The Perfect Score: Cheating on the SAT
TLDRIn a shocking case of academic fraud, 19-year-old Sam Eago was arrested for taking the SAT and ACT tests for other students, earning thousands of dollars in the process. His actions raised questions about the security and integrity of these crucial exams. Despite being a top student and varsity athlete, Eago exploited the system for personal gain, highlighting the alarming ease with which standardized tests can be cheated. His story, which includes a detailed account of how he operated and the implications for the education system, serves as a stark reminder of the need for reform in test security measures.
Takeaways
- π° Sam Eago, a 19-year-old college student, made national news for being arrested and charged with fraud and criminal impersonation for taking the SAT and ACT tests for others.
- π‘ Eago's ability to ace standardized tests led him to a double life as an 'academic gun for hire,' where he was paid thousands of dollars to take exams for other students.
- π΅οΈββοΈ The district attorney who charged Eago emphasized the high stakes and large sums of money involved, as well as the forgery and criminal impersonation aspects of the fraud.
- π Eago was able to take the SAT at least 16 times, raising questions about the integrity and security of one of the most important tests taken by millions of high school students.
- π€ Eago's story reveals the shocking ease with which the system can be cheated, with no significant security measures in place to prevent criminal impersonation during SAT testing.
- π Despite being a top student and varsity athlete, Eago's talent for acing standardized tests was his downfall and led him into a life of crime.
- πΈ Eago's clients were based on word of mouth and a referral system, and he was able to command high fees for his services, even inducing bidding wars between them.
- π Eago's business was lucrative, allowing him to charge up to $2500 per test and even add airfare costs when flying home to take exams.
- π The investigation into Eago's actions has uncovered a systemic problem, with over 50 students implicated in cheating operations across four New York counties.
- π The Educational Testing Service (ETS) and the College Board, while stating that the majority of students take the SAT honestly, acknowledge the need for improved security and integrity in the testing process.
- π As a result of his plea deal, Eago is required to perform community service tutoring low-income students on how to take the SAT, highlighting the complex moral and ethical dimensions of his actions.
Q & A
Who is the main subject of the transcript?
-The main subject of the transcript is Sam Eago, a 19-year-old college student who was arrested and charged with fraud and criminal impersonation for taking SAT and ACT tests for other people.
What was Sam Eago's motivation for becoming an academic 'gun for hire'?
-Sam Eago's motivation for becoming an academic 'gun for hire' was the perception of an easy way to make money. He realized that his talent for acing standardized tests could be monetized, and students were willing to pay him thousands of dollars to take the exams on their behalf.
How did Sam Eago manage to impersonate other students and take the SAT for them?
-Sam Eago managed to impersonate other students by creating fake high school IDs using a template from his own school ID. He would then place his picture on the ID along with the name and date of birth of the student whose test he was taking, and use this as one of the six acceptable forms of identification at SAT testing centers.
What was the reaction of the educational testing service (ETS) to Sam Eago's actions?
-The ETS expressed concern over the integrity and validity of the SAT scores due to Sam Eago's actions. They acknowledged that while the majority of students take the test honestly, the security vulnerabilities exposed by Eago's case indicate a need for systemic changes to prevent such impersonations in the future.
How did the district attorney, Kathleen Rice, describe the fraud committed by Sam Eago and the students who hired him?
-District Attorney Kathleen Rice described the fraud as a huge scheme involving lots of money, high stakes, forgery, and criminal impersonation. She emphasized that it was a fraud on many different levels, most importantly against the kids who play by the rules.
What were the consequences for Sam Eago after his arrest?
-After his arrest, Sam Eago accepted a plea deal which included community service. Specifically, he was required to tutor low-income students on how to take the SAT, reflecting a form of restorative justice for his actions.
How did the colleges of the students who cheated react to the situation?
-The colleges of the students who cheated were not notified about theδ½εΌ cases, as it is ETS policy not to inform schools about suspected or confirmed cheating cases. Therefore, some students who got into college through fraudulent means may not face any repercussions.
What was the extent of Sam Eago's involvement in test-taking for others?
-Sam Eago took the SAT at least 16 times for other students. He was able to maintain a high level of performance, consistently scoring in the 97th percentile or higher for his clients.
How did Sam Eago's clients find out about his services?
-Sam Eago's clients found out about his services through word of mouth and a referral system. His success in taking the tests for others led to a stellar reputation among students at his high school and beyond.
What was the role of the so-called 'middlemen' in the cheating operations?
-The 'middlemen' acted as brokers who matched buyers (students willing to pay for someone to take the test for them) with sellers (test takers like Sam Eago). They facilitated the transactions based on the students' ability to pay and the test takers' ability to score.
What security measures were in place at SAT testing centers, according to the transcript?
-According to the transcript, the security measures at SAT testing centers were minimal and ineffective. Test takers were required to show an ID with their picture, name, and date of birth, which could easily be faked. The proctors, often junior faculty members or staff, were not equipped to effectively verify the identity of test takers.
How did Sam Eago feel about the impact of his actions on other students?
-Sam Eago acknowledged that his actions were wrong but did not feel particularly guilty about the impact on other students. He believed that the students he helped were not displacing anyone and that their admission to schools did not significantly affect others.
Outlines
π The SAT Impersonation Scandal
This paragraph introduces the case of Sam Eago, a 19-year-old college student who made national news for his involvement in a large-scale SAT and ACT test-taking fraud. Eago's talent for acing standardized tests led him to a lucrative but illegal side business, where he charged students thousands of dollars to take these exams on their behalf. The district attorney's investigation revealed that Eago took the SAT at least 16 times, raising serious concerns about the integrity and security of these crucial tests for high school students. Eago's story is used to highlight the ease with which the system can be manipulated and the significant implications for educational fairness.
π° The Business of Test-Taking
In this paragraph, Eago discusses the financial aspects of his illicit test-taking enterprise. He operated on a referral system, building a clientele based on word of mouth. Eago's high scores and the clients' willingness to pay allowed him to charge up to $2500 per test, with one client even giving him an $1100 tip. He also exploited the system by adding travel costs to his fee when taking tests out of town. The paragraph raises questions about where the students got the money to pay Eago, suggesting that it might have come from their parents. Eago's business model and the demand for his services highlight the pressure and desperation some students feel to achieve high test scores, regardless of the means.
π¨ The Fallout and Systemic Issue
The final paragraph delves into the aftermath of Eago's arrest and the broader implications for the SAT's integrity. The investigation expanded to include over 50 students involved in similar cheating operations across New York. It reveals a sophisticated system where brokers matched students willing to pay with those capable of delivering high scores. The paragraph discusses the policy of not notifying colleges about confirmed cheating cases, meaning that students who gained admission through fraud may never be discovered. The narrative calls for a change in the system, emphasizing the need for improved security measures to prevent such incidents and maintain the validity of SAT scores.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘SAT and ACT tests
π‘Fraud and Criminal Impersonation
π‘Academic Gun for Hire
π‘Integrity and Security
π‘Proctors
π‘Test Accommodations
π‘Plea Deal
π‘Cheating the System
π‘College Admissions
π‘Test-Taking Services
π‘Systemic Problem
Highlights
19-year-old college student Sam Eagofff made national news after being arrested for taking SAT and ACT tests for others, charging thousands of dollars.
Sam Eagofff was able to take the SATs at least 16 times, raising questions about the integrity and security of one of the most important tests for high school students.
Eagofff's initial motivation was to find an easy way to make money, which ultimately led to his arrest.
Eagofff was perceived as a perfect kid, a top student, vice president of the business club, and a varsity athlete at his high school.
Eagofff began his double life as an 'academic gun for hire' due to his talent for acing standardized tests.
Nassau County District Attorney Kathleen Rice filed criminal charges against Eagofff and the students who hired him, highlighting the high stakes and forgery involved.
The investigation revealed the SAT's security vulnerabilities, with no measures in place to prevent criminal impersonation.
Eagofff's method involved creating a fake high school ID, one of six forms of identification accepted at SAT testing centers.
Eagofff's first experience taking a test for someone else resulted in a perfect score in the math section, marking the beginning of his lucrative career.
Eagofff consistently scored in the 97th percentile or higher for his clients over nearly three years.
Eagofff's clients were based on word of mouth and a referral system, ensuring a good track record for his 'service'.
At the height of his business, Eagofff could charge up to $2500 per test and even induced bidding wars between clients.
Eagofff exploited accommodations provided by the Educational Testing Service to make the SAT accessible to everyone, including using high school IDs as acceptable forms of identification.
The security process for taking the SAT was described as lacking, with no significant checks or balances in place.
ETS President Kurt Langra acknowledged that impersonations do occur but emphasized that the vast majority of students take the SAT honestly.
Sam Eagofff accepted a plea deal including community service, tutoring low-income students on how to take the SAT.
Eagofff expressed remorse and stated he would never have engaged in the cheating if he could start over.
The colleges of the students Eagofff helped are not notified about the cheating, meaning there are students in college right now who got there due to someone else taking their tests.
The case highlights the need for systemic change in the security and integrity of standardized testing.
Transcripts
Browse More Related Video
Class 11th Barbaad !! Fir Bhi Bana NEET 2023 TOPPER π«‘ AIR 59 - Vaibhav || Scored 710 Marks β‘
Why Are Asian Youths More Academically Advanced? | School Swap: Korea Style | Real Families
Americaβs mass shooting problem, explained
A predator in the classroom: The Brittany Zamora story from 12 News
The Internet: Cybersecurity & Crime
Court Cam: Top 5 Sovereign Citizen Moments | A&E
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Thanks for rating: