Everyday Evidence - How Impeachment Works
TLDRThe transcript discusses the strategic use of impeachment during cross-examination in legal proceedings. It highlights the importance of assessing when to impeach a witness's credibility, the methods available for impeachment, including prior acts of dishonesty, convictions, inconsistent statements, and bias. The speaker emphasizes the need for careful decision-making, ensuring that impeachment efforts are both relevant and effective, and stresses the importance of adhering to cross-examination techniques to make impeachments impactful.
Takeaways
- 📚 Impeachment is a part of cross-examination, used to challenge the credibility of a witness.
- 🤔 Before impeaching, consider if the witness has provided helpful information and whether impeaching will benefit the case.
- 🔍 Choose the method of impeachment carefully, as it can either completely discredit a witness or only undermine part of their credibility.
- 👀 Assess the witness's bias and motive to lie, which can be effective forms of impeachment.
- 👥 Consider whether impeaching the witness will enhance the credibility of the lawyer in the eyes of the jury.
- 🚫 Ensure that the lawyer has the capacity to impeach before proceeding with cross-examination.
- 📖 Understand the rules of evidence and case law that govern the various methods of impeachment.
- 👮♂️ Prior acts of dishonesty, such as convictions for fraudulent crimes, can be used for character impeachment.
- 🗣️ Prior inconsistent statements can be used to impeach a witness, but the method of introduction must be carefully managed.
- 🔑 Bias and motive to lie are admissible to show the witness's partiality and can be powerful tools in impeachment.
- 🔍 Impeachment by contradiction allows confronting a witness with a change in their statement on a non-collateral matter.
- 🔄 Maintain cross-examination skills while impeaching, ensuring a clear strategy and understanding of the process.
Q & A
What is the primary purpose of impeachment in cross-examination?
-The primary purpose of impeachment in cross-examination is to challenge the credibility of a witness, by introducing new facts, highlighting inconsistencies, or attacking the witness's character.
When should you consider impeaching a witness during cross-examination?
-You should consider impeaching a witness when the witness has provided information that is inconsistent with previously admitted facts, or when their testimony could potentially be biased or dishonest.
What factors should you consider before deciding to impeach a witness?
-Factors to consider include whether the witness has provided sufficient supportive information for your case, the method of impeachment available, the potential impact on your own credibility, and the importance of the impeachment relative to the case.
How does bias and motive to lie serve as a basis for impeachment?
-Bias and motive to lie can serve as a basis for impeachment by showing that the witness has a predisposition for or against one of the parties, which may have influenced their testimony and affected their impartiality.
What is the difference between impeachment by prior inconsistent statement and impeachment by contradiction?
-Impeachment by prior inconsistent statement involves showing that the witness has changed their story from a previous statement, admitted for the purpose of showing inconsistency. Impeachment by contradiction involves confronting the witness with a change in their statement on a collateral matter, which is admissible as substantive evidence.
How can a prior conviction be used for impeachment purposes?
-A prior conviction can be used for impeachment if it is a felony committed within the last ten years, or if it is a crime of dishonesty or fraud, regardless of the time since the conviction. These convictions are considered highly relevant to the witness's credibility.
What is the role of prior acts of truthfulness in impeachment?
-Prior acts of truthfulness can be used to impeach a witness's credibility by suggesting that because they have been untruthful in the past, they cannot be trusted in their current testimony.
How does the concept of 'surgical strike' relate to impeachment?
-A 'surgical strike' in the context of impeachment refers to a targeted approach that aims to undermine only a part of the witness's credibility, rather than attempting to completely destroy it.
What is the importance of the jury's perception when deciding to impeach a witness?
-The jury's perception is crucial because if the impeachment is seen as a trick or if the witness is perceived as inherently truthful, the jury may have a hard time accepting the impeachment, which could backfire on the attorney.
What are the rules of evidence and case law regarding impeachment?
-The rules of evidence and case law provide specific ways to impeach a witness, such as through prior convictions, inconsistent statements, bias, prejudice, or motive to lie. These rules also dictate the admissibility of such evidence in court.
How can impeachment by omission be used in cross-examination?
-Impeachment by omission occurs when a witness should have mentioned something previously but did not, and it is now being brought up for the first time in court. This can be used to question the witness's thoroughness and credibility.
Outlines
📚 Understanding Impeachment in Cross-Examination
This paragraph discusses the role and strategy of impeachment during cross-examination in legal proceedings. Impeachment is depicted as a method to challenge the credibility of a witness, either by introducing new facts or highlighting inconsistencies. The speaker advises on when to impeach, considering whether the witness's testimony aids the case or if the impeachment method might be too aggressive. The paragraph also explores different types of impeachment, such as bias, motive to lie, prior convictions, and prior inconsistent statements. The speaker emphasizes the importance of knowing the rules of evidence and case law to effectively impeach a witness.
🔍 Techniques and Considerations in Witness Impeachment
This paragraph delves deeper into the specifics of impeaching a witness, focusing on the types of prior convictions that can be used for impeachment and the conditions under which they are admissible. It explains the distinction between felony convictions and crimes of fraudulent behavior, and how these can be used to challenge a witness's credibility. The speaker also discusses the use of prior inconsistent statements under Rule of Evidence 613, detailing the process of committing and confronting a witness with their previous statements. Additionally, the paragraph covers impeachment by contradiction and bias, highlighting how these can be used to show a witness's partiality or prejudice. The speaker concludes by reminding practitioners to maintain their cross-examination skills and to carefully consider the method and timing of impeachment.
🏁 Conclusion on the Purpose of Impeachment
In this brief concluding paragraph, the speaker reiterates the purpose of impeachment in legal proceedings. It serves as a reminder that impeachment is a strategic tool used to challenge the credibility of a witness, ensuring that the jury's perception of the witness is influenced by the evidence presented. The paragraph succinctly wraps up the discussion on impeachment, emphasizing its significance in the legal process.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Impeachment
💡Cross-examination
💡Credibility
💡Bias
💡Motive to Lie
💡Prior Convictions
💡Prior Inconsistent Statements
💡Impeachment by Contradiction
💡Rules of Evidence
💡Non-Collateral Matters
💡Impeachment by Omission
Highlights
Impeachment is a part of cross-examination, focusing on introducing new facts or attacking the credibility of a witness.
Deciding when to impeach involves assessing whether the witness's testimony has helped your case and considering the impact on their credibility.
The method of impeachment chosen can vary from a complete destruction of credibility to a more targeted approach.
Bias and motive to lie are types of impeachment that can be focused on a party, whereas convictions for fraudulent crimes can affect the witness's entire character.
Impeachment can also be used to enhance the credibility of the lawyer in the eyes of the jury.
The ability to impeach depends on having the capacity to accomplish the goal, which must be assessed before proceeding.
The jury's perception of the impeachment strategy is crucial, as it can be seen as a trick or a necessary step in the cross-examination.
Rules of evidence and case law provide various ways to impeach, such as prior acts for truthfulness, prior convictions, and prior inconsistent statements.
Prior art relax is a character impeachment that relies on the witness's past untruthfulness to cast doubt on their current testimony.
Admitting prior untruthful acts as evidence requires careful consideration of the judge's view of collateral matters.
Prior convictions for felonies or crimes of fraudulent behavior within the last ten years are admissible for impeachment purposes in many jurisdictions.
Impeachment with a prior inconsistent statement involves confronting the witness with a previous statement that contradicts their current testimony.
The nature of the earlier statement is crucial in impeachment by prior inconsistent statement, as it determines the admissibility of the evidence.
Impeachment by contradiction allows the lawyer to confront the witness with a change in their statement on a non-collateral matter.
Bias and motive to lie are admissible to show the witness's partiality or impartiality, which can influence the credibility of their testimony.
Impeachment strategies should be integrated with cross-examination skills, ensuring a coherent and effective approach to questioning.
Understanding the method and purpose of impeachment is essential for making it a meaningful part of the cross-examination.
Transcripts
Browse More Related Video
Impeachment of a Witness (FRE 607-609, 611, 613) [LEAP Preview — Evidence: 6/14]
SIMPLIFIED – Character Evidence
A Guide to Hearsay Evidence (Meaning, Definition, Exceptions)
004 Presentation of Evidence (Rule 132) | Rules on Evidence | by Dean Riano
Cross Examination - Strategies, tactics, & tips on how to effectively cross-examine a witness.
How to Analyze Hearsay on an Evidence Essay (Pt. 1): What is Hearsay? (FRE 801(c))
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Thanks for rating: