AAP Staging and Grading - Case Studies
TLDRThe video script is an educational guide on how to stage and grade periodontitis in patients. It emphasizes that staging and grading are only applicable to clients with periodontitis and bone loss. The speaker uses hypothetical examples to illustrate the process, focusing on measurements such as interdental clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), radiographic bone loss, tooth loss due to periodontitis, and other local factors like smoking and diabetes. The American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) guidelines are referenced for staging and grading criteria. The script outlines how to determine the worst-case scenario for staging and the most severe condition for grading, considering factors like bone loss over five years and smoking habits. It concludes with the importance of selecting the worst stage and grade to accurately assess the patient's condition, with tips on defaulting to grade B unless evidence suggests otherwise.
Takeaways
- 🦷 **Staging and Grading Criteria**: The process involves assessing clients with periodontitis and bone loss, focusing on the highest CAL (Clinical Attachment Level) and probing depth.
- 🔍 **Highest CAL and Probing Depth**: Identify the worst reading in the mouth, which determines the staging; the highest CAL in the example was four millimeters.
- 📏 **Radiographic Bone Loss (LBL)**: Assess the extent of bone loss radiographically, identifying if it's in the middle or coronal third of the root, which aids in staging.
- 🚫 **Tooth Loss**: Note tooth loss specifically due to periodontitis, not other causes like cavities, as it affects grading.
- 🚬 **Lifestyle Factors**: Consider patient habits like smoking, which can influence the grade, with smoking a pack a day pushing the grade to C.
- 📊 **Calculating Bone Loss Percentage**: Use the formula of highest bone loss percentage divided by the patient's age to determine the radiographic bone level.
- 🔢 **Staging Process**: The worst stage from the assessment, in this case, stage three, is assigned to the patient, as periodontal disease staging takes the most severe condition.
- 🔄 **Grading Process**: Similar to staging, grading selects the worst condition, considering factors like bone loss over five years and patient habits.
- 🏥 **AAP Guidelines**: Follow the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) guidelines for staging and grading to standardize the process.
- ⏱️ **Attachment Loss Over Time**: Account for changes in attachment level over a five-year period, which is a key factor in grading.
- 📈 **Worst Case Scenario**: When grading, always assume Grade B unless there's evidence to suggest a shift to Grade A or C, highlighting the worst-case scenario.
- 📋 **Documentation**: Keep a record of all findings, including CAL, probing depth, radiographic bone loss, tooth loss, and patient lifestyle habits for comprehensive patient profiles.
Q & A
What is the purpose of staging and grading in the context of periodontitis?
-Staging and grading are used to assess the severity of periodontitis in a patient. It helps in determining the extent of bone loss and the progression of the disease, which is crucial for planning appropriate treatment strategies.
Which patients are staged and graded for periodontitis?
-Only patients who have been diagnosed with periodontitis and have experienced bone loss are staged and graded.
What does the term 'CAL' stand for in the context of periodontal assessment?
-CAL stands for Clinical Attachment Level, which refers to the level of attachment between the tooth and the surrounding gum tissue. It is measured in millimeters and is an important factor in staging and grading periodontitis.
What is the significance of probing depth in determining the stage of periodontitis?
-Probing depth is a measure of how deep the periodontal pocket is, which indicates the severity of the disease. It helps in identifying the stage of periodontitis, with deeper pockets often correlating with more advanced stages.
How is radiographic bone loss assessed in periodontal disease?
-Radiographic bone loss is assessed by examining dental X-rays or other imaging techniques to determine the extent of bone loss around the teeth. It is categorized based on whether the bone loss extends to the middle or apical third of the root.
What is the role of tooth loss in the grading of periodontitis?
-Tooth loss due to periodontitis is a factor in grading the severity of the disease. The number of teeth lost because of periodontal disease is considered when determining the grade, with more tooth loss indicating a higher grade.
How is smoking related to the grading of periodontitis?
-Smoking is a significant risk factor for periodontitis. Patients who smoke more than 10 cigarettes a day are often graded higher due to the increased risk of disease progression and poorer treatment outcomes.
What is the formula used to calculate the percentage of bone loss over age?
-The percentage of bone loss over age is calculated by dividing the estimated percentage of bone loss by the patient's age. For example, if a 50-year-old patient has lost an estimated 30% of their bone, the calculation would be 30 divided by 50.
Why is it important to consider the worst case scenario when staging and grading periodontitis?
-Considering the worst case scenario ensures that the patient receives appropriate treatment for the most severe aspects of their disease. It helps in planning the most effective course of action to manage and potentially reverse the damage caused by periodontitis.
What does the term 'grade' represent in the context of periodontal disease?
-The grade represents the severity of periodontal disease based on additional factors such as bone loss over a five-year period, smoking habits, and medical conditions like diabetes. It helps in refining the treatment plan and predicting the disease's progression.
How does the number of teeth lost due to periodontitis influence the staging of the disease?
-The number of teeth lost due to periodontitis is a factor in determining the stage of the disease. More teeth loss often indicates a more advanced stage of periodontitis, reflecting the severity of the condition.
Outlines
😀 Periodontitis Staging and Grading Explanation
This paragraph explains the process of staging and grading for periodontitis in clients. It emphasizes that staging and grading are only done for clients with periodontitis and bone loss. The example provided involves a 28-year-old client with an interdental clinical attachment level (CAL) of three to four millimeters. The highest CAL and CAL readings are identified, and the staging is based on the worst reading in the mouth, which is a five millimeter pocket in this case. The grading involves assessing interdental CAL, radiographic bone loss (LBL), tooth loss due to periodontitis, and other local features like smoking habits. The subject is determined to be in stage three due to the severity of the periodontitis and given a grade C because of rapid bone loss and smoking.
😉 Calculating Radiographic Bone Loss Percentage
The second paragraph delves into how to calculate the percentage of bone loss over time in relation to a patient's age. It uses a 50-year-old client as an example, detailing the client's periodontal condition, including a four-millimeter interdental CAL, no tooth loss, and horizontal bone loss of less than two millimeters over the past five years. The client is a non-smoker and non-diabetic. The paragraph explains the process of estimating bone loss percentage and categorizing it according to theAAP guidelines. The client is ultimately classified as stage two, grade B, based on the radiographic bone loss and other factors.
😌 Periodontal Client Assessment and Grading
The third paragraph focuses on assessing a 47-year-old client with periodontal disease. The client has a five-millimeter interdental CAL, has lost four teeth due to periodontitis, and has a probing depth of six millimeters or more. Radiographic bone loss extends to the middle third of the root, and there is evidence of vertical bone loss. The client is not a smoker but is diabetic. The paragraph outlines the process of determining the stage and grade of the client's periodontal condition. The client is placed in stage three due to the severity of the bone loss and other factors, and the grading process is explained, leading to a grade B classification.
😓 Stage Four Periodontitis Diagnosis and Grading
The final paragraph discusses the assessment of a 53-year-old client with advanced periodontitis. The client presents with an interdental CAL of five millimeters or more, loss of more than five teeth due to periodontitis, a probing depth of six millimeters or more, radiographic bone loss extending to the middle third of the root and beyond, and vertical bone loss. The client is not diabetic but smokes half a pack of cigarettes daily. The paragraph details the process of staging, concluding that the client is in stage four due to the extent of the bone loss and other indicators. For grading, it is assumed to be grade B unless evidence suggests otherwise, and after evaluating the client's conditions, the client remains classified as grade B.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Periodontitis
💡Staging and Grading
💡Interdental CAL
💡Probing Depth (PD)
💡Radiographic Bone Loss (LBL)
💡Tooth Loss
💡Smoking
💡Diabetes
💡Horizontal Bone Loss
💡Vertical Bone Loss
💡Attachment Loss
Highlights
The process of staging and grading is specific to clients with periodontitis and bone loss.
Interdental clinical attachment levels (CAL) and probing pocket depths (PPD) are key measurements for staging and grading periodontal disease.
The highest CAL and PPD readings are used to determine the stage of periodontal disease.
Radiographic bone loss assessment is crucial, with the worst bone level indicating the stage of disease.
Tooth loss due to periodontitis, not other causes, is considered in the grading process.
Local factors such as smoking significantly influence the grading of periodontal disease.
The AAP guidelines are followed for staging and grading, with the worst stage and grade being assigned to the client.
A hypothetical example is used to illustrate the process of determining stage and grade, emphasizing the importance of the highest readings.
The percentage of bone loss relative to the client's age is calculated to determine the radiographic bone level.
Smoking status and other systemic conditions are factored into the grade of periodontal disease.
The client's age is a critical factor in the calculation of bone loss percentage.
Differentiating between horizontal and vertical bone loss is important for accurate staging.
Non-smokers and those without diabetes are generally assigned a lower grade, unless evidence suggests otherwise.
The grading system automatically assumes a grade B unless there is evidence to place the client in grade A or C.
Attachment loss over a five-year period is considered in the grading, with more than two millimeters indicating a higher grade.
Conservatism in staging is advised, with the clinician choosing the worst area to determine the stage.
Multiple examples are provided to demonstrate the staging and grading process in various patient scenarios.
Transcripts
Browse More Related Video
The new periodontal classification *MUST WATCH FOR ALL DENTISTS*
Assessing periodontitis: clinical examples & key points - tutorial by Mariano Sanz
AAP Periodontal Disease Classification Animation – Sponsored by J&J
New classification of periodontitis
Periodontics | Diagnosis & Periodontal Exam | INBDE, ADAT
Periodontics | New Classification System | INBDE, ADAT
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)
Thanks for rating: