The Internet is Worse Than Ever – Now What?
TLDRThis video explores the myth of online filter bubbles and how social media actually exacerbates polarization by sorting people into teams based on worldviews. It suggests that smaller online communities might be a better model for fostering understanding and empathy.
Takeaways
- 🌐 Social media is often blamed for increasing polarization and political violence, but the reality might be more complex than just filter bubbles.
- 🔍 The idea of online filter bubbles, where algorithms only show content that aligns with your views, is largely a myth. People are exposed to diverse opinions online more than in real life.
- 🧠 Human brains evolved to navigate social structures, not to understand the full nature of reality. This evolution focused on cooperation and survival within tribes.
- 🏘️ Real-life interactions are often more ideologically homogeneous than online interactions, making the 'filter bubble' more of a real-world phenomenon.
- 🤔 The internet, particularly social media, challenges our brains by exposing us to a vast amount of disagreement, which can lead to social sorting and polarization.
- 🏙️ The digital 'town square' lacks the local social glue that helps us align with diverse views in real life, making disagreements more extreme online.
- 😡 Anger is a highly engaging emotion on social media, which leads platforms to amplify extreme and controversial opinions, further polarizing users.
- 🌐 Online polarization simplifies complex societal issues, making it seem as if those with opposing views are intentionally harming society, rather than merely having different perspectives.
- 🤝 The social glue that holds societies together is being eroded by online polarization, which is particularly problematic in countries like the US with a two-party system.
- 💡 To mitigate these effects, individuals can self-examine their beliefs and biases, and consider returning to smaller online communities that mirror real-life social structures.
- 🌐 Ground News, a sponsor of the video, aims to increase media literacy by providing tools to critically assess information and understand different perspectives.
Q & A
What is the main concern expressed in the script about the current state of society?
-The script expresses concern about the increasing polarization and potential for civil war, with people seeing themselves as part of opposing teams and justifying political violence.
Why is social media often blamed for societal divisions?
-Social media is blamed for dividing people, making them more extreme and less empathetic, and for promoting stress and depression through mechanisms like filter bubbles and doom scrolling.
What is the myth of the filter bubble, and what does the script suggest about its prevalence?
-The myth of the filter bubble suggests that algorithms show users only content that aligns with their existing views, isolating them ideologically. However, the script suggests that extreme filter bubbles are rare, and online interactions are often more diverse than real-life ones.
How does the script challenge the idea that the internet should make us more empathetic?
-The script challenges this idea by explaining that our brains have not evolved to process the amount of disagreement encountered on social media, leading to social sorting rather than increased empathy.
What is 'social sorting' as described in the script?
-Social sorting is a process where our brains categorize people based on their world views and opinions into teams, making it less likely that we consider their positions or opinions in the future.
How does the script explain the impact of the social internet on our brains' social structures?
-The script explains that the social internet overwhelms our brains with disagreement, derailing the mechanisms that once facilitated cooperation and social cohesion among our ancestors.
What role does anger play in the engagement-driven social internet according to the script?
-Anger is identified as a highly engaging emotion that prompts sharing and further engagement on social media, leading to the amplification of extreme and controversial opinions.
How does the script describe the effect of online polarization on individual aspects of life?
-The script describes how online polarization condenses individual aspects of life, such as lifestyle choices and personal interests, into opposing and mutually exclusive identities, simplifying and distorting disagreements.
What is the script's suggestion for a potential solution to reduce social sorting online?
-The script suggests returning to smaller online communities, similar to pre-social media internet forums and blogs, which were more fractured and less overwhelming to our brains.
How does the script describe the role of news organizations in contributing to team-based thinking?
-The script describes how most news organizations cater to one team, reinforcing the idea that one is on the correct side and contributing to the dissolution of social glue necessary for democracies.
What is the script's recommendation for consuming news to counteract biases and improve media literacy?
-The script recommends using tools like Ground News, which provides context about news sources, their political bias, reliability, and ownership, to help consumers think critically about the information they consume.
Outlines
🌐 Social Media's Role in Division and Misinterpretation
In 2022, nearly half of Americans anticipated a civil war, with one in five justifying political violence. Globally, people increasingly see themselves as part of opposing teams. Social media is often blamed for this division, making us more extreme and less empathetic, leading to stress and depression. However, new research suggests we may have misunderstood the effects of social media on our brains. Contrary to popular belief, studies show that extreme filter bubbles are rare, and people are not ideologically isolated online but are instead exposed to diverse opinions. The real ideological isolation occurs in real-life interactions with friends and family.
🧠 The Limitations of Our Brains in the Digital Age
Human brains evolved to maintain social structures for survival, not to understand the true nature of reality. In small tribes, physical proximity created familiarity and similarities, bridging gaps in worldviews. As societies evolved into towns, cities, and nations, brains adapted to more diverse neighbors. Conflict and disagreement can drive societal evolution, but we also need social glue to hold societies together. The advent of the social media internet disrupted this balance, overwhelming our brains with disagreements and derailing cooperation mechanisms. This has led to social sorting, where brains categorize people into teams based on worldviews, exacerbating division.
🤖 Social Media Amplifies Division and Anger
Our brains sort people by worldviews, making disagreement a central part of others' identities, leading to uncritical belief or dismissal of information based on alignment. Social media amplifies this by prioritizing engagement through anger, showing the worst disagreements possible and assigning extreme opinions to opposing teams. This leads to a simplified and distorted view of disagreements, making opposing views seem almost evil. In the US, the two-party system exacerbates this polarization. To mitigate this, individuals need to be aware of social media's effects on their brains, critically examine their beliefs, and adapt to the information age.
🌍 Returning to Smaller Online Communities
The old internet, with bulletin boards, forums, and blogs, was more fractured and community-oriented, resembling real-life interactions. These small communities had distinct cultures and rules, reducing the overwhelming disagreements seen in the digital town square of social media. Returning to smaller online communities may reduce social sorting and polarization. Despite our brains' limitations, we must remember that we are all on the same team, humanity. Tools like Ground News can help by providing diverse perspectives and highlighting media biases, fostering critical thinking and a more balanced understanding of the world.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Civil War
💡Political Violence
💡Social Media
💡Filter Bubble
💡Ideological Isolation
💡Social Sorting
💡Digital Town Square
💡Anger
💡Polarization
💡Social Glue
💡Small Online Communities
💡Media Literacy
Highlights
In 2022, nearly half of Americans expected a civil war in the next few years, with one in five believing political violence is justified.
The perception of increasing division is not limited to the US but is a global phenomenon.
Social media is often blamed for dividing people and making them more extreme, but new research suggests a different interpretation.
The myth of the filter bubble suggests algorithms isolate users from differing opinions, but studies show this is rare.
Online platforms actually expose users to a wider range of opinions compared to real-life interactions.
The real filter bubble exists in real life, where interactions are less diverse than online.
Human brains evolved to navigate social structures, not to understand reality, which impacts how we process online disagreement.
The social internet challenges our brains' mechanisms for cooperation and creates social sorting based on opinions.
Disagreement online is amplified due to the lack of local social glue that helps align perspectives in real life.
Social media algorithms prioritize engagement, often through anger, which exacerbates extreme opinions.
Online polarization simplifies individual aspects into opposing identities, distorting disagreements.
The perception of others as evil undermines the social glue necessary for democratic societies.
The US two-party system intensifies team thinking and negative opinions about the opposing party.
Self-examination of beliefs and critical thinking about information sources can help counteract social media's effects.
Adapting to the information age requires finding models that work with our brains' limitations.
Pre-social media internet models like bulletin boards and forums may offer a way to reduce social sorting.
Ground News provides tools for critical thinking about information by showing different media perspectives.
Transcripts
Browse More Related Video
7 Side Hustles Students Can Start In 2024
Is Social Media Hurting Your Mental Health? | Bailey Parnell | TEDxRyersonU
How social media is affecting teens
Online love & infidelity. We're in the game, what are the rules? | Michelle Drouin | TEDxNaperville
Social Influence: Crash Course Psychology #38
The Future of Ecommerce by Connie Chan
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Thanks for rating: