair and comprehensive analysis. It may lead to revising the claim if necessary, which is an essential part of the scientific process.
How does one build an explanation using the CER approach?
-Building an explanation involves justifying how the evidence connects to the claim through reasoning. This includes laying out scientific concepts and definitions that piece together the claim from the evidence.
What is the significance of a scientific explanation in the CER approach?
-A scientific explanation in the CER approach is a logical and convincing argument that makes sense of a phenomenon. It allows others to follow the logic of the explanation or argument.
Why might one talk through their explanation with a friend?
-Talking through the explanation with a friend can help identify if the explanation makes sense. Friends may also challenge the explanation with new evidence or ideas, prompting revisions and improvements.
What does the script suggest about the process of building scientific explanations?
-The script suggests that building scientific explanations is a process that even professionals engage in. It involves piecing together claims, evidence, and reasoning, and may require revisions based on feedback or new information.
How can one ensure their scientific explanation is logical and convincing?
-Ensuring a logical and convincing explanation involves a clear claim, strong evidence, and sound reasoning. It also requires openness to feedback and willingness to revise based on new insights or evidence.
Outlines
🔬 Scientific Inquiry Process
This paragraph introduces the CER (Claim, Evidence, Reasoning) method for answering scientific questions. The claim is a concise statement that addresses the guiding question, supported by evidence derived from observations and data. Reasoning involves explaining how the evidence supports the claim, incorporating relevant scientific concepts and definitions. The paragraph emphasizes the importance of objectivity and thorough examination of all observations, even those that do not initially support the claim. It also suggests discussing the explanation with others to refine and validate the reasoning.
🤔 Formulating a Scientific Claim
This section delves into the process of developing a scientific claim. It advises examining observations carefully to identify patterns or connections that might suggest a potential answer. Once a claim is formulated, the focus shifts to identifying observations that strongly support this claim, serving as the evidence. The paragraph also encourages considering observations that contradict the claim and revising the claim if necessary, highlighting the iterative nature of scientific inquiry.
📚 Building a Scientific Explanation
This paragraph discusses the construction of a scientific explanation using the CER method. It emphasizes the importance of reasoning, which involves justifying how the evidence connects to the claim by outlining scientific concepts and definitions. The explanation should be logical and convincing, making sense of the phenomenon under study. The paragraph suggests that discussing the explanation with others can help identify any flaws or gaps and refine the reasoning, illustrating the collaborative aspect of scientific exploration.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Claim
💡Evidence
💡Reasoning
💡Scientific Question
💡Observations
💡Scientific Concepts
💡Definitions
💡Phenomenon
💡Argument
💡Revision
💡Nervous System
Highlights
A helpful approach to answering a scientific question is the CER method: Claim, Evidence, and Reasoning.
A claim is a single sentence that answers the scientific question but must be supported by evidence, not just a hunch or guess.
Evidence comes from observations and relevant information collected.
Reasoning is the connection between evidence and claim, including scientific concepts and definitions.
Together, claim, evidence, and reasoning form a scientific explanation, a logical and convincing argument.
Focus on individual parts of the CER method to avoid feeling overwhelmed.
Start with the claim, which should be an objective answer to the guiding question based on observations.
Examine observations to suggest possible answers and identify patterns that point to a certain answer.
Observations that support the claim become the evidence.
Consider all observations, even those that do not support the claim, and revise the claim if necessary.
Building an explanation requires justifying how evidence connects to the claim through reasoning.
Reasoning should include all scientific concepts and definitions that support the claim from the evidence.
Discussing the explanation with a friend can help refine the argument and identify any gaps.
Challenging the explanation with new evidence or ideas is part of the scientific process.
Revising the explanation based on feedback is acceptable and part of building scientific explanations.
The process of building scientific explanations is iterative, even for professionals.
Transcripts
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Thanks for rating: