The Science of Bias, Empathy, and Dehumanization | Paul Bloom | Big Think

Big Think
8 Jan 201704:49
EducationalLearning
32 Likes 10 Comments

TLDRThe transcript explores the inherent biases that favor our own groups, acknowledging that some are morally acceptable like familial love, while others like racial or national biases are less so. It delves into the natural tendency to differentiate between in-group and out-group, evident even in infants. Empathy, likened to a spotlight, is highlighted as a force that, despite its positive aspects, is susceptible to bias, potentially exacerbating in-group favoritism. The speaker also discusses dehumanization and its role in cruelty, suggesting that recognizing another's humanity can fuel sadism and suffering, rather than dehumanizing them.

Takeaways
  • 🧡 Biases are a natural part of human nature, favoring our own group over others.
  • 👨‍👧‍👦 Some biases, like parental love, are considered morally respectable and not a source of embarrassment.
  • 🏙️ Less respectable biases include those based on skin color, nationality, and even sports team affiliations, which can be arbitrary.
  • 👶 In-group and out-group distinctions are innate and observable in babies before their first birthday.
  • 💡 Empathy is like a spotlight, focusing our attention and care on a limited area, making it susceptible to bias.
  • 🤔 Rational decision-making can be unbiased, but the introduction of empathy can lead to biased outcomes.
  • 🔍 Bias can be exacerbated by empathy, making in-group and out-group distinctions more pronounced and harder to overcome.
  • 🤖 Dehumanization is a factor in how we treat others poorly, viewing the out-group as less than human and deserving of moral indifference.
  • 🤔 The role of dehumanization in atrocities is complex and not solely responsible for cruelty; sometimes, recognizing humanity fuels suffering.
  • 📡 Sadism and cruelty may involve a recognition of the other person's humanity, as this recognition can drive the desire to cause suffering.
  • 📚 The speaker's views on dehumanization have evolved, influenced by the works of others who argue for its central role in evil.
Q & A

  • What are some of the biases that people naturally have according to the script?

    -The script mentions biases that favor one's own group over others, including love for one's family and loved ones, as well as biases based on skin color, national origin, and even sports teams.

  • Why does the speaker believe that loving one's own children or spouse more than others is morally respectable?

    -The speaker suggests that these biases are morally respectable because they are natural and not something to be embarrassed about, as they reflect a natural preference for those closest to us.

  • What role do biases play in our lives according to the speaker?

    -Biases play a significant role in our lives as they are deeply ingrained in our emotions and decision-making processes, influencing how we perceive and interact with the world.

  • How does the speaker describe the natural tendency of humans to differentiate between in-group and out-group?

    -The speaker describes this tendency as something that comes naturally to us, even observable in babies before their first birthday, indicating an innate human characteristic.

  • What is the analogy used by the speaker to explain the vulnerability of empathy to bias?

    -The speaker uses the analogy of a spotlight to explain empathy's vulnerability to bias. A spotlight illuminates only a small area where it is pointed, indicating that empathy can be directed and thus biased.

  • How does the speaker suggest empathy can affect decision-making when it comes to bias?

    -The speaker suggests that empathy can exaggerate in-group and out-group bias, making it difficult to override, as it brings these biases to the forefront and influences decision-making.

  • What is the speaker's view on the role of dehumanization in atrocities?

    -Initially, the speaker thought dehumanization played a significant role in atrocities, but after considering critiques and arguments by others, the speaker is less certain and suggests that it might not be the core of all evils.

  • Why does the speaker express skepticism about the importance of dehumanization in causing cruelty?

    -The speaker is skeptical because the people we torment the most are often those we acknowledge as human, and it is this recognition that fuels the desire to make them suffer, rather than a lack of recognition.

  • What example does the speaker provide to illustrate the point about dehumanization and cruelty?

    -The speaker provides the example of revenge porn, where individuals post intimate photos and videos of their ex-partners online, causing harm and suffering, which indicates a recognition of the other person's humanity rather than dehumanization.

  • How does the speaker relate the concept of sadism and cruelty to the recognition of another person's humanity?

    -The speaker suggests that sadism and cruelty involve a recognition of the other person's humanity because this recognition is what fuels the desire to cause suffering, rather than a lack of recognition.

  • What is the speaker's conclusion about the relationship between empathy and bias in decision-making?

    -The speaker concludes that while rational cost-benefit analysis can strive for fairness, empathy in decision-making is inevitably biased, and this bias can be difficult to overcome.

Outlines
00:00
👨‍👧‍👦 Biases in Favor of Our Own Group

This paragraph discusses the inherent biases humans have towards their own group over others. It acknowledges that some biases, like familial love, are morally acceptable, while others, such as those based on skin color or national origin, are less so. The speaker suggests that these biases are deeply ingrained, starting from an early age, and that empathy, often seen as a positive trait, can actually exacerbate these biases by focusing attention only on those within our 'in-group'. The paragraph also touches on the concept of dehumanization, questioning its role in atrocities and suggesting that cruelty may stem from a recognition of another's humanity rather than a denial of it.

Mindmap
Keywords
💡biases
Biases refer to the inclinations or prejudices favoring one's own group over others. In the script, the speaker acknowledges that while some biases, such as parental love, are morally acceptable, others like those based on skin color or national origin are less respectable. The theme of the video revolves around the pervasiveness of these biases in human behavior and decision-making.
💡in group and out group
The terms 'in group' and 'out group' describe the natural human tendency to categorize others based on perceived similarities or differences. The script suggests that this distinction is innate, even observable in babies, and plays a significant role in how we interact with and perceive others, which is central to the discussion of biases.
💡empathy
Empathy is the ability to understand and share the feelings of others. The speaker uses the analogy of empathy as a spotlight, highlighting its capacity to focus attention on specific individuals or groups but also emphasizing its vulnerability to bias. The video explores how empathy can be both beneficial and problematic in decision-making.
💡dehumanization
Dehumanization is the act of depriving a person or group of their humanity, viewing them as less than human. The script discusses this concept as a potential factor in atrocities, suggesting that it can lead to moral indifference. However, the speaker also expresses skepticism about its role, indicating a nuanced discussion within the video.
💡sadism
Sadism refers to the tendency to derive pleasure from inflicting pain, suffering, or humiliation on others. The script uses the example of revenge porn to illustrate how sadism can involve a recognition of the victim's humanity, as the intent is to cause suffering, not merely to dehumanize or eliminate them.
💡revenge porn
Revenge porn is the act of distributing intimate photos or videos of someone without their consent, often as an act of revenge. The script describes a chilling example of this behavior, showing how it can be a manifestation of sadism and cruelty, grounded in a recognition of the victim's humanity.
💡moral indifference
Moral indifference is the lack of concern for the moral implications of one's actions. The script suggests that dehumanization can lead to this state, where the suffering of others is ignored or dismissed, which is a key point in the exploration of how biases can affect our moral judgments.
💡rational cost benefit analysis
This concept refers to the process of making decisions based on a logical assessment of the costs and benefits involved. The speaker mentions it as a method to strive for fairness and objectivity, contrasting it with decision-making influenced by empathy and biases.
💡atrocites
Atrocities are acts of extreme wickedness, cruelty, or violence, often on a large scale. The script touches on the role of dehumanization and sadism in such acts, questioning the extent to which they are driven by a lack of recognition of the victims' humanity.
💡humanity
Humanity, in this context, refers to the qualities that define us as human beings, such as empathy, compassion, and moral awareness. The script discusses the recognition or denial of humanity in others as a factor in how we treat them, particularly in relation to cruelty and suffering.
💡spotlight analogy
The spotlight analogy is used to describe the limited scope of empathy, suggesting that it can only focus on a small area at a time and is directed by our biases. This analogy is central to the video's argument about the double-edged nature of empathy and its susceptibility to bias.
Highlights

We have various biases that favor our own group over others, with some being morally respectable like loving our family more than others.

Other biases are less respectable, such as those based on skin color, national origin, and sports teams, which can seem arbitrary but significantly impact our lives.

Humans are naturally inclined to categorize the world into in-groups and out-groups, a distinction that can be observed even in babies before their first birthday.

Bias is deeply embedded in our emotions and decision-making processes, with empathy being particularly susceptible to bias due to its spotlight-like focus on specific areas or individuals.

The spotlight analogy for empathy highlights its ability to zoom in and care deeply, but also its limitation in only illuminating a small area where the spotlight is pointed.

Attempting a rational cost-benefit analysis can be relatively unbiased, but empathy introduces bias, making it difficult to override in-group and out-group distinctions.

Dehumanization is a key factor in how we treat others poorly, viewing the out-group as things rather than people, leading to moral indifference.

Dehumanization may not necessarily motivate cruelty, but it does foster a disregard for the suffering of others.

The speaker expresses skepticism about the importance of dehumanization in atrocities, suggesting that it may not be as central as previously thought.

Critiques of dehumanization as the core of all evils point out that those we torment the most are not necessarily those we view as non-human.

The speaker argues that it may be the recognition of another's humanity, not dehumanization, that fuels cruelty and the desire to make them suffer.

An example of cruel behavior, such as revenge porn, shows that the perpetrators view their victims as human and want them to suffer for perceived moral wrongs.

Sadism and cruelty may involve recognizing the humanity of others, as this recognition can fuel the desire to inflict suffering.

If someone were to dehumanize another, they might want to eradicate or get rid of them, but not necessarily want them to suffer so much.

The transcript explores the complex relationship between empathy, bias, and the potential for cruelty, challenging some common assumptions about dehumanization and suffering.

Transcripts

Browse More Related Video

Why we stereotype others and how we can stop. | David Locher | TEDxMSSU

When Implicit Bias Becomes Explicit | Megan Fuciarelli | TEDxLivoniaCCLibrary

Ethnocentrism and cultural relativism in group and out group | MCAT | Khan Academy

12.6 Substitution Reactions of Alcohols | Organic Chemistry

Prejudice and Discrimination: Crash Course Psychology #39

Ethan Nadelmann: The War on Drugs is Racist | Big Think

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Thanks for rating:

Related Tags
Human BiasEmpathy SpotlightMoral DecisionsIn-Group FavoritismOut-Group BiasDehumanizationSadism RecognitionCruelty MotivationSocial PsychologyEthical Dilemmas